Fernandes April D, Cadigan Michele, Edwards Frank, Harris Alexes
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2019 Oct;15(1):397-413. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042816.
The Ferguson Report became a watershed moment for understanding the costs and consequences of the monetary sanctions system for communities of color. Since that time, myriad reports, studies, and commissions have uncovered evidence that suggests that Ferguson, Missouri, was not an outlier but rather part of a broader set of systems throughout the country that relied on increasingly punitive assessment and collection strategies for revenue. The growth and expansion of these systems continue to have detrimental and widespread consequences. In this article, we aim to shed light on the current state of monetary sanctions as the full scope and damage of the monetary sanctions system come better into focus on the national, state, and local level. We explore the legal challenges and legislative reforms that are attempting to reshape the landscape of monetary sanctions and lessen the burden on economically disadvantaged individuals and communities of color.
《弗格森报告》成为理解货币制裁体系给有色人种社区带来的成本和后果的一个分水岭时刻。自那时起,无数报告、研究和委员会揭示的证据表明,密苏里州弗格森市并非个例,而是全国范围更广泛的一系列体系的一部分,这些体系依靠日益严厉的评估和征收策略来获取收入。这些体系的增长和扩张继续产生有害且广泛的影响。在本文中,随着货币制裁体系的全貌和损害在国家、州和地方层面上日益清晰,我们旨在阐明货币制裁的现状。我们探讨了正在试图重塑货币制裁格局并减轻经济弱势个人和有色人种社区负担的法律挑战和立法改革。