Lose G, Rosenkilde P, Gammelgaard J, Schroeder T
Department of Surgery D, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Urology. 1988 Jul;32(1):78-80. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90462-1.
The result of the one-hour pad-weighing test proposed by the International Continence Society has been demonstrated to depend on the urine load during the test. To increase reproducibility of the pad-weighing test by minimizing the influence of variation in urine load the test was done with a standardized bladder volume (50% of the cystometric bladder capacity). Twenty-five female patients with stress or mixed incontinence underwent two separate tests. Test-retest results were highly correlated (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). Nonetheless, analysis of test-retest differences revealed a variation up to +/- 24 g between two tests. It is concluded that this setup (i.e., standardized bladder volume) of the one-hour pad-weighing test allows for a more reliable assessment of urinary incontinence for quantitative purposes.
国际尿失禁学会提出的一小时尿垫称重试验结果已被证明取决于测试期间的尿量。为了通过最小化尿量变化的影响来提高尿垫称重试验的可重复性，该试验在标准化膀胱容量（膀胱测压膀胱容量的50%）下进行。25名患有压力性或混合性尿失禁的女性患者接受了两次单独测试。重测结果高度相关（r = 0.97，p < 0.001）。尽管如此，重测差异分析显示两次测试之间的变化高达±24 g。得出的结论是，这种一小时尿垫称重试验的设置（即标准化膀胱容量）允许对尿失禁进行更可靠的定量评估。
