Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Neurosci. 2021 May 19;41(20):4439-4447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3238-20.2021. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Animal studies suggest that cochlear nerve degeneration precedes sensory cell degeneration in both noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and age-related hearing loss (ARHL), producing a hearing impairment that is not reflected in audiometric thresholds. Here, we investigated the histopathology of human ARHL and NIHL by comparing loss of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), cochlear hair cells and the stria vascularis in a group of 52 cases with noise-exposure history against an age-matched control group. Although strial atrophy increased with age, there was no effect of noise history. Outer hair cell (OHC) loss also increased with age throughout the cochlea but was unaffected by noise history in the low-frequency region (<2 kHz), while greatly exacerbated at high frequencies (≥2 kHz). Inner hair cell (IHC) loss was primarily seen at high frequencies but was unaffected by noise at either low or high frequencies. ANF loss was substantial at all cochlear frequencies and was exacerbated by noise throughout. According to a multivariable regression model, this loss of neural channels contributes to poor word discrimination among those with similar audiometric threshold losses. The histopathological patterns observed also suggest that, whereas the low-frequency OHC loss may be an unavoidable consequence of aging, the high-frequency loss, which produces the classic down-sloping audiogram of ARHL, may be partially because of avoidable ear abuse, even among those without a documented history of acoustic overexposure. As regenerative therapeutics in sensorineural hearing loss enter clinical trials, it becomes critical to infer which cochlear pathologies are present in addition to hair cell loss. Here, by analyzing human autopsy material, we show that acoustic injury accelerates age-related primary neural degeneration, but not strial degeneration, neither of which can be inferred from audiometric thresholds. It exacerbates outer hair cell (OHC) loss only in the high-frequency half of the cochlea, suggesting that the apical loss is age-related, whereas the basal loss is partially noise induced, and therefore avoidable. Statistical analysis suggests that neural loss helps explain differences in word-recognition ability among individuals with similar audiometric thresholds. The surprising correlation between neural loss and OHC loss in the cochlea's speech region also implicates neural loss in the well-known decline in word scores as thresholds deteriorate with age.
动物研究表明,在噪声性听力损失(NIHL)和年龄相关性听力损失(ARHL)中,耳蜗神经退化先于感觉细胞退化,导致听力损失在听阈测试中无法反映。在这里,我们通过比较一组有噪声暴露史的 52 例病例与年龄匹配的对照组的听神经纤维(ANF)、耳蜗毛细胞和血管纹的损失,研究了人类 ARHL 和 NIHL 的组织病理学。尽管血管纹萎缩随年龄增长而增加,但噪声史无影响。在外毛细胞(OHC)损失也随年龄增长而增加,但在低频区(<2 kHz)不受噪声史影响,而在高频区(≥2 kHz)则大大加剧。内毛细胞(IHC)损失主要发生在高频区,但在低频或高频区均不受噪声影响。ANF 损失在所有耳蜗频率都很大,并因噪声而加剧。根据多变量回归模型,这种神经通道的损失导致那些具有相似听阈损失的人在单词识别方面较差。观察到的组织病理学模式还表明,虽然低频 OHC 损失可能是衰老的不可避免的结果,但高频损失,即 ARHL 的经典下倾听力图,可能部分是由于可避免的耳部滥用,即使在没有记录的听力过度暴露史的人群中也是如此。随着感觉神经性听力损失的再生治疗进入临床试验,推断除毛细胞损失外还存在哪些耳蜗病变变得至关重要。在这里,通过分析人体解剖材料,我们表明,声损伤加速了与年龄相关的原发性神经退化,但不加速血管纹退化,这两者都不能从听力阈值推断出来。它仅在耳蜗的高频半部分加剧外毛细胞(OHC)损失,这表明顶端损失是与年龄相关的,而基底损失部分是噪声诱导的,因此是可以避免的。统计分析表明,神经损失有助于解释具有相似听阈的个体在单词识别能力上的差异。神经损失与耳蜗言语区 OHC 损失之间的惊人相关性也表明,随着年龄的增长,听力阈值恶化,神经损失与众所周知的单词分数下降有关。