• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉手术中的出血风险分层:不应出血评分

Bleeding risk stratification in coronary artery surgery: the should-not-bleed score.

作者信息

Petricevic Mirna, Petricevic Mate, Pasalic Marijan, Golubic Cepulic Branka, Raos Mirela, Vasicek Vesna, Goerlinger Klaus, Rotim Kresimir, Gasparovic Hrvoje, Biocina Bojan

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

University Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01473-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-021-01473-3
PMID:33882969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8059187/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An estimated 20% of allogeneic blood transfusions in the United States are associated with cardiac surgery. It is estimated that 11% of red cell resources were used for transfusion support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a documented wide variability in transfusion rate (7.8 to 92.8%). To address the issue of unnecessary transfusions within the CABG population, we developed a model to predict which patients are at low risk of bleeding for whom transfusion treatment might be considered unnecessary. Herein we present our "SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE" application developed for the Windows® software platform which is based on our previous research.

METHODS

This study is aimed to develop a user-friendly application that stratifies patients with respect to bleeding risk. The statistical model we used in our previous research was focused on detection of CABG patients at low risk of bleeding. The rationale behind such an approach was to identify a CABG patient subgroup at low risk of bleeding. By identifying patients at low risk of bleeding we can define a subgroup of patients for whom transfusion treatment might be considered unnecessary. We developed a Windows platform application based on risk modelling which we previously calculated for 1426 patients undergoing elective CABG from January 2010 to January 2018.

RESULTS

The SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE risk score is developed for the Windows software platform. A mathematical model that is based on multivariate analysis was used for app development. The variables that entered the scoring system were: Age; Body Mass Index; Chronic Renal Failure; Preoperative Clopidogrel Exposure; Preoperative Red Blood Cells Count; Preoperative Fibrinogen Level; Preoperative Multiplate ASPI test area under the curve (AUC) units. The SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE identifies/predicts patients without a risk for excessive bleeding with strong discriminatory performance (Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis AUC 72.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SHOULD-NOT-BLEED risk scoring application may be useful in the preoperative risk screening process. The clinical and economic burden associated with unnecessary transfusions may be adequately addressed by a preoperative scoring system detecting patients at low risk of bleeding for whom transfusion treatment might be considered unnecessary.

摘要

背景

在美国,估计所有异体输血中有20%与心脏手术相关。据估计,11%的红细胞资源用于为接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者提供输血支持,输血率存在明显差异(7.8%至92.8%)。为解决CABG人群中不必要输血的问题,我们开发了一个模型,以预测哪些患者出血风险较低,可能无需进行输血治疗。在此,我们展示我们基于先前研究为Windows®软件平台开发的“SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE”应用程序。

方法

本研究旨在开发一个用户友好的应用程序,对患者的出血风险进行分层。我们在先前研究中使用的统计模型侧重于检测出血风险较低的CABG患者。这种方法背后的基本原理是识别出出血风险较低的CABG患者亚组。通过识别出血风险较低的患者,我们可以定义一个可能无需进行输血治疗的患者亚组。我们基于风险建模开发了一个Windows平台应用程序,该模型是我们先前对2010年1月至2018年1月期间接受择期CABG的1426例患者计算得出的。

结果

SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE风险评分是为Windows软件平台开发的。应用程序开发使用了基于多变量分析的数学模型。进入评分系统的变量包括:年龄;体重指数;慢性肾功能衰竭;术前氯吡格雷暴露情况;术前红细胞计数;术前纤维蛋白原水平;术前Multiplate ASPI检测曲线下面积(AUC)单位。SHOULD-NOT-BLEED-SCORE能够识别/预测无过度出血风险的患者,具有很强的鉴别性能(受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析AUC为72.3%,p < 0.001)。

