Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Biostatistics and Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):858-866. doi: 10.1177/03635465211003595. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
Multiple cartilage repair techniques are available for chondral defects in the knee. Optimal treatment is controversial.
To evaluate change from baseline in the 5 Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales among different cartilage repair techniques of the knee.
Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1A.
Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for randomized controlled trials with minimum 1 year follow-up reporting change from baseline KOOS (delta KOOS) subscale values. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. A meta-analysis was performed on the following surgery types: microfracture (Mfx); augmented microfracture techniques (Mfx+Augment); and culture-based therapies, including autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). A random-effects metaregression model was used.
A total of 14 randomized trials with a total of 775 patients were included. The KOOS Sport and Recreation (Sport) and KOOS Quality of Life (QOL) were the 2 most responsive subscales after operative intervention. Outcomes from Mfx and Mfx+Augment were not different in any of the 5 KOOS subscales (minimum > .3). The mean delta KOOS Sport after ACI/MACI was 9.9 points greater than after Mfx ( = .021) and 11.7 points greater than after Mfx+Augment ( = .027). Longer follow-up time correlated with greater delta KOOS Sport ( = .028). Larger body mass index led to greater delta KOOS QOL ( = .045). Larger cartilage defect size correlated with greater delta KOOS Pain and KOOS Activities of Daily Living scores ( = .023 and = .002, respectively).
The KOOS Sport and QOL were the most responsive subscales after cartilage restoration surgery of the knee. Culture-based therapies (ACI/MACI) led to clinically relevant improvements in the KOOS Sport score compared with marrow stimulation and may be a more appropriate treatment in younger and more active individuals. There were no benefits to Mfx+Augment over Mfx alone in any of the KOOS subscales.
膝关节软骨缺损有多种软骨修复技术。最佳治疗方案存在争议。
评估膝关节不同软骨修复技术的 5 膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)亚量表与基线相比的变化。
系统评价和荟萃分析;证据水平,1A。
检索 Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)数据库,纳入至少随访 1 年、报告 KOOS(delta KOOS)亚量表值变化的随机对照试验。遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。对以下手术类型进行荟萃分析:微骨折术(Mfx);增强微骨折技术(Mfx+Augment);以及基于培养的治疗方法,包括自体软骨细胞植入术(ACI)和基质辅助自体软骨细胞植入术(MACI)。使用随机效应荟萃回归模型。
共纳入 14 项随机试验,共 775 例患者。KOOS 运动和娱乐(Sport)和 KOOS 生活质量(QOL)是手术干预后反应最灵敏的 2 个亚量表。Mfx 和 Mfx+Augment 在 5 个 KOOS 亚量表中的任何一个都没有不同(最小值>.3)。ACI/MACI 后的平均 delta KOOS Sport 比 Mfx 高 9.9 分(=.021),比 Mfx+Augment 高 11.7 分(=.027)。随访时间较长与更大的 delta KOOS Sport 相关(=.028)。较大的体重指数与更大的 delta KOOS QOL 相关(=.045)。较大的软骨缺损大小与更大的 delta KOOS 疼痛和日常生活活动评分相关(=.023 和=.002,分别)。
膝关节软骨修复术后,KOOS Sport 和 QOL 是反应最灵敏的亚量表。与骨髓刺激相比,基于培养的治疗方法(ACI/MACI)可使 KOOS Sport 评分得到更显著的改善,可能更适合年轻、活跃的个体。Mfx+Augment 与 Mfx 相比,在任何 KOOS 亚量表中都没有优势。