Suppr超能文献

神经外科患者对远程医疗的满意度评分。

Patient satisfaction scores with telemedicine in the neurosurgical population.

作者信息

Porche Ken, Vaziri Sasha, Mehkri Yusuf, Christie Carlton, Laurent Dimitri, Wang Yu, Rahman Maryam

机构信息

Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;205:106605. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106605. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of telemedicine in neurosurgery have been widely studied, especially as its implementation into clinical practice boomed at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few studies have investigated telemedicine from the perspective of the patient experience.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient satisfaction scores of telemedicine outpatient clinic visits in neurosurgery in comparison with in-person visits.

METHODS

After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, Press Ganey surveys from 3/1/2019 to 9/15/2020 were evaluated retrospectively from single-institution, academic neurosurgical clinics. Due to the non-normality of our data, stratified Wilcoxon tests were performed with correction for care provider differences. Domain score probability values were corrected for multiple comparisons. Average scores (range 20-100) are documented as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

The response rates were 20% (97 responders) for telemedicine visits and 19% (589 responders) for in-person visits. Patient overall satisfaction score was slightly higher with telemedicine visits compared to in-person corrected for care provider differences (94.2 ± 12.2 vs 93.1 ± 13.4, p = 0.085). The care provider domain demonstrated no statistically significant difference in telemedicine compared to in-person (94.7 ± 14.4 vs 92.4 ± 16.5, p = 0.096). The access domain (93.7 ± 12.3 vs 93.4 ± 12.4, p = 0.999) and overall domains (94.1 ± 12.1 vs 94.4 ± 13.4, p = 1.000) were not found to be different between visit types.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine appears to be a valuable option for neurosurgical patients and is not significantly different to in-person visits in all domains. This study demonstrates that telemedicine visits result in comparable satisfaction scores by neurosurgical patients, and providers should continue offering this option to their patients as we approach the post-COVID era.

摘要

背景

远程医疗在神经外科的益处已得到广泛研究,尤其是在新冠疫情初期其在临床实践中的应用迅速发展。然而,很少有研究从患者体验的角度对远程医疗进行调查。

目的

评估神经外科远程医疗门诊就诊与面对面就诊相比的患者满意度得分。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,对2019年3月1日至2020年9月15日来自单机构学术神经外科诊所的Press Ganey调查进行回顾性评估。由于我们的数据不呈正态分布,因此进行了分层Wilcoxon检验,并对医疗服务提供者的差异进行了校正。对领域得分概率值进行了多重比较校正。平均得分(范围为20 - 100)记录为均值±标准差。

结果

远程医疗就诊的回复率为20%(97名回复者),面对面就诊的回复率为19%(589名回复者)。校正医疗服务提供者差异后,远程医疗就诊的患者总体满意度得分略高于面对面就诊(94.2±12.2对93.1±13.4,p = 0.085)。与面对面就诊相比,医疗服务提供者领域在远程医疗中无统计学显著差异(94.7±14.4对92.4±16.5,p = 0.096)。未发现就诊类型之间在就诊便利性领域(93.7±12.3对93.4±12.4,p = 0.999)和总体领域(94.1±12.1对94.4±13.4,p = 1.000)存在差异。

结论

远程医疗似乎是神经外科患者的一个有价值的选择,并且在所有领域与面对面就诊没有显著差异。这项研究表明,远程医疗就诊的神经外科患者满意度得分相当,随着我们进入后新冠时代,医疗服务提供者应继续为患者提供这一选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验