• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诚实、公开、自豪地支持披露决策,并减少精神疾病患者中的污名化影响:计划效果的概念审查和荟萃分析。

Honest, Open, Proud to support disclosure decisions and to decrease stigma's impact among people with mental illness: conceptual review and meta-analysis of program efficacy.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University and BKH Günzburg, Ulm/Günzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;56(9):1513-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02076-y. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-021-02076-y
PMID:33893512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8429161/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Honest, Open, Proud (HOP; formerly "Coming Out Proud"/COP) is a peer-led group program to support people with mental illness in their disclosure decisions and in their coping with stigma. The aims of this study were to provide (i) a conceptual review of HOP, including versions for different target groups and issues related to outcome measurement and implementation; and (ii) a meta-analysis of program efficacy.

METHODS

Conceptual and empirical literature on disclosure and the HOP program was reviewed. Controlled trials of HOP/COP were searched in literature databases. A meta-analysis of HOP efficacy in terms of key outcomes was conducted.

RESULTS

HOP program adaptations for different target groups (e.g. parents of children with mental illness; veterans or active soldiers with mental illness) exist and await evaluation. Recruitment for trials and program implementation may be challenging. A meta-analysis of five HOP RCTs for adults or adolescents with mental illness or adult survivors of suicide attempts found significant positive effects on stigma stress (smd = - 0.50) as well as smaller, statistically non-significant effects on self-stigma (smd = - 0.17) and depression (smd = - 0.11) at the end of the HOP program. At 3- to 4-week follow-up, there was a modest, not statistically significant effect on stigma stress (smd = - 0.40, 95%-CI -0.83 to 0.04), while effects for self-stigma were small and significant (smd = - 0.24). Long-term effects of the HOP program are unknown.

CONCLUSION

There is initial evidence that HOP effectively supports people with mental illness in their disclosure decisions and in their coping with stigma. Implementation issues, future developments and public health implications are discussed.

摘要

目的

诚实、开放、自豪(HOP;前身为“自豪地出柜”/COP)是一个由同龄人领导的小组项目,旨在支持有精神疾病的人做出披露决定,并帮助他们应对污名化。本研究的目的是提供 (i) HOP 的概念综述,包括针对不同目标群体的版本以及与结果测量和实施相关的问题;和 (ii) 对计划效果进行荟萃分析。

方法

对披露和 HOP 计划的概念和实证文献进行了回顾。在文献数据库中搜索了针对 HOP/COP 的对照试验。对 HOP 疗效的关键结果进行了荟萃分析。

结果

针对不同目标群体(例如有精神疾病的儿童的父母;有精神疾病的退伍军人或现役士兵)存在 HOP 计划的改编版本,但有待评估。试验招募和计划实施可能具有挑战性。对五项针对有精神疾病的成年人或青少年或自杀未遂的成年人幸存者的 HOP RCT 的荟萃分析发现,在 HOP 计划结束时,耻辱感压力有显著的积极影响(smd = -0.50),自我污名化的影响较小,且无统计学意义(smd = -0.17),抑郁(smd = -0.11)。在 3 至 4 周的随访中,耻辱感压力有适度但无统计学意义的影响(smd = -0.40,95%CI -0.83 至 0.04),而自我污名化的影响较小且具有统计学意义(smd = -0.24)。HOP 计划的长期效果尚不清楚。

结论

有初步证据表明,HOP 有效地支持有精神疾病的人做出披露决定,并帮助他们应对污名化。讨论了实施问题、未来发展和公共卫生意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da0/8429161/f60aae4e988e/127_2021_2076_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da0/8429161/06419e1ea5c7/127_2021_2076_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da0/8429161/f60aae4e988e/127_2021_2076_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da0/8429161/06419e1ea5c7/127_2021_2076_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da0/8429161/f60aae4e988e/127_2021_2076_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Honest, Open, Proud to support disclosure decisions and to decrease stigma's impact among people with mental illness: conceptual review and meta-analysis of program efficacy.诚实、公开、自豪地支持披露决策,并减少精神疾病患者中的污名化影响:计划效果的概念审查和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;56(9):1513-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02076-y. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Honest, Open, Proud for adolescents with mental illness: pilot randomized controlled trial.诚实、开放、自豪:青少年精神病患者的试点随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59(6):684-691. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12853. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
Does the peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program reduce stigma's impact for everyone? An individual participant data meta-regression analysis.同伴主导的坦诚、开放、自豪项目是否能减轻每个人的污名化影响?一项个体参与者数据荟萃回归分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1675-1685. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02491-3. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
[Honest, Open, Proud: Concept and Efficacy of a peer-led Program to Provide Support with Disclosure Decisions and Coping with Stigma].[坦诚、开放、自豪:一项由同伴主导的项目的概念与成效,该项目为披露决策及应对耻辱感提供支持]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Mar;46(2):97-102. doi: 10.1055/a-0800-3695. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Efficacy of Coming Out Proud to reduce stigma's impact among people with mental illness: pilot randomised controlled trial.“自豪出柜”减少精神疾病患者耻辱感影响的效果:随机对照试验试点
Br J Psychiatry. 2014;204(5):391-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135772. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
6
Honest, Open, Proud (HOP) for people with mental illness in Hong Kong: a randomized controlled trial.《香港精神疾病患者的诚实、开放、自豪(HOP):一项随机对照试验》
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 May;59(5):769-780. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02545-6. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
7
Adapting Disclosure Programs to Reduce the Stigma of Mental Illness.适应披露计划以减少精神疾病污名化。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):826-828. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700478. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Addressing Mood Disorder Diagnosis' Stigma With an Honest, Open, Proud (HOP)-Based Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.采用基于坦诚、开放、自豪(HOP)的干预措施应对情绪障碍诊断的污名化:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 10;11:582180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.582180. eCollection 2020.
9
Stigma and Peer-Led Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.污名与同伴主导干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 5;13:915617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915617. eCollection 2022.
10
Disclosing the diagnosis of schizophrenia: A pilot study of the 'Coming Out Proud' intervention.披露精神分裂症诊断:“自豪出柜”干预的初步研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019 May;65(3):244-251. doi: 10.1177/0020764019840057. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers, Facilitators, and Impacts of Stigma Among Youth Living with HIV in Lima, Peru.秘鲁利马感染艾滋病毒青年中耻辱感的驱动因素、促进因素及影响
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 17:2025.07.10.25331213. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.10.25331213.
2
Reducing Stigma, Enhancing Psychological Well-Being and Identity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Practices and Future Directions.减少多发性硬化症的耻辱感、增强心理健康和身份认同:当前实践与未来方向的叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 29;13(11):1291. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111291.
3
Misconceptions, prejudice and social distance towards people with alcohol use disorders in China.

