Division of Sports Medicine, Al-Razi Orthopaedic Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7S):S8-S13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Preoperative radiographic assessment of osteophyte and loose body locations is critical in planning an arthroscopic débridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography (CT) in localizing osteophytes and loose bodies.
A consecutive series of 36 patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis was investigated with radiographs and multiaxial 2-dimensional CT prior to elbow arthroscopy. The location of osteophytes and loose bodies was assessed in 9 anatomic locations by 2 fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. The diagnostic effectiveness of both imaging modalities was evaluated by calculating the sensitivity and specificity and compared to the gold standard of elbow arthroscopy. Inter- and intrarater percentage agreement between the observations was calculated using Kappa score.
The mean sensitivity for detecting osteophytes in the 9 different anatomic locations was 46% with radiographs and 98% with CT, whereas the mean specificity was 66% and 21% for radiographs and CT, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity for loose body detection with radiography were 49% and 89%, respectively, whereas CT had a mean sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 47%. The overall inter-rater percentage agreement between the surgeons in detecting osteophytes and loose bodies on radiographs was 80% and 85%, respectively, whereas on CT it was 95% for detecting osteophytes and 91% for loose bodies.
CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. The lower specificity of CT may be due to this imaging modality's ability to detect small osteophytes and loose bodies that may not be readily identified during elbow arthroscopy. Radiographs have an inferior inter-rater percentage agreement compared with CT. CT is a valuable preoperative investigation to assist surgeons in identifying the location of osteophytes and loose bodies in patients undergoing surgery for primary elbow osteoarthritis.
在原发性肘关节炎的关节镜清创术前,对骨赘和游离体的位置进行影像学评估至关重要。本研究旨在评估 X 线和计算机断层扫描(CT)在定位骨赘和游离体方面的有效性。
对 36 例原发性肘关节炎患者进行了连续系列研究,这些患者在接受肘关节炎关节镜检查前均接受了 X 线和多轴向二维 CT 检查。由 2 名上肢关节镜 fellowship培训的医生评估骨赘和游离体在 9 个解剖部位的位置。通过计算敏感性和特异性,并与关节镜检查的金标准进行比较,评估两种成像方式的诊断效果。使用 Kappa 评分计算观察者之间和观察者内部的百分一致率。
在 9 个不同解剖部位,X 线检测骨赘的平均敏感度为 46%,CT 为 98%,而 X 线和 CT 的平均特异性分别为 66%和 21%。X 线检测游离体的平均敏感度和特异性分别为 49%和 89%,而 CT 的平均敏感度和特异性分别为 98%和 47%。两位医生在 X 线上检测骨赘和游离体的总体观察者间百分一致率分别为 80%和 85%,而在 CT 上分别为 95%和 91%。
与 X 线相比,CT 对原发性肘关节炎中骨赘和游离体的检测具有更高的敏感性。CT 的特异性较低可能是由于这种成像方式能够检测到在肘关节炎关节镜检查中不易识别的小骨赘和游离体。与 CT 相比,X 线的观察者间百分一致率较低。CT 是一种有价值的术前检查方法,可帮助外科医生识别接受原发性肘关节炎手术治疗的患者中骨赘和游离体的位置。