• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对心脏重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测价值。

Predictive value of individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sub-scores for mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0216177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216177. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0216177
PMID:31107889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6527229/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) organ sub-scores for hospital mortality risk stratification in a contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult CICU admissions between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were reviewed. The SOFA score and organ sub-scores were calculated on CICU day 1; patients with missing SOFA sub-score data were excluded. Discrimination for hospital mortality was assessed using area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC) values, followed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 1214 patients with complete SOFA sub-score data. The mean age was 67 ± 16 years (38% female); all-cause hospital mortality was 26%. Day 1 SOFA score predicted hospital mortality with an AUROC of 0.72. Each SOFA organ sub-score predicted hospital mortality (all p <0.01), with AUROC values of 0.53 to 0.67. On multivariable analysis, only the cardiovascular, central nervous system, renal and respiratory SOFA sub-scores were associated with hospital mortality (all p <0.01). A simplified SOFA score containing the cardiovascular, central nervous system and renal sub-scores had an AUROC of 0.72.

CONCLUSIONS

In CICU patients with complete SOFA sub-score data, risk stratification for hospital mortality is determined primarily by the cardiovascular, central nervous system, renal and respiratory SOFA sub-scores.

摘要

目的

确定序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)器官亚评分对当代心脏重症监护病房(CICU)人群的医院死亡率风险分层的影响。

材料和方法

回顾 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间成年 CICU 入院患者。在 CICU 第 1 天计算 SOFA 评分和器官亚评分;排除 SOFA 亚评分数据缺失的患者。使用受试者工作特征曲线(AUROC)值评估医院死亡率的判别能力,然后进行多变量逻辑回归。

结果

我们纳入了 1214 例具有完整 SOFA 亚评分数据的患者。患者的平均年龄为 67 ± 16 岁(38%为女性);全因医院死亡率为 26%。第 1 天 SOFA 评分预测医院死亡率的 AUROC 为 0.72。每个 SOFA 器官亚评分均预测医院死亡率(均 p<0.01),AUROC 值为 0.53 至 0.67。多变量分析显示,仅心血管、中枢神经系统、肾脏和呼吸系统的 SOFA 亚评分与医院死亡率相关(均 p<0.01)。包含心血管、中枢神经系统和肾脏亚评分的简化 SOFA 评分 AUROC 为 0.72。