本文引用的文献

1
To share or not to share? Evaluation of a strategic disclosure program for suicide attempt survivors.分享还是不分享?对自杀未遂幸存者战略披露计划的评估。
Death Stud. 2023;47(4):392-399. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2022.2076266. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Self-stigma in Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Correlates, and Consequences.严重精神疾病中的自我污名:频率、相关性和后果的系统综述。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Aug 21;47(5):1261-1287. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa181.
3
Outcomes of Ending Self-Stigma, a Group Intervention to Reduce Internalized Stigma, Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.
中国对酒精使用障碍患者的误解、偏见及社会距离
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06595-9.
4
A feasibility randomized controlled trial of an individually delivered, peer support intervention to reduce the impact of psychosis stigma and discrimination for people with psychosis: the let's talk study.一项关于个体化提供的同伴支持干预措施以减轻精神病耻辱感和歧视对精神病患者影响的可行性随机对照试验:“畅所欲言”研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 27;54(16):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002605.
5
Young people's sense of agency and responsibility towards promoting mental health in Brazil: a reflexive thematic analysis.巴西年轻人促进心理健康的能动性和责任感:一项反思性主题分析
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e084996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084996.
6
Parsing stigma's relationship with the psychosocial functioning of youth identified as at clinical high risk for psychosis: evaluating whether symptom stigma or labelling stigma is stronger.剖析被认定为临床精神病高风险青年的污名与心理社会功能之间的关系:评估症状污名或标签污名何者更强。
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 4;226(5):1-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.209.
7
Supportive and non-supportive social experiences following suicide loss: a qualitative study.自杀损失后的支持性和非支持性社会经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 27;24(1):1190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18545-3.
8
Value-related attitudes towards mental health problems and help-seeking barriers: a sequential mixed-methods design investigating participants with reported depressive episodes in rural Northern Germany with and without treatment experience.与心理健康问题相关的价值观和寻求帮助的障碍:一项在德国北部农村地区有和没有治疗经验的报告有抑郁发作的参与者中进行的先后顺序混合方法设计。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05521-9.
9
'Who, When, How to Share': Pilot study of a new disclosure decision-making programme for autistic adults.“何人、何时、如何披露”:为成年自闭症患者设计的新披露决策方案的试点研究。
Autism. 2024 Aug;28(8):2090-2104. doi: 10.1177/13623613231221685. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
10
A mixed method comparison of stigma toward autism and schizophrenia and effects of person-first versus identity-first language.对自闭症和精神分裂症污名化以及以人为本与身份优先语言效果的混合方法比较
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 27;14:1263525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1263525. eCollection 2023.
结束自我污名化的结果:一项减少严重精神疾病个体内化污名的团体干预。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):136-142. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900296. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Longitudinal interrelationships of mental health discrimination and stigma with housing and well-being outcomes in adults with mental illness and recent experience of homelessness.心理健康歧视和污名与住房及有心理健康问题和近期无家可归经历的成年人的幸福感之间的纵向相互关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113463. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113463. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Contextual influences on the impact of a peer worker-led self-stigma program for people with mental health issues: protocol for an interventional implementation science study.情境因素对同伴工作者主导的心理健康问题患者自我污名化项目效果的影响:一项干预性实施科学研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:26. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00002-y. eCollection 2020.
6
"Who to Tell, How and When?": Development and Preliminary Feasibility of an Empowerment Intervention for People Living with Dementia Who are Fearful of Disclosing Their Diagnosis.“告诉谁、如何以及何时?”:为害怕透露诊断结果的痴呆症患者开发的赋权干预措施及其初步可行性。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Aug 14;15:1393-1407. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S257317. eCollection 2020.
7
Supporting mental health disclosure decisions: the Honest, Open, Proud programme.支持心理健康披露决策:诚实、开放、自豪计划。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 May;216(5):243-245. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.256.
8
Corrigendum to Disclosing the diagnosis of schizophrenia: A pilot study of the 'Coming Out Proud' intervention.《公开精神分裂症诊断:“自豪出柜”干预的一项试点研究》勘误
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;66(1):102. doi: 10.1177/0020764019877018. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
9
Intergroup contact and mental health stigma: A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis.群体间接触与心理健康污名:一项比较有效性元分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;72:101749. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101749. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Interventions to Reduce Internalized Stigma in individuals with Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.干预措施减少内化污名在个体与精神疾病:系统评价。
Span J Psychol. 2019 May 14;22:E27. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.9.