Department of Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Department of Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
Due to the evolution of hysteroscopic instruments, therapeutic hysteroscopic procedures are increasingly performed in an outpatient, office-based setting. The most important limiting factor of performing these hysteroscopic treatments is patient discomfort. Procedural Sedation Analgesia (PSA) decreases patient discomfort and anxiety. The main goal of this study is to determine safety, feasibility and patient satisfaction of therapeutic hysteroscopy performed under procedural sedation in an outpatient clinic. Our second objective was to compare 9 mm scopes with smaller diameter scopes.
All consecutive patients suitable for procedural sedation and scheduled for a therapeutic hysteroscopy in the outpatient clinic were prospectively included from February 2014 to November 2018 in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. A variety of therapeutic hysteroscopies procedures was performed including myomectomy, removal of retained products of conception and endometrial ablation. Therapeutic hysteroscopes with 3.8 mm, 5 mm and 9 mm diameter were used. In all selected women procedure time, admission time, pain scores, anaesthesiologic and procedural complications were assessed. All women received a questionnaire on patient satisfaction.
In total 455 patients underwent a therapeutic hysteroscopy. Median procedure time was 11 min (2-63 min) and median admission time was 130 min (30-480 min). Median pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) before, during and after procedure were respectively 0 (0-10), 0 (0-4) and 0 (0-9). Anaesthesiologic complication rate was 4.4 %, all minor. Procedural complications consisted of infection postoperatively (0.4 %), excessive blood loss during procedure (0.6 %) and perforation (0.4 %). Procedure was incomplete in 3.3 % of all procedures. Patient satisfaction was high, as 96 % of the women were satisfied. No differences were found in pain scores, VAS 0 versus 1 after the procedure, between 3.8 or 5 mm and 9 mm scopes.
It is safe and feasible to perform a therapeutic hysteroscopy under procedural sedation in an outpatient setting, with low pain scores and a high degree of patient satisfaction, also when large diameter instruments are used.
由于宫腔镜器械的发展,越来越多的治疗性宫腔镜手术在门诊、基于办公室的环境中进行。进行这些宫腔镜治疗最重要的限制因素是患者的不适。程序镇静镇痛(PSA)可减轻患者的不适和焦虑。本研究的主要目的是确定在门诊进行程序镇静下的治疗性宫腔镜检查的安全性、可行性和患者满意度。我们的第二个目标是比较 9 毫米镜和较小直径镜。
从 2014 年 2 月至 2018 年 11 月,荷兰一家教学医院连续纳入适合程序镇静并计划在门诊进行治疗性宫腔镜检查的所有患者。进行了各种治疗性宫腔镜检查,包括子宫肌瘤切除术、清除残留妊娠产物和子宫内膜消融术。使用 3.8 毫米、5 毫米和 9 毫米直径的治疗性宫腔镜。在所有选定的女性中,评估了手术时间、入院时间、疼痛评分、麻醉和手术并发症。所有女性均接受了患者满意度问卷。
共有 455 名患者接受了治疗性宫腔镜检查。手术时间中位数为 11 分钟(2-63 分钟),入院时间中位数为 130 分钟(30-480 分钟)。根据视觉模拟量表(VAS),手术前、手术中和手术后的中位数疼痛评分分别为 0(0-10)、0(0-4)和 0(0-9)。麻醉并发症发生率为 4.4%,均为轻微并发症。手术并发症包括术后感染(0.4%)、手术过程中失血过多(0.6%)和穿孔(0.4%)。所有手术中,手术未完成的比例为 3.3%。患者满意度高,96%的女性满意。3.8 毫米或 5 毫米与 9 毫米镜之间,疼痛评分、手术后 VAS0 与 1 之间无差异。
在门诊环境下,在程序镇静下进行治疗性宫腔镜检查是安全可行的,疼痛评分低,患者满意度高,即使使用大直径器械也是如此。