Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Core Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jun;232(6):935-945.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Surgically assessed pancreatic texture has been identified as the strongest predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, texture is a subjective parameter with no proven reliability or validity. Therefore, a more objective parameter is needed. In this study, we evaluated the fibrosis level at the pancreatic neck resection margin and correlated fibrosis and all clinico-pathologic parameters collected over the course of the Pancreatogastrostomy vs Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction (RECOPANC) study.
The RECOPANC trial was a multicenter randomized prospective trial of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. There were 261 hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides allocated for histopathologic analyses. Pancreatic fibrosis was scored from 0 to III (no fibrosis up to severe fibrosis) by 2 blinded independent pathologists. All variables possibly associated with POPF were entered into a generalized linear model for multivariable analysis.
The fibrosis grade and pancreatic texture were scored in all 261 patients. In POPF B/C (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C) patients, 71% had a soft pancreas, and fibrosis grades were distributed as follows: 48% with score 0, 28% with score I, 20% with score II, and 7% with score III, respectively. Fibrosis grading showed substantial inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.74) and correlated positively with hard pancreatic texture (p < 0.05). In univariable analysis, area under the curve (AUC) for POPF B/C prediction was higher for fibrosis grade than for pancreatic texture (0.71 vs 0.59). In multivariate analysis, the following predictors were selected: sex, surgeon volume, pancreatic texture, and fibrosis grade. However, the addition of pancreatic texture only led to an incremental improvement (AUC 0.794 vs 0.819).
Histologically evaluated pancreatic fibrosis is an easily applicable and highly reproducible POPF predictor and superior to surgically evaluated pancreatic texture. Future studies might use fibrosis grade for risk stratification in pancreatoduodenectomy.
手术评估的胰腺质地已被确定为预测术后胰瘘的最强指标。然而,质地是一个主观参数,没有经过验证的可靠性或有效性。因此,需要一个更客观的参数。在这项研究中,我们评估了胰腺颈部切除边缘的纤维化程度,并将纤维化程度与在 Pancreatogastrostomy vs Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction(RECOPANC)研究过程中收集的所有临床病理参数相关联。
RECOPANC 试验是一项多中心随机前瞻性胰十二指肠切除术患者试验。共有 261 张苏木精和伊红染色切片分配用于组织病理学分析。两名独立的盲法病理学家将胰腺纤维化程度评分从 0 级到 3 级(无纤维化至严重纤维化)。将所有可能与 POPF 相关的变量纳入广义线性模型进行多变量分析。
在所有 261 名患者中均对纤维化程度和胰腺质地进行了评分。在 POPF B/C(术后胰瘘 B 或 C 级)患者中,71%的患者胰腺质地较软,纤维化程度分布如下:48%为 0 级,28%为 1 级,20%为 2 级,7%为 3 级。纤维化分级显示出相当大的观察者间可靠性(kappa=0.74),并且与硬胰腺质地呈正相关(p<0.05)。在单变量分析中,纤维化分级预测 POPF B/C 的曲线下面积(AUC)高于胰腺质地(0.71 对 0.59)。在多变量分析中,选择了以下预测因子:性别、外科医生手术量、胰腺质地和纤维化分级。然而,仅添加胰腺质地仅导致增量改善(AUC 0.794 对 0.819)。
组织学评估的胰腺纤维化是一种易于应用且高度可重复的 POPF 预测指标,优于手术评估的胰腺质地。未来的研究可能会使用纤维化分级对胰十二指肠切除术进行风险分层。