Neel Abigail H, Olateju Adetoun, Peters Michael A, Schleiff Meike, Alonge Olakunle
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sparkman Center for Global Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Aug 7;4:1287554. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1287554. eCollection 2024.
There is limited guidance on strategies for delivering complex global health programs. We synthesized available evidence on implementation strategies and outcomes utilized in the global polio eradication initiative (GPEI) across low and middle-income country (LMIC) settings.
We nested our scoping review into a literature review conducted as part of a parent study, STRIPE. This review systematically searched PubMed for articles between 1 January 1988 and 25 April 2018 using polio search terms. Strategies from included studies were organized according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework, specified using Proctor's framework, and linked to various outcomes (implementation, services delivery, impact).
152 unique articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria (from 1,885 articles included in the parent study). Only 43 out of the 152 articles described a suitable quantitative study design for evaluating outcomes. We extracted 66 outcomes from the 43 unique studies. Study publication dates ranged from 1989 to 2018 and represented diverse country settings. The most common implementation strategies were developing mechanisms for feedback, monitoring, and evaluation ( = 69); increasing awareness among the population ( = 58); involving stakeholders, workers, and consumers in the implementation efforts ( = 46); conducting workshops ( = 33); using mass media ( = 31); and building robust record systems to capture outcomes ( = 31). Coverage ( = 13) and morbidity ( = 12) were the most frequently identified outcomes, followed by effectiveness ( = 9) and fidelity ( = 6). Feasibility and sustainability were rarely evaluated.
This review provides a catalogue of implementation strategies and outcomes relevant for advancing global health services delivery in LMICs drawing from the GPEI. Implementation strategies reviewed were poorly described and not adequately linked to outcomes. It calls for additional implementation research to unravel the mechanisms of implementation strategies and their effectiveness, and adaptation of the ERIC framework in LMICs.
关于实施复杂全球卫生项目的策略,指导意见有限。我们综合了在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)环境中全球根除脊髓灰质炎行动(GPEI)所采用的实施策略及成果的现有证据。
我们将范围综述嵌套于作为一项母研究(STRIPE)一部分进行的文献综述中。本综述使用脊髓灰质炎搜索词在PubMed中系统检索了1988年1月1日至2018年4月25日期间的文章。纳入研究的策略根据实施变革专家建议(ERIC)框架进行组织,该框架使用普罗克特框架进行细化,并与各种成果(实施、服务提供、影响)相关联。
152篇独特文章符合我们的纳入标准(来自母研究纳入的1885篇文章)。152篇文章中只有43篇描述了用于评估成果的合适定量研究设计。我们从43项独特研究中提取了66项成果。研究发表日期从1989年到2018年不等,涵盖了不同的国家环境。最常见的实施策略是建立反馈、监测和评估机制(n = 69);提高公众意识(n = 58);让利益相关者、工作人员和消费者参与实施工作(n = 46);举办研讨会(n = 33);使用大众媒体(n = 31);以及建立强大的记录系统以记录成果(n = 31)。覆盖率(n = 13)和发病率(n = 12)是最常确定的成果,其次是有效性(n = 9)和保真度(n = 6)。可行性和可持续性很少被评估。
本综述提供了一份与推进低收入和中等收入国家全球卫生服务提供相关的实施策略和成果目录,借鉴了全球根除脊髓灰质炎行动。所综述的实施策略描述不佳,与成果的关联也不充分。这需要更多的实施研究来揭示实施策略的机制及其有效性,并在低收入和中等收入国家对ERIC框架进行调整。