Suppr超能文献

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)诊断检测:从即时检测到自动化诊断平台的算法与现场评估

SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests: Algorithm and Field Evaluation From the Near Patient Testing to the Automated Diagnostic Platform.

作者信息

Yin Nicolas, Debuysschere Cyril, Decroly Marc, Bouazza Fatima-Zohra, Collot Vincent, Martin Charlotte, Ponthieux Fanny, Dahma Hafid, Gilbert Marius, Wautier Magali, Duterme Cecile, De Vos Nathalie, Delforge Marie-Luce, Malinverni Stefano, Cotton Frédéric, Bartiaux Magali, Hallin Marie

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, LHUB-ULB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

General Practitioner, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 6;8:650581. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.650581. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Since the first wave of COVID-19 in Europe, new diagnostic tools using antigen detection and rapid molecular techniques have been developed. Our objective was to elaborate a diagnostic algorithm combining antigen rapid diagnostic tests, automated antigen dosing and rapid molecular tests and to assess its performance under routine conditions. An analytical performance evaluation of four antigen rapid tests, one automated antigen dosing and one molecular point-of-care test was performed on samples sent to our laboratory for a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription PCR. We then established a diagnostic algorithm by approaching median viral loads in target populations and evaluated the limit of detection of each test using the PCR cycle threshold values. A field performance evaluation including a clinical validation and a user-friendliness assessment was then conducted on the antigen rapid tests in point-of-care settings (general practitioners and emergency rooms) for outpatients who were symptomatic for <7 days. Automated antigen dosing was trialed for the screening of asymptomatic inpatients. Our diagnostic algorithm proposed to test recently symptomatic patients using rapid antigen tests, asymptomatic patients using automated tests, and patients requiring immediate admission using molecular point-of-care tests. Accordingly, the conventional reverse transcription PCR was kept as a second line tool. In this setting, antigen rapid tests yielded an overall sensitivity of 83.3% (not significantly different between the four assays) while the use of automated antigen dosing would have spared 93.5% of asymptomatic inpatient screening PCRs. Using tests not considered the "gold standard" for COVID-19 diagnosis on well-defined target populations allowed for the optimization of their intrinsic performances, widening the scale of our testing arsenal while sparing molecular resources for more seriously ill patients.

摘要

自欧洲第一波新冠疫情以来,已开发出使用抗原检测和快速分子技术的新型诊断工具。我们的目标是制定一种结合抗原快速诊断检测、自动抗原定量和快速分子检测的诊断算法,并评估其在常规条件下的性能。对送往我们实验室进行严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的样本,进行了四种抗原快速检测、一种自动抗原定量和一种分子即时检测的分析性能评估。然后,我们通过接近目标人群的病毒载量中位数建立了一种诊断算法,并使用PCR循环阈值评估每种检测的检测限。随后,针对<7天有症状的门诊患者,在即时检测环境(全科医生和急诊室)中对抗原快速检测进行了包括临床验证和用户友好性评估在内的现场性能评估。对无症状住院患者的筛查试用了自动抗原定量检测。我们的诊断算法建议,对近期有症状的患者使用快速抗原检测,对无症状患者使用自动检测,对需要立即入院的患者使用分子即时检测。因此,传统的逆转录PCR仍作为二线工具。在此背景下,抗原快速检测的总体灵敏度为83.3%(四种检测方法之间无显著差异),而使用自动抗原定量检测可节省93.5%的无症状住院患者筛查PCR检测。在明确界定的目标人群中使用并非新冠病毒诊断“金标准”的检测方法,可以优化其内在性能,扩大我们的检测手段规模,同时为病情更严重的患者节省分子检测资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/613c/8055843/f322cef763a1/fmed-08-650581-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验