• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。

The Statistical Fragility of Marrow Stimulation for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cartilage. 2024 Dec;15(4):389-398. doi: 10.1177/19476035241233441. Epub 2024 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1177/19476035241233441
PMID:38403983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528781/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Marrow stimulation is used to address knee cartilage defects. In this study, we used the fragility index (FI), reverse fragility index (rFI), and fragility quotient (FQ) to evaluate statistical fragility of outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating marrow stimulation.

DESIGN

PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were queried for recent RCTs (January 1, 2010-September 5, 2023) assessing marrow stimulation for cartilage defects of the knee. The FI and rFI were calculated as the number of outcome event reversals required to alter statistical significance for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. The FQ was determined by dividing the FI by the study sample size.

RESULTS

Across 155 total outcomes from 21 RCTs, the median FI was 3 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5), with an associated median FQ of 0.067 (IQR, 0.033-0.010). Thirty-two outcomes were statistically significant, with a median FI of 2 (IQR, 1-3.25) and FQ of 0.050 (IQR, 0.025-0.069). Ten of the 32 (31.3%) outcomes reported as statistically significant had an FI of 1. In total, 123 outcomes were nonsignificant, with a median rFI of 3 (IQR, 2-5). Studies assessing stem cell augments were the most fragile, with a median FI of 2. In 55.5% of outcomes, the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than or equal to the FI.

CONCLUSION

Statistical findings in RCTs evaluating marrow stimulation for cartilage defects of the knee are statistically fragile. We recommend combined reporting of -values with FI and FQ metrics to aid in the interpretation of clinical findings in comparative trials assessing cartilage restoration.

摘要

目的

骨髓刺激被用于治疗膝关节软骨缺损。在这项研究中,我们使用脆性指数(FI)、反向脆性指数(rFI)和脆性商数(FQ)来评估评价骨髓刺激治疗软骨缺损的随机对照试验(RCT)中报告结果的统计脆性。

设计

检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 MEDLINE 中 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 5 日的最新 RCT,评估了骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损。FI 和 rFI 分别计算为需要逆转的结果事件数量,以改变显著和非显著结果的统计显著性。FQ 通过将 FI 除以研究样本量来确定。

结果

在 21 项 RCT 的 155 项总结果中,中位数 FI 为 3(四分位距 [IQR],2-5),相应的中位数 FQ 为 0.067(IQR,0.033-0.010)。32 项结果具有统计学意义,中位数 FI 为 2(IQR,1-3.25),FQ 为 0.050(IQR,0.025-0.069)。32 项有统计学意义的结果中有 10 项报告的 FI 为 1。总的来说,123 项结果无统计学意义,中位数 rFI 为 3(IQR,2-5)。评估干细胞增强的研究最脆弱,中位数 FI 为 2。在 55.5%的结果中,失访患者的数量大于或等于 FI。

结论

评估骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损的 RCT 中的统计结果存在统计学上的脆弱性。我们建议结合报告 - 值与 FI 和 FQ 指标,以帮助解释评估软骨修复的比较试验中的临床发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb2/11528781/4503b5cd8cae/10.1177_19476035241233441-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb2/11528781/843a8a2423c2/10.1177_19476035241233441-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb2/11528781/4503b5cd8cae/10.1177_19476035241233441-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb2/11528781/843a8a2423c2/10.1177_19476035241233441-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb2/11528781/4503b5cd8cae/10.1177_19476035241233441-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Statistical Fragility of Marrow Stimulation for Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.骨髓刺激治疗膝关节软骨缺损的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Cartilage. 2024 Dec;15(4):389-398. doi: 10.1177/19476035241233441. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
2
The fragility of statistical findings in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.反式全肩关节置换文献中统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1650-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
3
The Statistical Fragility of Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.全膝关节置换术中髌骨表面置换的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Mar;40(3):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.膝关节软骨修复中统计学显著性的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):147S-155S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211012458. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Statistical Outcomes Guiding Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prevention and Revision Are Fragile: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.统计结果指导人工关节置换感染预防和翻修是脆弱的:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1869-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.059. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in the Femoral Neck Fracture Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.股骨颈骨折文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 1;38(6):e230-e237. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002793.
7
Interpreting the Current Literature on Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Fragility Analysis: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Study of Randomized Controlled Trials.使用脆弱性分析解读机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术结局的现有文献:随机对照试验的系统评价和横断面研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1882-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.044. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
The Fragility of Tourniquet Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.止血带在全膝关节置换术中使用的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1177-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.035. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
The Statistical Fragility of Tranexamic Acid Use in the Orthopaedic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.《矫形外科文献中氨甲环酸使用的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价》。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun 1;32(11):508-515. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00503. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
10
Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.随机对照试验比较骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在前交叉韧带重建术中的应用:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating LET and ALL for Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in ACLR Are Fragile: A Systematic Review.评估LET和ALL用于前交叉韧带重建术中前外侧旋转不稳定的随机对照试验存在缺陷:一项系统评价。
Sports Health. 2025 Aug 6:19417381251360013. doi: 10.1177/19417381251360013.
2
The statistical fragility of vertebroplasty outcomes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.椎体成形术结果的统计学脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):26-33. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_13_25. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Sham Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.假骨科手术中统计学显著性的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov 1;31(21):e994-e1002. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00245. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
The statistical fragility of outcomes in calcaneus fractures: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.跟跟骨骨折结局的统计学脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统回顾。
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Dec;57:102047. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.102047. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
One-stage cartilage repair using the autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis combined with simultaneous use of autologous adipose tissue graft and adipose tissue mesenchymal cells technique: clinical results and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at five-year follow-up.
自体基质诱导软骨再生联合自体脂肪组织移植和脂肪组织间充质细胞技术的一次性软骨修复:五年随访的临床结果和磁共振成像评估。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jan;48(1):267-277. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05921-8. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Statistical Fragility of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Platelet-Rich Plasma Use for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.评估富血小板血浆用于膝骨关节炎的随机对照试验的统计脆弱性:一项系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):23259671231187894. doi: 10.1177/23259671231187894. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
The value - and its historical underpinnings - pro and con.该价值及其历史基础——赞成与反对的观点。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Jul-Sep;17(3):391-393. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_223_23. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
The statistical fragility of the management options for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized control trial with fragility analysis.反向肩关节置换术治疗方案的统计学脆弱性:一项采用脆弱性分析的随机对照试验系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Apr 7;3(3):279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.03.002. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.随机对照试验比较骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱自体移植物在前交叉韧带重建术中的应用:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.039. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
8
Reverse Fragility Index Comparing Rates of Rerupture After Open Achilles Tendon Repair Versus Early Functional Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较开放性跟腱修复术后再破裂率与早期功能康复的反向脆弱性指数:一项随机对照试验的系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1116-1121. doi: 10.1177/03635465231178831. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
The reverse fragility index: RCTs reporting non-significant differences in failure rates between hamstring and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts have fragile results.反向脆弱指数:随机对照试验报告在腘绳肌和骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物之间失败率无显著差异的研究结果存在脆弱性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3412-3419. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07420-0. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
The fragility of statistical findings in distal biceps tendon repairs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.远端肱二头肌腱修复术的统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Aug;32(8):e379-e386. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 17.