Rehabilitation Sciences Post Graduation Program, Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Health Science Department, Universidade Federal De Santa Catarina, Mato Alto, Araranguá - SC, Brazil.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Dec;38(12):1969-1977. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1917024. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
To evaluate the acute effects of expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) on exercise tolerance, dyspnea, leg discomfort, and breathing pattern in patients with COPD.
Fifteen patients with COPD were assessed with the following three different protocols: EPAP of 7.5 cmHO used during a constant cycle ergometer exercise test (Protocol-1); EPAP of 7.5 cmHO used for 15 minutes before the test (Protocol-2); and a sham system without pressure used for 15 minutes before the test (Protocol-3). Dyspnea and leg discomfort were assessed using Borg scale, whereas breathing pattern by optoelectronic plethysmography. Statistical analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations and Bonferroni tests (α = 5%), considering the protocols (1, 2, and 3) and moment (resting and the end of exercise).
Exercise tolerance was lower in protocol 1: 108 ± 45 seconds compared to protocols 2: 187 ± 99 seconds (.011) and 3: 183 ± 101 seconds (= .021). No difference was observed between protocols 2 and 3 (> .999). Dyspnea in protocol 1: 7.0 ± 2.08 was higher than protocols 2: 4.10 ± 2.45 (= .001) and 3: 3.90 ± 2.21 (< .001), but no differences were observed between protocols 2 and 3 (> .999). No significant difference was observed for leg discomfort among the protocols (= .137). There were no statistically significant differences for most variables of breathing pattern among the protocols.
A reduction on exercise tolerance and an increase in dyspnea were found with EPAP of 7.5 cm HO during a constant cycle ergometer exercise test in patients with COPD.
评估呼气正压通气(EPAP)对 COPD 患者运动耐量、呼吸困难、腿部不适和呼吸模式的急性影响。
15 例 COPD 患者分别进行以下三种不同方案的评估:在恒速功率车运动试验中使用 7.5cmH2O 的 EPAP(方案 1);在试验前使用 7.5cmH2O 的 EPAP 治疗 15 分钟(方案 2);和在试验前使用无压力的假系统治疗 15 分钟(方案 3)。呼吸困难和腿部不适采用 Borg 量表评估,呼吸模式采用光体积描记法。采用广义估计方程和 Bonferroni 检验(α=5%)进行统计学分析,考虑方案(1、2 和 3)和时间(休息和运动结束时)。
方案 1 的运动耐量较低:108±45 秒,与方案 2(187±99 秒)(P=0.011)和方案 3(183±101 秒)(P=0.021)相比。方案 2 和方案 3 之间无差异(P>0.999)。方案 1 的呼吸困难(7.0±2.08)高于方案 2(4.10±2.45)(P=0.001)和方案 3(3.90±2.21)(P<0.001),但方案 2 和方案 3 之间无差异(P>0.999)。方案之间腿部不适无显著差异(P=0.137)。呼吸模式的大多数变量在方案之间无统计学差异。
在 COPD 患者的恒速功率车运动试验中,使用 7.5cmH2O 的 EPAP 可降低运动耐量并增加呼吸困难。