Suppr超能文献

钝性脾损伤处理的趋势:脾动脉栓塞的兴起。

Trends in Blunt Splenic Injury Management: The Rise of Splenic Artery Embolization.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.

Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook New York.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2021 Sep;265:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Splenic injury is common in blunt trauma. We sought to evaluate the injury characteristics and outcomes of BSI admitted over a 10-y period to an academic trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult blunt splenic injury patients admitted between January 2009 and September 2018.

RESULTS

The 423 patients meeting inclusion criteria were divided by management: Observational (OBS, n = 261), splenic surgery (n = 114 including 4 splenorrhaphy patients), SAE (n = 43), and multiple treatment modalities (3 had SAE followed by surgery and 2 OBS patients underwent splenic surgery at readmission). The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (47.8%). The median ISS (OBS 17, SAE 22, Surgery 34) and spleen AIS (OBS 2, SAE 3, Surgery 4) were significantly different.  Complication rates (OBS 21.8%, SAE 9.3%, Surgery 45.6%) rates were significantly different, but mortality (OBS 7.3%, SAE 2.3%, Surgery 13.2%), discharge to home and readmission rates were not. Additional abdominal injuries were identified in 26.3% of the surgery group and 2.7% of OBS group. SAE rate increased from 3.0% to 28%; median spleen AIS remained 2-3. Thirty-five patients expired; 28 had severe head, chest, and/or extremity injuries (AIS ≥4).

CONCLUSION

SAE rates increased over time. Splenorrhaphy rates were low. SAE was associated with relatively low rates of mortality and complications in appropriately selected patients.

摘要

简介

脾脏损伤在钝性创伤中较为常见。我们旨在评估 10 年间某一学术创伤中心收治的脾损伤患者的损伤特征和结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 9 月间收治的成人钝性脾损伤患者。

结果

423 例符合纳入标准的患者,根据治疗方式分为:观察组(OBS,n=261)、脾切除术(n=114,其中 4 例为脾修补术)、严重腹腔内出血(SAE,n=43)和多种治疗方式(3 例 SAE 后行手术治疗,2 例 OBS 患者再次入院时行脾切除术)。最常见的损伤机制是机动车碰撞(47.8%)。ISS 中位数(OBS 为 17,SAE 为 22,手术为 34)和脾脏 AIS 中位数(OBS 为 2,SAE 为 3,手术为 4)差异显著。并发症发生率(OBS 为 21.8%,SAE 为 9.3%,手术为 45.6%)差异显著,但死亡率(OBS 为 7.3%,SAE 为 2.3%,手术为 13.2%)、出院回家率和再入院率无差异。手术组有 26.3%的患者存在其他腹部损伤,而观察组仅有 2.7%。SAE 发生率从 3.0%上升至 28%;脾脏 AIS 中位数仍保持在 2-3 级。35 例患者死亡;28 例患者有严重的头部、胸部和/或四肢损伤(AIS≥4)。

结论

随着时间的推移,SAE 发生率有所增加。脾修补术的比例较低。在适当选择的患者中,SAE 与相对较低的死亡率和并发症发生率相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验