Köhler Tobias, Feoktystov Artem, Petracic Oleg, Kentzinger Emmanuel, Bhatnagar-Schöffmann Tanvi, Feygenson Mikhail, Nandakumaran Nileena, Landers Joachim, Wende Heiko, Cervellino Antonio, Rücker Ulrich, Kovács András, Dunin-Borkowski Rafal E, Brückel Thomas
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science JCNS at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum MLZ, 85748 Garching, Germany.
Nanoscale. 2021 Apr 14;13(14):6965-6976. doi: 10.1039/d0nr08615k. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Iron oxide nanoparticles are presently considered as main work horses for various applications including targeted drug delivery and magnetic hyperthermia. Several questions remain unsolved regarding the effect of size onto their overall magnetic behavior. One aspect is the reduction of magnetization compared to bulk samples. A detailed understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this reduction could improve the particle performance in applications. Here we use a number of complementary experimental techniques including neutron scattering and synchrotron X-ray diffraction to arrive at a consistent conclusion. We confirm the observation from previous studies of a reduced saturation magnetization and argue that this reduction is mainly associated with the presence of antiphase boundaries, which are observed directly using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and indirectly via an anisotropic peak broadening in X-ray diffraction patterns. Additionally small-angle neutron scattering with polarized neutrons revealed a small non-magnetic surface layer, that is, however, not sufficient to explain the observed loss in magnetization alone.
Nanoscale. 2021-4-14
J Appl Crystallogr. 2021-11-16
Nanotechnology. 2012-1-11
J Appl Crystallogr. 2022-11-4
Nanoscale Adv. 2022-1-17
Polymers (Basel). 2022-2-15
J Appl Crystallogr. 2021-11-16
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021-9-8