• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白细胞介素 17A/F 纳米抗体苏内洛单抗治疗斑块状银屑病患者的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、2b 期研究。

IL17A/F nanobody sonelokimab in patients with plaque psoriasis: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.

机构信息

Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Avillion, Northbrook, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1564-1575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00440-2.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00440-2
PMID:33894834
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sonelokimab (also known as M1095) is a novel trivalent nanobody comprised of monovalent camelid-derived (ie, from the Camelidae family of mammals, such as camels, llamas, and alpacas) nanobodies specific to human interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17F, and human serum albumin. Nanobodies are a novel class of proprietary therapeutic proteins based on single-domain, camelid, heavy-chain-only antibodies. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sonelokimab across four dosage regimens compared with placebo in patients with plaque-type psoriasis. Secukinumab served as an active control.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial was done at 41 clinics and research sites in Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and the USA. Participants (aged 18-75 years) with stable moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score of ≥3, a body surface area involvement of ≥10%, and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score of ≥12) for more than 6 months before randomisation, who were candidates for systemic biological therapy were included. Participants previously treated with more than two biologics or any therapy targeting IL-17 were excluded. Randomisation was stratified by weight (≤90 kg or >90 kg) and previous use of biologics. Investigators, participants, and vendors remained masked for the duration of the study, with the exception of each site's study drug administrator (who did not complete any other assessments in the study) and a study monitor who only assessed drug preparation, administration, and accountability. The study sponsor remained masked until all week 24 data were clean and locked. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) using a centralised interactive response technology system to one of six parallel treatment groups: placebo group, sonelokimab 30 mg group, sonelokimab 60 mg group, sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group, sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, or secukinumab 300 mg group. All participants underwent a 4-week screening period, a 12-week placebo-controlled induction period, a 12-week dose maintenance or escalation period, and a 24-week response assessment or dose-holding period. During the placebo-controlled induction period (weeks 0-12), participants received either placebo (at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10), sonelokimab 30 mg, 60 mg, or 120 mg normal load (at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8), sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load (at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10), or secukinumab 300 mg (at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8), with placebo given at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10 in the sonelokimab 30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg normal load groups, at weeks 1 and 3 in the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, and at weeks 6 and 10 in the secukinumab 300 mg group. During the dose maintenance or escalation period (weeks 12-24), participants assigned to the placebo group received sonelokimab 120 mg (at weeks 12, 14, 16, and then every 4 weeks); those assigned to sonelokimab 30 mg or 60 mg groups with an IGA score of more than 1 were escalated to 120 mg and then every 4 weeks, and those with an IGA score of 1 or less stayed on the assigned dose at week 12 and then every 4 weeks; those assigned to the sonelokimab 120 mg groups received sonelokimab 120 mg at week 12 and then every 8 weeks (normal load group) or every 4 weeks (augmented load); and those assigned to the secukinumab 300 mg group received secukinumab 300 mg at week 12 and then every 4 weeks. During this period, placebo was given at week 14 in all groups, except in participants who initially received placebo, and at week 16 in the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group. In the response assessment with dose-holding period (weeks 24-48), participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg or 60 mg groups who had dose escalation to 120 mg remained on the same regimen regardless of the IGA score at week 24. Participants in the secukinumab 300 mg group also remained on the same regimen regardless of IGA score at week 24. Participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg and 60 mg groups without dose escalation, and all participants in the two sonelokimab 120 mg groups (including placebo rollover patients) were eligible to stop the study drug at week 24. Those participants with an IGA score of 0 at week 24 received placebo; these participants resumed the previous dose of sonelokimab every 4 weeks when they had an IGA score of 1 or more (assessed every 4 weeks). Participants in these groups with an IGA score of 1 or more at week 24 continued on the same dosage. All study treatments were administered as subcutaneous injections. The final dose in all groups was given at week 44. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in the sonelokimab groups with an IGA of clear or almost clear (score 0 or 1) at week 12 compared with the placebo group. The primary outcome and safety outcomes were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The study was not powered for formal comparisons between sonelokimab and secukinumab groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03384745.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 15, 2018, and March 27, 2019, 383 patients were assessed for eligibility, 313 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to the placebo group (n=52), the sonelokimab 30 mg group (n=52), the sonelokimab 60 mg group (n=52), the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group (n=53), the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group (n=51), or the secukinumab 300 mg group (n=53). Baseline characteristics of participants were similar among the groups. At week 12, none (0·0% [95% CI 0·0-6·8]) of the 52 participants in the placebo group had an IGA score of 0 or 1 versus 25 (48·1% [34·0-62·4], p<0·0001) of 52 participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg group, 44 (84·6% [71·9-93·1], p<0·0001) of 52 participants in the sonelokimab 60 mg group, 41 (77·4% [63·8-87·7], p<0·0001) of 53 participants in the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group, 45 (88·2% [76·1-95·6], p<0·0001) of 51 participants in the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, and 41 (77·4% [63·8-87·7], p<0·0001) of 53 participants in the secukinumab 300 mg group. During the placebo-controlled induction period, 155 (49·5%) of 313 participants had one or more mostly mild to moderate adverse event; the most frequent adverse events in all participants on sonelokimab during weeks 0-12 were nasopharyngitis (28 [13·5%] of 208 participants), pruritus (14 [6·7%] participants), and upper respiratory tract infection (nine [4·3%] participants). One patient from all sonelokimab-containing groups had Crohn's disease that developed during weeks 12-52. Over 52 weeks, sonelokimab safety was similar to secukinumab, with the possible exception of manageable Candida infections (one [1·9%] of 53 participants in the secukinumab group had a Candida infection vs 19 [7·4%] of 257 participants in all sonelokimab-containing groups).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with sonelokimab doses of 120 mg or less showed significant clinical benefit over placebo, with rapid onset of treatment effect, durable improvements, and an acceptable safety profile.

