Chen Shixue, Li Ruixin, Zhang Zhibo, Huang Ziwei, Cui Pengfei, Jia Wangping, Zhang Sujie, Tao Haitao, Wang Lijie, Li Xiaoyan, Wang Jinliang, Ma Junxun, Liu Zhefeng, Huang Di, Zheng Xuan, Saito Yuichi, Ichiki Yoshinobu, Hu Yi
Department of Graduate Administration, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Mar;10(3):1397-1407. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-43.
Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) are likely to receive programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, despite limited evidence. The aim of the present study was to report the clinical outcomes and potential prognostic biomarkers in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors.
We conducted a retrospective study enrolling 101 advanced NSCLC patients from our hospital. Data of patients with poor PS 2-4 receiving PD-1 inhibitors were retrieved from medical records. Patients were stratified based on dichotomized baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), change in NLR (ΔNLR; 6 weeks post-treatment NLR minus baseline NLR), and their combination. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to assess the best cutoff for NLR. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR and ΔNLR for patients' survival.
The optimal cutoff for NLR was 4.5. The median follow-up was 25.7 months, baseline NLR ≥4.5, and ΔNLR ≥0, which were independently and significantly associated with shorter overall survival (both P=0.002) and progression-free survival (P=0.004 for NLR and P<0.001 for ΔNLR). Furthermore, simultaneous elevation of the 2 factors was associated with worsened prognosis; patients with both NLR ≥4.5 and ΔNLR ≥0 had significantly increased risk of death [hazards ratio (HR): 10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.30-27.10] and disease progression (HR: 10.49, 95% CI: 4.39-25.09), compared with both low NLR and ΔNLR patients. Patients with either NLR ≥4.5 or ΔNLR ≥0 showed an intermediate risk for death (HR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.35-7.21) and progression (HR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.62-7.36).
High baseline NLR and increased post-treatment NLR might aid in the stratification of high progression and death risk groups in advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS receiving PD-1 inhibitors.
尽管证据有限,但体能状态(PS)较差的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者仍有可能接受程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抑制剂治疗。本研究的目的是报告接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的PS较差的晚期NSCLC患者的临床结局和潜在的预后生物标志物。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了我院101例晚期NSCLC患者。从病历中检索接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的PS为2-4级的患者数据。根据二分法的基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、NLR的变化(ΔNLR;治疗后6周的NLR减去基线NLR)及其组合对患者进行分层。采用受试者工作特征曲线评估NLR的最佳临界值。多因素Cox分析用于评估NLR和ΔNLR对患者生存的预后价值。
NLR的最佳临界值为4.5。中位随访时间为25.7个月,基线NLR≥4.5和ΔNLR≥0与较短的总生存期(P均=0.002)和无进展生存期(NLR为P=0.004,ΔNLR为P<0.001)独立且显著相关。此外,这两个因素同时升高与预后恶化相关;与NLR和ΔNLR均较低的患者相比,NLR≥4.5且ΔNLR≥0的患者死亡风险[风险比(HR):10.79,95%置信区间(CI):4.30-27.10]和疾病进展风险(HR:10.49,95%CI:4.39-25.09)显著增加。NLR≥4.5或ΔNLR≥0的患者显示出中等的死亡风险(HR:3.12,95%CI:1.35-7.21)和进展风险(HR:3.45,95%CI:1.62-7.36)。
高基线NLR和治疗后NLR升高可能有助于对接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的PS较差的晚期NSCLC患者进行高进展和死亡风险分层。