Friedman Brittany, Pattillo Mary
assistant professor of sociology and faculty affiliate of the Program in Criminal Justice at Rutgers University.
Harold Washington Professor of Sociology and African American Studies at Northwestern University.
RSF. 2019 Feb;5(1):173-196. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2019.5.1.08.
Monetary sanctions mandated in state statutes include fines, fees, restitution, and other legal costs imposed on persons convicted of crimes and other legal violations. Drawing on content analysis of current legislative statutes in Illinois pertaining to monetary sanctions, we ask three questions: What are defendants expected to pay for and why? What accommodations exist for defendants' poverty? What are the consequences for nonpayment? We find that neoliberal logics of personal responsibility and carceral expansion suffuse these laws, establishing a basis for transferring public costs onto criminal defendants, offering little relief for poverty, and supporting severe additional penalties for unpaid debt. Statutory inequality legally authorizes further impoverishment of the poor, thereby increasing inequality. Major related organizing and advocacy work, however, has created an opening for significant changes toward greater fairness.
州法规规定的经济制裁包括对被判定有罪和其他违法行为的人处以罚款、费用、赔偿和其他法律成本。基于对伊利诺伊州现行与经济制裁相关的立法法规的内容分析,我们提出三个问题:被告预计要支付什么费用以及为什么?针对被告的贫困情况有哪些变通措施?不支付的后果是什么?我们发现,个人责任和监禁扩张的新自由主义逻辑充斥在这些法律中,为将公共成本转嫁给刑事被告奠定了基础,几乎没有为贫困提供救济,并支持对未偿还债务处以严厉的额外处罚。法定不平等在法律上授权进一步使穷人贫困化,从而加剧不平等。然而,主要的相关组织和宣传工作为实现更大公平的重大变革创造了契机。