Han Zhaoqing, Liu Wei, Wang Feng
Department of Respiratory, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200011, China.
General Medicine Department, Zhoujiadu Community Health Service Center Shanghai 200126, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jan 15;17(1):674-684. doi: 10.62347/WKFJ4968. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the clinical effectiveness of combining Anlotinib (ANB) and programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) inhibitors in treating advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (aNSCLC) patients.
The study included 400 aNSCLC patients treated at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between January 2021 and June 2024. The control group (192 cases) received PD-1 inhibitor therapy, while the observation group (208 cases) received ANB + PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Comparative analyses were conducted between the two groups regarding clinical effectiveness, safety (nausea and vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, decreased appetite, and anemia), coagulation function (thrombin time [TT], activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], and fibrinogen [FIB]), serum biochemical indices (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] and matrix metalloproteinase-2 [MMP-2]); immune function (immunoglobulin G/A/M (IgG/IgA/IgM)), serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbohydrate antigen 125 [CA125], and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen [CYFRA21-1]), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), and short-term prognosis (Karnofsky Performance Status Scale [KPS]). Binary logistic regression was used to identify risk factors affecting clinical effectiveness and short-term prognosis.
The observation group showed significantly higher objective response and disease control rates compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Treatment modality was identified as a risk factor for clinical effectiveness (P < 0.001). Adverse reaction incidence was comparable between the groups (all P > 0.05), except for grade III-IV hand-foot syndrome and decreased appetite. TT showed no significant differences within or between groups (P > 0.05), but APTT and FIB increased significantly after treatment in the observation group, surpassing the control group (all P < 0.05). VEGF and MMP-2 levels decreased significantly after treatment in the observation group, with values lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were markedly higher in the observation group after treatment, with improved PSQI and KPS scores compared to the control group (all P < 0.05). Serum tumor markers (CEA, CA125, CYFRA21-1) also decreased significantly in the observation group (all P < 0.05). VEGF was identified as a risk factor for short-term prognosis (P = 0.047).
The combination of ANB and PD-1 inhibitors demonstrates significant effectiveness in aNSCLC patients, improving coagulation function, serum biochemical indices, immune function, sleep quality, and short-term prognosis without markedly increasing adverse reactions.
探讨安罗替尼(ANB)与程序性死亡-1受体(PD-1)抑制剂联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者的临床疗效。
本研究纳入了2021年1月至2024年6月在上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院接受治疗的400例aNSCLC患者。对照组(192例)接受PD-1抑制剂治疗,观察组(208例)接受ANB + PD-1抑制剂治疗。对两组患者的临床疗效、安全性(恶心呕吐、手足综合征、乏力、食欲减退和贫血)、凝血功能(凝血酶时间[TT]、活化部分凝血活酶时间[APTT]和纤维蛋白原[FIB])、血清生化指标(血管内皮生长因子[VEGF]和基质金属蛋白酶-2[MMP-2])、免疫功能(免疫球蛋白G/A/M(IgG/IgA/IgM))、血清肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原[CEA]、糖类抗原125[CA125]和细胞角蛋白19片段抗原[CYFRA21-1])、睡眠质量(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数[PSQI])和短期预后(卡氏功能状态量表[KPS])进行比较分析。采用二元逻辑回归分析确定影响临床疗效和短期预后的危险因素。
观察组的客观缓解率和疾病控制率显著高于对照组(P < 0.001)。治疗方式被确定为临床疗效的危险因素(P < 0.001)。除III-IV级手足综合征和食欲减退外,两组不良反应发生率相当(均P > 0.05)。TT在组内和组间均无显著差异(P > 0.05),但观察组治疗后APTT和FIB显著升高,超过对照组(均P < 0.05)。观察组治疗后VEGF和MMP-2水平显著降低,低于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组治疗后IgG、IgA和IgM水平显著升高,PSQI和KPS评分较对照组改善(均P < 0.05)。观察组血清肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA125、CYFRA21-1)也显著降低(均P < 0.05)。VEGF被确定为短期预后的危险因素(P = 0.047)。
ANB与PD-1抑制剂联合治疗aNSCLC患者疗效显著,可改善凝血功能、血清生化指标、免疫功能、睡眠质量和短期预后,且不良反应无明显增加。