Bainbridge Daryl, Bryant Deanna, Seow Hsien
Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Feb;53(2):188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
Measuring palliative care experience using patient-reported outcomes is becoming important for assessing and improving quality, although most validated outcome tools solely use scaled questions.
We analyzed open-text survey responses from bereaved caregivers to identify strengths and weaknesses in the quality of end-of-life care services and to assess the usefulness of qualitative survey data for quality improvement.
This was a retrospective observational study involving bereaved caregivers of decedents who had received palliative home care services in one of six health care regions in Ontario, Canada. Using the U.K.'s validated Views of Informal Carers-Evaluation of Services survey, respondents were asked what was good and what was bad about the services provided in the last three months of life as separate open-text questions. A qualitative constant comparison approach was used to derive themes from the responses.
Among 330 caregivers who completed the survey, 271 (82%) caregivers responded to the open-text questions: 93% of those commented on something that was good about care and 55% on something that was bad. The care experiences were generally positive, with the exception of specific individuals or settings that were perceived as adverse. The qualitative data were more informative about deficiencies in care compared with the quantitative data.
The qualitative survey data in this study provided key recommendations toward making care more responsive to the needs of dying patients and their families. Capturing the narrative responses of bereaved caregivers is feasible and informative for palliative care program development.
使用患者报告结局来衡量姑息治疗体验对于评估和提高质量正变得越来越重要,尽管大多数经过验证的结局工具仅使用量表式问题。
我们分析了丧亲照料者的开放式调查问卷回复,以确定临终护理服务质量的优势和不足,并评估定性调查数据对质量改进的有用性。
这是一项回顾性观察性研究,涉及在加拿大安大略省六个医疗保健区域之一接受过姑息家庭护理服务的死者的丧亲照料者。使用英国经过验证的《非正式照料者对服务的看法 - 服务评估》调查问卷,受访者被分别作为开放式问题询问在生命的最后三个月所提供服务的优点和缺点是什么。采用定性常数比较法从回复中提炼主题。
在完成调查的330名照料者中,271名(82%)照料者回答了开放式问题:其中93%的人提到了护理的优点,55%的人提到了缺点。护理体验总体上是积极的,但特定的个人或环境被认为是不利的除外。与定量数据相比,定性数据在护理不足方面提供了更多信息。
本研究中的定性调查数据为使护理更能满足临终患者及其家人的需求提供了关键建议。收集丧亲照料者的叙述性回复对于姑息治疗项目的发展是可行且有益的。