结论

在具有完整 SOFA 亚评分数据的 CICU 患者中,医院死亡率的风险分层主要由心血管、中枢神经系统、肾脏和呼吸系统的 SOFA 亚评分决定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/589f/6527229/b0e1d6080a2f/pone.0216177.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/589f/6527229/5d6e072264d6/pone.0216177.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/589f/6527229/b0e1d6080a2f/pone.0216177.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/589f/6527229/5d6e072264d6/pone.0216177.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/589f/6527229/b0e1d6080a2f/pone.0216177.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive value of individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sub-scores for mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对心脏重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测价值。
PLoS One. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0216177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216177. eCollection 2019.
2
Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对当代心脏重症监护病房人群死亡率的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 10;7(6):e008169. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008169.
3
The association of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at intensive care unit discharge with intensive care unit readmission in the cardiac intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估评分与心脏重症监护病房再入院的相关性。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 May 7;13(4):354-361. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae013.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
5
Calibration and discrimination by daily Logistic Organ Dysfunction scoring comparatively with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients.通过每日逻辑器官功能障碍评分与每日序贯器官衰竭评估评分比较进行校准和鉴别,以预测危重症患者的医院死亡率。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):2003-13. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00009.
6
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
7
Predictive Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and the Initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in Acutely Ill Intensive Care Patients: Post-Hoc Analyses of the SUP-ICU Inception Cohort Study.简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II和初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对急重症监护患者的预测性能:SUP-ICU初始队列研究的事后分析
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168948. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.心脏重症监护病房住院患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统的比较评价
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
Effectiveness of the sequential organ failure assessment, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, and simplified acute physiology score II prognostic scoring systems in paraquat-poisoned patients in the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II及简化急性生理学评分系统II在重症监护病房百草枯中毒患者中的预后评分系统的有效性。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 May;36(5):431-437. doi: 10.1177/0960327116657602. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
10
Predictors of Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存预测因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0328. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatic Biomarker Abnormalities in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Proposed Criteria for Cardiohepatic Syndrome.心脏重症监护病房中的肝脏生物标志物异常:心肝综合征的拟议标准
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 22;4(1):101464. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101464. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease in the intensive care unit.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与重症监护病房内慢性肾脏病合并冠状动脉疾病患者住院病死率的相关性。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Apr 30;29(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01850-3.
3
Association between the shock index on admission and in-hospital mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Mortality in a Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Population.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对当代心脏重症监护病房人群死亡率的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 10;7(6):e008169. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008169.
2
Noncardiovascular Disease and Critical Care Delivery in a Contemporary Cardiac and Medical Intensive Care Unit.当代心脏和内科重症监护病房中的非心血管疾病和重症监护治疗。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):537-543. doi: 10.1177/0885066617741873. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Prospective validation of a near real-time EHR-integrated automated SOFA score calculator.
入院时休克指数与心脏重症监护病房住院死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298327. eCollection 2024.
4
Usefulness of the Quick-Sepsis Organ Failure Assessment Score in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit to Predict Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome.快速脓毒症器官衰竭评估评分在心血管重症监护病房预测急性冠状动脉综合征预后的价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231218705. doi: 10.1177/10760296231218705.
5
Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Polymyxin or Tigecycline as a Rescue Strategy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant in Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦、多粘菌素或替加环素作为治疗血流感染中耐碳青霉烯类细菌的挽救策略:一项回顾性队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 May 12;16:2963-2971. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S409506. eCollection 2023.
6
Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
7
Contemporary Review of Risk Scores in Prediction of Coronary and Cardiovascular Deaths.预测冠心病和心血管疾病死亡风险评分的当代综述
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jan;24(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01620-1. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Use of SOFA score in cardiac arrest research: A scoping review.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在心脏骤停研究中的应用:一项范围综述。
Resusc Plus. 2020 Nov 3;4:100040. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100040. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Mortality risk stratification using artificial intelligence-augmented electrocardiogram in cardiac intensive care unit patients.利用人工智能增强的心电图对心脏重症监护病房患者进行死亡率风险分层。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Jun 30;10(5):532-541. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa021.
10
SOFA score and short-term mortality in acute decompensated heart failure.序贯器官衰竭评估评分与急性失代偿性心力衰竭的短期死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 30;10(1):20802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77967-2.
近实时电子健康记录集成自动序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分计算器的前瞻性验证
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
Acute Noncardiovascular Illness in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心脏重症监护病房中的急性非心血管疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 25;69(16):1999-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.033.
5
The Genesis, Maturation, and Future of Critical Care Cardiology.重症心脏病学的起源、成熟和未来。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 5;68(1):67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.036.
6
Comparative evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring systems in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.心脏重症监护病房住院患者急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II和序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统的比较评价
J Crit Care. 2015 Aug;30(4):752-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
7
Developing the surveillance algorithm for detection of failure to recognize and treat severe sepsis.开发用于检测重症脓毒症识别与治疗失败的监测算法。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
8
Glasgow Coma Scale score dominates the association between admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and 30-day mortality in a mixed intensive care unit population.在混合重症监护病房人群中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在入院序贯器官衰竭评估评分与30天死亡率之间的关联中占主导地位。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
A new severity of illness scale using a subset of Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation data elements shows comparable predictive accuracy.使用急性生理学与慢性健康评估数据元素子集的新疾病严重程度评分显示出可比的预测准确性。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1711-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a24fe.
10
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.罗切斯特流行病学项目历史:半个世纪以来美国人群的医疗记录链接
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Dec;87(12):1202-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Nov 28.