Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Environ Technol. 2022 Sep;43(22):3401-3413. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1921856. Epub 2021 May 8.
Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage (HWTS) are recommended to supply the demand for drinking water in communities without conventional water supply systems. However, there is a lack of long-term laboratory studies regarding such technologies. We evaluated the contributions of each step of a multi-barrier system with pretreatment (sedimentation and fabric filtration), filtration in Household Slow Sand Filters (HSSFs) and disinfection (sodium hypochlorite) treating surface water for more than 14 consecutive months. Removal of turbidity, colour, organic matter, coliform group bacteria and protozoa were evaluated. Two HSSF models were compared, one with a diffuser vessel (HSSF-d) and one with a gravity float equipped vessel (HSSF-f). Correlations between efficiency and operational parameters were assessed. Overall, the multi-barrier system removed more than 90% of turbidity and more than 3.5 log of . HSSF removed up to 3.0 log of spp. and 2.4 log of spp. HSSF-f presented significantly higher removal rates for turbidity, apparent colour and . Disinfection resulted in water with concentration lower than 1 CFU 100mL, however it was not able to inactivate protozoa. The evaluated system was able to reduce microbiological risks from water and could indeed be an alternative to communities that depend on surface water as their main source of supply. Nevertheless, further studies are recommended to include a low-cost disinfectant for protozoa inactivation.
家用水处理和安全储存(HWTS)被推荐用于为没有传统供水系统的社区提供饮用水需求。然而,对于此类技术,缺乏长期的实验室研究。我们评估了预处理(沉淀和织物过滤)、家用慢速砂滤器(HSSF)过滤和消毒(次氯酸钠)处理地表水的多屏障系统的每个步骤的贡献,持续时间超过 14 个月。评估了浊度、颜色、有机物、大肠菌群和原生动物的去除情况。比较了两种 HSSF 模型,一种带有扩散器容器(HSSF-d),另一种带有重力浮子设备容器(HSSF-f)。评估了效率与操作参数之间的相关性。总体而言,多屏障系统去除了超过 90%的浊度和超过 3.5 个对数的 。HSSF 去除了高达 3.0 个对数的 spp. 和 2.4 个对数的 spp.。HSSF-f 对浊度、表观颜色和 呈现出显著更高的去除率。消毒导致水中的 浓度低于 1 CFU 100mL,但无法灭活原生动物。评估的系统能够降低水中的微生物风险,确实可以作为依赖地表水作为主要供水源的社区的替代方案。然而,建议进行进一步的研究,包括一种用于原生动物灭活的低成本消毒剂。