• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在内镜切除术后出血情况的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析

Bleeding after endoscopic resection between direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhu He, Li Fudong, Tao Ke, Liu Mingqing, Xu Hong

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;36(9):2363-2374. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15527. Epub 2021 May 5.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15527
PMID:33893748
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Oral anticoagulants are risk factors for post-endoscopic resection bleeding. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis for the risks of post-procedural bleeding (PPB) for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin following endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was used to assess the quality of the studies, the pooled odds ratio (OR) to present PPB results, and the funnel plots to assess publication bias. The Higgins I statistic was employed to determine the variation across studies due to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We reviewed 30 articles. PPB occurred in 586 patients on DOACs and 1782 on warfarin. The patients on DOACs had a significantly lower overall risk of PPB compared with those on warfarin (OR, 0.867, 95% confidence interval, 0.771-0.975; P = 0.017, I  = 1.6%). Cumulative meta-analysis showed that the PPB rate of DOACs has the trend to be lower than that of warfarin with publication year and sample size. For the subgroup of endoscopic submucosal dissection, the PPB of DOACs was significantly lower than that of warfarin (OR, 0.786; 95% confidence interval, 0.633-0.976; P = 0.029, I  = 0%). No significant difference was observed between DOACs and warfarin for anticoagulant strategies, endoscopic procedures, and lesion location.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with warfarin, DOACs have the possibility to significantly decrease the risk of PPB following endoscopic resection, especially for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

摘要

背景与目的

口服抗凝剂是内镜切除术后出血的危险因素。我们旨在对直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)和华法林在内镜切除术后发生术后出血(PPB)的风险进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

两名独立的评价者检索了PubMed、科学网、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评分评估研究质量,用合并比值比(OR)呈现PPB结果,用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。采用Higgins I统计量确定研究间因异质性导致的差异。

结果

我们回顾了30篇文章。服用DOACs的586例患者和服用华法林的1782例患者发生了PPB。与服用华法林的患者相比,服用DOACs的患者发生PPB的总体风险显著更低(OR为0.867,95%置信区间为0.771-0.975;P = 0.017,I = 1.6%)。累积荟萃分析表明,随着发表年份和样本量的增加,DOACs的PPB发生率有低于华法林的趋势。对于内镜黏膜下剥离术亚组,DOACs的PPB显著低于华法林(OR为0.786;95%置信区间为0.633-0.976;P = 0.029,I = 0%)。在抗凝策略、内镜操作和病变部位方面,DOACs与华法林之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

与华法林相比,DOACs有可能显著降低内镜切除术后PPB的风险,尤其是在内镜黏膜下剥离术中。

相似文献

1
Bleeding after endoscopic resection between direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin: Systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在内镜切除术后出血情况的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;36(9):2363-2374. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15527. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Potential of Direct Oral Anticoagulant in Bleeding After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血中的应用潜力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Mar;69(3):940-948. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08271-6. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
The Risk of Postpolypectomy Bleeding in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants compared to Warfarin or Nonanticoagulation: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林或非抗凝治疗相比,接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者息肉切除术后出血的风险:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2022 Dec 17;31(4):467-475. doi: 10.15403/jgld-4607.
4
Influence of anticoagulants on the risk of delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter retrospective study.抗凝药物对胃内镜黏膜下剥离术后延迟性出血风险的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):179-189. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01105-0. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
Postpolypectomy bleeding of colorectal polyps in patients with continuous warfarin and short-term interruption of direct oral anticoagulants.接受持续华法林治疗且短期中断直接口服抗凝剂的患者结肠息肉切除术后出血情况
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.046. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
An Analysis of Delayed Bleeding in Cases of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Due to Types of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Japan.日本结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术因直接口服抗凝剂类型导致的延迟出血分析
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):271-282.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.09.012. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
Therapeutic endoscopy-related GI bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients using warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants: results from a large nationwide database analysis.华法林或直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者的内镜相关胃肠道出血和血栓栓塞事件:来自大型全国性数据库分析的结果。
Gut. 2018 Oct;67(10):1805-1812. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313999. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
8
Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in an Asian Population with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Dialysis: A Population-Based Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂在亚洲透析人群中的有效性和安全性:基于人群的队列研究和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Oct;35(5):975-986. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07108-4. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
9
Periprocedural Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的围手术期结局。
Circulation. 2018 Oct 2;138(14):1402-1411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031457.
10
Clinical impact of the perioperative management of oral anticoagulants in bleeding after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.结肠内镜黏膜切除术后出血中口服抗凝剂围手术期管理的临床影响
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1124-8.