结论

SHOULD-NOT-BLEED风险评分应用程序可能有助于术前风险筛查过程。术前评分系统可以充分解决与不必要输血相关的临床和经济负担,该系统可检测出出血风险较低、可能无需进行输血治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Bleeding risk stratification in coronary artery surgery: the should-not-bleed score.冠状动脉手术中的出血风险分层:不应出血评分
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01473-3.
2
Prediction of severe bleeding after coronary surgery: the WILL-BLEED Risk Score.冠状动脉手术后严重出血的预测:WILL-BLEED风险评分
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Feb 28;117(3):445-456. doi: 10.1160/TH16-09-0721. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Predictiveness of different preoperative risk assessments for postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术后不同术前风险评估对术后出血的预测性。
Perfusion. 2021 Apr;36(3):277-284. doi: 10.1177/0267659120941327. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Cost Analysis of Transfusion Therapy in Coronary Artery Surgery.冠状动脉手术中输血治疗的成本分析。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):621-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697600. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Platelet activity measured by a rapid turnaround assay identifies coronary artery bypass grafting patients at increased risk for bleeding and transfusion complications after clopidogrel administration.通过快速周转检测测量的血小板活性可识别出接受氯吡格雷治疗后出血和输血并发症风险增加的冠状动脉旁路移植术患者。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1259-1266, 1266.e1; discussion 1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
6
Drug, devices, technologies, and techniques for blood management in minimally invasive and conventional cardiothoracic surgery: a consensus statement from the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011.微创和传统心胸外科手术中血液管理的药物、器械、技术与方法:国际微创心胸外科协会(ISMICS)2011年共识声明
Innovations (Phila). 2012 Jul-Aug;7(4):229-41. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182747699.
7
Association among Clopidogrel Cessation, Platelet Function, and Bleeding in Coronary Bypass Surgery: An Observational Trial.氯吡格雷停药、血小板功能与冠状动脉旁路移植术出血的相关性:一项观察性试验。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):630-638. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693122. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Predictive scores for major bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery in low operative risk patients.低手术风险患者冠状动脉搭桥术后大出血的预测评分
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Apr;61(2):234-242. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11048-6. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Is Preoperative Clopidogrel Resistance a Predictor of Bleeding and Risks in Patients Undergoing Emergency CABG Surgery?术前氯吡格雷抵抗是否是急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术患者出血及风险的预测指标?
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;33(4):330-338. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0005.
10
Predicting Bleeding Risk by Platelet Function Testing in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery.通过血小板功能检测预测心脏手术患者的出血风险
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Nov;38(11):679-83. doi: 10.1002/clc.22472. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative Changes in Hemostatic Properties as Assessed by Multiplate, Siemens PFA-200, and ROTEM-A Comparative Study.通过Multiplate、西门子PFA-200和ROTEM评估围手术期止血特性的变化:一项比较研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1640. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051640.
2
2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.2024年欧洲心胸外科学会/欧洲心胸麻醉学会与欧洲血液管理协作组关于成人心脏手术患者血液管理的指南
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 May 6;40(5). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae170.
3
2024 EACTS/EACTAIC Guidelines on patient blood management in adult cardiac surgery in collaboration with EBCP.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive scores for major bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery in low operative risk patients.低手术风险患者冠状动脉搭桥术后大出血的预测评分
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Apr;61(2):234-242. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11048-6. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
Cost Analysis of Transfusion Therapy in Coronary Artery Surgery.冠状动脉手术中输血治疗的成本分析。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):621-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697600. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
3
Aspirin Resistance Significantly Influences Clinical and Economic Burden in Cardiac Surgery Patients.
2024年欧洲心胸外科学会/欧洲心胸麻醉学会与欧洲输血协作项目合作制定的成人心脏手术患者血液管理指南。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 6;67(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae352.
4
Evaluation of the Factors Influencing Blood Transfusion during Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术中影响输血因素的评估
Cardiology. 2025;150(1):98-110. doi: 10.1159/000540349. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1627. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.08.084. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Association among Clopidogrel Cessation, Platelet Function, and Bleeding in Coronary Bypass Surgery: An Observational Trial.氯吡格雷停药、血小板功能与冠状动脉旁路移植术出血的相关性:一项观察性试验。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;69(7):630-638. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693122. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Adverse Outcomes of Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.马来西亚理科大学医院冠状动脉搭桥手术围手术期红细胞输血的不良后果
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 May;26(3):49-63. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.3.4. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Intra-operative red blood cell transfusion and mortality after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后术中输红细胞与死亡率。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 May 4;19(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0738-2.
7
Evaluation of risk scores in predicting perioperative blood transfusions in adult cardiac surgery.评估风险评分在预测成人心脏手术围手术期输血中的作用。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):73-78. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_18_18.
8
Current Practice of State-of-the-Art Surgical Coronary Revascularization.当前最先进的冠状动脉血运重建术的实践。
Circulation. 2017 Oct 3;136(14):1331-1345. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022572.
9
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
10
Prediction of severe bleeding after coronary surgery: the WILL-BLEED Risk Score.冠状动脉手术后严重出血的预测:WILL-BLEED风险评分
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Feb 28;117(3):445-456. doi: 10.1160/TH16-09-0721. Epub 2016 Dec 1.