Rodriguez Daniela C, Neel Abigail H, Mahendradhata Yodi, Deressa Wakgari, Owoaje Eme, Akinyemi Oluwaseun, Sarker Malabika, Mafuta Eric, Gupta Shiv D, Salehi Ahmad Shah, Jain Anika, Alonge Olakunle
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Center for Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Jun 3;36(5):707-719. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab044.
Vertical disease control programmes have enormous potential to benefit or weaken health systems, and it is critical to understand how programmes' design and implementation impact the health systems and communities in which they operate. We use the Develop-Distort Dilemma (DDD) framework to understand how the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) distorted or developed local health systems. We include document review and 176 interviews with respondents at the global level and across seven focus countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia and Nigeria). We use DDD domains, contextual factors and transition planning to analyse interactions between the broader context, local health systems and the GPEI to identify changes. Our analysis confirms earlier research including improved health worker, laboratory and surveillance capacity, monitoring and accountability, and efforts to reach vulnerable populations, whereas distortions include shifting attention from routine health services and distorting local payment and incentives structures. New findings highlight how global-level governance structures evolved and affected national actors; issues of country ownership, including for data systems, where the polio programme is not indigenously financed; how expectations of success have affected implementation at programme and community level; and unresolved tensions around transition planning. The decoupling of polio eradication from routine immunization, in particular, plays an outsize role in these issues as it removed attention from system strengthening. In addition to drawing lessons from the GPEI experience for other efforts, we also reflect on the use of the DDD framework for assessing programmes and their system-level impacts. Future eradication efforts should be approached carefully, and new initiatives of any kind should leverage the existing health system while considering equity, inclusion and transition from the start.
垂直疾病控制项目对于卫生系统的强化或削弱有着巨大潜力,了解项目的设计与实施如何影响其所在的卫生系统及社区至关重要。我们运用“发展-扭曲困境”(DDD)框架来理解全球根除脊髓灰质炎行动(GPEI)如何扭曲或发展当地卫生系统。我们开展了文献回顾,并对全球层面以及七个重点国家(阿富汗、孟加拉国、刚果民主共和国、埃塞俄比亚、印度、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚)的176名受访者进行了访谈。我们运用DDD领域、背景因素和过渡规划来分析更广泛背景、当地卫生系统与GPEI之间的相互作用,以确定变化情况。我们的分析证实了早期研究结果,包括卫生工作者、实验室和监测能力的提升、监测与问责制以及为覆盖弱势群体所做的努力,而扭曲方面则包括将注意力从常规卫生服务上转移以及扭曲当地支付和激励结构。新发现凸显了全球层面治理结构如何演变并影响国家行为体;国家自主权问题,包括数据系统方面,因为脊髓灰质炎项目并非由本国出资;成功预期如何影响项目和社区层面的实施;以及围绕过渡规划未解决的紧张关系。尤其是将根除脊髓灰质炎与常规免疫脱钩,在这些问题中起到了格外突出的作用,因为它使人们不再关注系统强化。除了从GPEI的经验中为其他工作吸取教训外,我们还反思了运用DDD框架评估项目及其系统层面影响的情况。未来的根除工作应谨慎推进,任何新举措都应在从一开始就考虑公平、包容和过渡的同时,利用现有的卫生系统。