Fung France W, Wang Zi, Parikh Darshana S, Jacobwitz Marin, Vala Lisa, Donnelly Maureen, Topjian Alexis A, Xiao Rui, Abend Nicholas S
From the Departments of Neurology (F.F.W., N.S.A.), Pediatrics (F.F.W., N.S.A.), Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (Z.W., R.X.), and Anesthesia & Critical Care (A.A.T., N.S.A.) and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (R.X., N.S.A.), Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; and Departments of Pediatrics (Division of Neurology) (F.F.W., D.S.P., M.J., N.S.A.), Neurodiagnostics (L.V., M.D., N.S.A.), and Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine (A.A.T.), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.
Neurology. 2021 May 31;96(22):e2749-e2760. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012032.
To determine the association between electroencephalographic seizure (ES) and electroencephalographic status epilepticus (ESE) exposure and unfavorable neurobehavioral outcomes in critically ill children with acute encephalopathy.
This was a prospective cohort study of acutely encephalopathic critically ill children undergoing continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). ES exposure was assessed as (1) no ES/ESE, (2) ES, or (3) ESE. Outcomes assessed at discharge included the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Version (GOS-E-Peds), Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), and mortality. Unfavorable outcome was defined as a reduction in GOS-E-Peds or PCPC score from preadmission to discharge. Stepwise selection was used to generate multivariate logistic regression models that assessed associations between ES exposure and outcomes while adjusting for multiple other variables.
Among 719 consecutive critically ill patients, there was no evidence of ES in 535 patients (74.4%), ES occurred in 140 patients (19.5%), and ESE in 44 patients (6.1%). The final multivariable logistic regression analyses included ES exposure, age dichotomized at 1 year, acute encephalopathy category, initial EEG background category, comatose at CEEG initiation, and Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score. There was an association between ESE and unfavorable GOS-E-Peds (odds ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 1.07-4.54) and PCPC (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.05-4.51) but not mortality. There was no association between ES and unfavorable outcome or mortality.
Among acutely encephalopathic critically ill children, there was an association between ESE and unfavorable neurobehavioral outcomes, but no association between ESE and mortality. ES exposure was not associated with unfavorable neurobehavioral outcomes or mortality.
确定急性脑病的危重症儿童脑电图癫痫发作(ES)和脑电图癫痫持续状态(ESE)暴露与不良神经行为结局之间的关联。
这是一项对接受持续脑电图监测(CEEG)的急性脑病危重症儿童进行的前瞻性队列研究。ES暴露情况被评估为:(1)无ES/ESE,(2)ES,或(3)ESE。出院时评估的结局包括格拉斯哥预后量表扩展儿科版(GOS-E-Peds)、儿科脑功能表现分类(PCPC)和死亡率。不良结局定义为从入院前到出院时GOS-E-Peds或PCPC评分降低。采用逐步选择法生成多变量逻辑回归模型,该模型在调整多个其他变量的同时评估ES暴露与结局之间的关联。
在719例连续的危重症患者中,535例患者(74.4%)没有ES证据,140例患者(19.5%)发生ES,44例患者(6.1%)发生ESE。最终的多变量逻辑回归分析纳入了ES暴露、1岁时二分的年龄、急性脑病类别、初始脑电图背景类别、CEEG开始时昏迷以及儿科死亡率指数2评分。ESE与不良GOS-E-Peds(比值比2.21,95%置信区间1.07 - 4.54)和PCPC(比值比2.17,95%置信区间1.05 - 4.51)相关,但与死亡率无关。ES与不良结局或死亡率无关。
在急性脑病的危重症儿童中,ESE与不良神经行为结局相关,但与死亡率无关。ES暴露与不良神经行为结局或死亡率无关。