Suppr超能文献

保留生育功能的卵巢交界性肿瘤患者行保留输卵管-卵巢切除术与单纯肿瘤剔除术的疗效比较:一项基于术后复发和生育结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a systemic review and meta-analysis on postoperative recurrence and fertility.

机构信息

Beijing Obstertrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 251 Yao Jiayuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 21;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02241-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the postoperative recurrence and fertility in patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) who underwent different surgical procedures: salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy.

METHODS

Potentially relevant literature from inception to Nov. 06, 2020, were retrieved in databases including Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Ovid), and MEDLINE (Pubmed). We applied the keywords "fertility-sparing surgery," or "conservative surgery," or "cystectomy," or "salpingo-oophorectomy," or "oophorectomy," or "adnexectomy," or "borderline ovarian tumor" for literate searching. Systemic reviews and meta-analyses were performed on the postoperative recurrence rates and pregnancy rates between patients receiving the two different surgical methods. Begger's methods, Egger's methods, and funnel plot were used to evaluate the publication bias.

RESULT

Among the sixteen eligible studies, the risk of recurrence was evaluated in all studies, and eight studies assessed the postoperative pregnancy rates in the BOT patients. A total of 1839 cases with borderline ovarian tumors were included, in which 697 patients (37.9%) received unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 1142 patients (62.1%) underwent unilateral/bilateral cystectomy. Meta-analyses showed that BOT patients with unilateral/bilateral cystectomy had significantly higher recurrence risk (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 1.59-2.57) compared with those receiving unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pooled analysis of four studies further confirmed the higher risk of recurrence in patients with cystectomy (HR=2.00, 95% CI: 1.11-3.58). In addition, no significant difference in postoperative pregnancy rate was found between patients with the two different surgical procedures (OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.60-1.42).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the unilateral/bilateral cystectomy, the unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with BOT, and it does not reduce the pregnancy of patients after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021238177.

摘要

背景

比较行不同手术的交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOT)患者的术后复发和生育能力:输卵管卵巢切除术与囊肿切除术。

方法

从建库至 2020 年 11 月 6 日,在 Cochrane Library、EMBASE(Ovid)和 MEDLINE(Pubmed)等数据库中检索潜在相关文献。我们应用关键词“保留生育力手术”或“保守手术”或“囊肿切除术”或“输卵管卵巢切除术”或“卵巢切除术”或“附件切除术”或“交界性卵巢肿瘤”进行文献检索。对接受两种不同手术方法的患者的术后复发率和妊娠率进行系统评价和荟萃分析。贝格方法、埃格方法和漏斗图用于评估发表偏倚。

结果

在 16 项合格研究中,所有研究均评估了复发风险,8 项研究评估了 BOT 患者的术后妊娠率。共纳入 1839 例交界性卵巢肿瘤患者,其中 697 例(37.9%)患者行单侧输卵管卵巢切除术,1142 例(62.1%)患者行单侧/双侧囊肿切除术。荟萃分析显示,与单侧输卵管卵巢切除术相比,行单侧/双侧囊肿切除术的 BOT 患者复发风险显著增加(OR=2.02,95%CI:1.59-2.57)。四项研究的合并分析进一步证实了囊肿切除术患者复发风险较高(HR=2.00,95%CI:1.11-3.58)。此外,两种不同手术方式的患者术后妊娠率无显著差异(OR=0.92,95%CI:0.60-1.42)。

结论

与单侧/双侧囊肿切除术相比,单侧输卵管卵巢切除术可显著降低 BOT 患者术后复发风险,且不会降低患者术后妊娠率。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42021238177。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508f/8061226/50d1e54a50a3/12957_2021_2241_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验