Suppr超能文献

颌面锥形束 CT 中的散射与原发比:视野和射线能量的影响。

Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.

机构信息

Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Dec 1;50(8):20200597. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200597. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of field of view (FOV) and beam energy on the scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) in dental cone-beam CT (CBCT).

METHODS

An anthropomorphic phantom representing an adult male (ATOM Max 711-HN, Norfolk, VA, USA) was scanned using the 3D Accuitomo 170 CBCT (J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) using 11 FOVs. During each scan, half of the X-ray beam was blocked. Each scan was performed at three exposure settings with varying beam energy and equal radiation dose: 90 kV 5 mA, 77 kV 7.5 mA and 69 kV 10 mA. The SPR was estimated by measuring the grey values in the blocked and non-blocked regions of the RAW data. The effect of FOV on SPR was evaluated using Dunn's multiple comparison test, and the effect of the exposure settings was compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Larger FOVs showed increased scatter. FOVs with a shorter isocenter-detector distance showed a particularly high SPR. Most intercomparisons between FOVs were statistically significant. The largest difference was found between 17 × 12 cm and 6 × 6 cm (lower jaw), with the former showing a 4.9-fold higher SPR. The effect of beam energy was relatively small and varied between FOV sizes and positions.

CONCLUSION

While the choice of FOV size and position is determined by the diagnostic region of interest, the image quality deterioration for large FOVs due to scatter provides another incentive to limit the FOV size as much as possible.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估视野(FOV)和射线能量对口腔锥形束 CT(CBCT)中散射与原射线比(SPR)的影响。

方法

使用 3D Accuitomo 170 CBCT(日本京都 J.Morita)对代表成年男性的人体模型(ATOM Max 711-HN,美国弗吉尼亚州诺福克)进行扫描,共使用 11 个 FOV。每次扫描时,将一半的 X 射线束阻挡。在三个不同的射线能量和相等辐射剂量的曝光设置下进行每次扫描:90 kV 5 mA、77 kV 7.5 mA 和 69 kV 10 mA。通过测量 RAW 数据中阻挡和非阻挡区域的灰度值来估算 SPR。使用 Dunn 多重比较检验评估 FOV 对 SPR 的影响,使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较曝光设置的影响。

结果

较大的 FOV 显示出更高的散射。具有较短等中心-探测器距离的 FOV 表现出特别高的 SPR。大多数 FOV 之间的比较具有统计学意义。最大的差异出现在 17×12 cm 和 6×6 cm(下颌)之间,前者的 SPR 高 4.9 倍。射线能量的影响相对较小,且因 FOV 大小和位置而异。

结论

虽然 FOV 大小和位置的选择取决于诊断感兴趣区域,但大 FOV 由于散射导致的图像质量恶化为尽可能限制 FOV 大小提供了另一个激励因素。

相似文献

1
Scatter-to-primary ratio in dentomaxillofacial cone-beam CT: effect of field of view and beam energy.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Dec 1;50(8):20200597. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200597. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Feb;121(2):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose?
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7881-7888. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05380-w. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Characterization of Scattered X-Ray Photons in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):e0149904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149904. eCollection 2016.
10
Image quality optimization of narrow detector dental computed tomography for paediatric patients.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Jul;48(5):20190032. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190032. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

4
The influence of the field of view and voxel size on the contrast-to-noise ratio in cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Dec;54(4):362-369. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240096. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
5
Gray values and noise behavior of cone-beam computed tomography machines-an in vitro study.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2025 Feb 1;54(2):140-148. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae053.
6
Deep learning architecture for scatter estimation in cone-beam computed tomography head imaging with varying field-of-measurement settings.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Sep;11(5):053501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.5.053501. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Patients' attitudes toward artificial intelligence in dentistry and their trust in dentists.
Oral Radiol. 2025 Jan;41(1):52-59. doi: 10.1007/s11282-024-00775-1. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
10
Evaluation of the feasibility of a multisource CBCT for maxillofacial imaging.
Phys Med Biol. 2023 Aug 14;68(17). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acea17.

本文引用的文献

4
Incidental findings on cone-beam computed tomographic images: paranasal sinus findings and nasal septum variations.
Oral Radiol. 2018 Jan;34(1):40-48. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0283-y. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
Optimization of exposure parameters in dental cone beam computed tomography using a 3-step approach.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Dec;126(6):545-552. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Optimal combination of anti-scatter grids and software correction for CBCT imaging.
Med Phys. 2017 Sep;44(9):4437-4451. doi: 10.1002/mp.12385. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
Impact of cone-beam computed tomography scan mode on the diagnostic yield of chemically simulated external root resorption.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1073-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.041.
10
Incidental Findings in Small Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography Scans.
J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):901-904. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验