Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Endocrine Research Unit, 5-194 Joseph, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Diabetologia. 2021 Aug;64(8):1766-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05455-x. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Early famine exposure has been related to the development of type 2 diabetes; however, little is known about whether the genetic background modifies this association. We aimed to investigate the joint effects of famine exposure at different stages of early life and genetic susceptibility on diabetes risk in adulthood.
The study included 8350 participants from the Survey on Prevalence in East China for Metabolic Diseases and Risk Factors (SPECT-China) who were born around the time of the Chinese Great Famine. We determined famine exposure subgroups according to the birth year as nonexposed (1963-1974), fetal-exposed (1959-1962), childhood-exposed (1949-1958), and adolescence-exposed (1941-1948). We developed a genetic risk score of 21 variants previously associated with type 2 diabetes in East Asians. Hierarchical logistic models were used to examine the association of famine exposure and genetic risk with diabetes.
The age-standardised prevalence of diabetes in nonexposed, fetal-exposed, childhood-exposed and adolescence-exposed subgroups was 13.0%, 18.2%, 15.1% and 13.2%, respectively. Compared with nonexposed participants, fetal-exposed participants showed an increased risk of diabetes in adulthood (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.13, 1.93). A higher genetic risk score was associated with an increased risk of diabetes (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.15, 1.31 per SD increment). The association between famine exposure and diabetes was consistent across genetic risk strata (all p for interaction >0.05). When considered jointly, fetal- or childhood-exposed participants at high genetic risk (highest tertile of genetic risk score) had 2.60-fold (95% CI 1.71, 3.93) and 1.95-fold (95% CI 1.24, 3.05) higher risks of diabetes, respectively, compared with nonexposed participants at low genetic risk (lowest tertile).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Prenatal exposure to famine was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults independent of genetic risk score using 21 variants common in the East Asian population. Famine exposure and genetic susceptibility may exhibit an additive effect on diabetes development.
目的/假设:早期饥荒暴露与 2 型糖尿病的发展有关;然而,对于遗传背景是否会改变这种关联知之甚少。我们旨在研究不同生命早期阶段的饥荒暴露和遗传易感性对成年期糖尿病风险的联合影响。
本研究纳入了来自中国代谢性疾病和危险因素调查(SPECT-China)的 8350 名参与者,他们出生于中国大饥荒时期。我们根据出生年份确定了无暴露(1963-1974 年)、胎儿暴露(1959-1962 年)、儿童暴露(1949-1958 年)和青少年暴露(1941-1948 年)的暴露亚组。我们制定了一个东亚人群中与 2 型糖尿病相关的 21 个变异体的遗传风险评分。使用分层逻辑回归模型来检验饥荒暴露和遗传风险与糖尿病的关系。
无暴露、胎儿暴露、儿童暴露和青少年暴露亚组的年龄标准化糖尿病患病率分别为 13.0%、18.2%、15.1%和 13.2%。与无暴露参与者相比,胎儿暴露参与者在成年期患糖尿病的风险增加(OR 1.47;95%CI 1.13,1.93)。较高的遗传风险评分与糖尿病风险增加相关(OR 每增加 1 个标准差为 1.23;95%CI 1.15,1.31)。在遗传风险分层中,饥荒暴露与糖尿病的关联是一致的(所有交互作用 p 值均>0.05)。当同时考虑时,高遗传风险(遗传风险评分最高三分位)的胎儿或儿童暴露者患糖尿病的风险分别比低遗传风险(遗传风险评分最低三分位)的无暴露者高 2.60 倍(95%CI 1.71,3.93)和 1.95 倍(95%CI 1.24,3.05)。
结论/解释:在中国成年人中,与使用东亚人群中常见的 21 个变异体的遗传风险评分相比,胎儿期暴露于饥荒与 2 型糖尿病的风险增加有关。饥荒暴露和遗传易感性可能对糖尿病的发展具有相加效应。