• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录风险评分可提前预测入住心脏重症监护病房患者的临床结局。

Electronic health record risk score provides earlier prognostication of clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2021 Aug;238:85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.004
PMID:33891906
Abstract

In this observational study, we compared the prognostic ability of an electronic health record (EHR)-derived risk score, the Rothman Index (RI), automatically derived on admission, to the first 24-hour Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for outcome prediction in the modern cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We found that while the 24-hour SOFA score provided modestly superior discrimination for both in-hospital and CICU mortality, the RI upon CICU admission had better calibration for both outcomes. Given the ubiquitous nature of EHR utilization in the United States, the RI may become an important tool to rapidly risk stratify CICU patients within the ICU and improve resource allocation.

摘要

在这项观察性研究中,我们比较了电子病历(EHR)衍生风险评分(Rothman 指数,RI)和入院后 24 小时序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对现代心脏重症监护病房(CICU)预后的预测能力。我们发现,虽然 24 小时 SOFA 评分对院内和 CICU 死亡率的区分度略高,但 RI 在 CICU 入院时对两种结局的校准度更好。鉴于美国 EHR 的广泛应用,RI 可能成为一种在 ICU 内快速对 CICU 患者进行风险分层并改善资源分配的重要工具。

相似文献

1
Electronic health record risk score provides earlier prognostication of clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.电子健康记录风险评分可提前预测入住心脏重症监护病房患者的临床结局。
Am Heart J. 2021 Aug;238:85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
The association of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at intensive care unit discharge with intensive care unit readmission in the cardiac intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估评分与心脏重症监护病房再入院的相关性。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 May 7;13(4):354-361. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae013.
3
Admission diagnosis and mortality risk prediction in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit population.当代心脏重症监护病房人群的入院诊断和死亡风险预测。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jun;224:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.心脏重症监护病房住院患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统的比较评价
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Predictors of Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存预测因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0328. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Outcomes of Nonagenarians Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit by the Elders Risk Assessment Score for Long-Term Mortality Risk Stratification.通过老年人长期死亡风险分层的风险评估评分,入住心脏重症监护病房的九旬老人的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;120(8):1421-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.028. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Derivation and Validation of a Novel Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Admission Risk Score for Mortality.一种新型心脏重症监护病房入院风险评分模型对死亡率的推导和验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e013675. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013675. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Prospective North American Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Critical Illness.心脏重症监护病房患者的人口统计学、护理模式和结局:重症心脏病学试验网络前瞻性北美多中心心脏危重症登记研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;4(9):928-935. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2467.
9
Variation in risk-adjusted cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay and the association with in-hospital mortality: An analysis from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry.风险调整后心脏重症监护病房(CICU)住院时间的变化及其与住院死亡率的关系:来自重症心脏病学临床试验网络(CCCTN)登记处的分析。
Am Heart J. 2024 May;271:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Predictive value of individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sub-scores for mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对心脏重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测价值。
PLoS One. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0216177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216177. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome Predictions at Two Time Points among Surrogates and Physicians of Mechanically Ventilated Patients.机械通气患者的替代者和医生在两个时间点的结果预测
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1235. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001235. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
2
Are Unselected Risk Scores in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Needed?心脏重症监护病房是否需要非选择性风险评分?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 2;10(21):e021940. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021940. Epub 2021 Oct 18.