FUNDING

Avillion.

摘要

背景

Sonelokimab(也称为 M1095)是一种新型三价纳米体,由人源白细胞介素(IL)-17A、IL-17F 和人血清白蛋白特异性的单域骆驼科(即来自骆驼科哺乳动物,如骆驼、羊驼和骆马)纳米体组成。纳米体是一种新型专有治疗蛋白,基于单域、骆驼科、重链仅有抗体。我们评估了 Sonelokimab 在斑块型银屑病患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性,与安慰剂相比,它在四个剂量组中与安慰剂进行比较。Secukinumab 作为活性对照。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、2b 期临床试验,在保加利亚、加拿大、捷克共和国、德国、匈牙利、波兰和美国的 41 个诊所和研究场所进行。符合以下条件的参与者(年龄 18-75 岁):稳定的中重度斑块型银屑病(定义为研究者整体评估[IGA]评分≥3、体表面积受累≥10%和银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI]评分≥12),在随机分组前 6 个月以上接受过系统生物治疗候选者。既往接受过两种以上生物制剂或任何靶向 IL-17 治疗的患者除外。根据体重(≤90kg 或>90kg)和既往是否使用生物制剂进行分层随机分组。在整个研究期间,研究人员、参与者和供应商对研究药物保持盲态,除了每个地点的研究药物管理员(他没有完成研究中的任何其他评估)和一个研究监测员外,研究监测员只评估药物准备、管理和核算。研究赞助商在所有 24 周数据干净并锁定后保持盲态。参与者按照 1:1:1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配(使用中央交互式反应技术系统)到六个平行治疗组之一:安慰剂组、Sonelokimab 30mg 组、Sonelokimab 60mg 组、Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组或 Secukinumab 300mg 组。所有参与者均接受了 4 周的筛选期、12 周的安慰剂对照诱导期、12 周的剂量维持或升级期和 24 周的反应评估或剂量维持期。在安慰剂对照诱导期(第 0-12 周),参与者接受安慰剂(第 0、1、2、3、4、6、8 和 10 周)、Sonelokimab 30mg、60mg 或 120mg 正常负荷(第 0、2、4 和 8 周)、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷(第 0、2、4、6、8 和 10 周)或 Secukinumab 300mg(第 0、1、2、3、4 和 8 周),在 Sonelokimab 30mg、60mg 和 120mg 正常负荷组中,安慰剂在第 1、3、6 和 10 周给予,在 Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组中在第 1 和第 3 周给予,在 Secukinumab 300mg 组中在第 6 和第 10 周给予。在剂量维持或升级期(第 12-24 周),被分配到安慰剂组的参与者接受 Sonelokimab 120mg(第 12、14、16 周,然后每 4 周一次);那些 IGA 评分大于 1 的参与者从 Sonelokimab 30mg 或 60mg 组升级到 120mg,然后每 4 周一次,那些 IGA 评分等于或小于 1 的参与者在第 12 周和第 14 周留在分配剂量,然后每 4 周一次;那些被分配到 Sonelokimab 120mg 组的参与者在第 12 周接受 Sonelokimab 120mg,然后每 8 周(正常负荷组)或每 4 周(增强负荷组)一次;那些被分配到 Secukinumab 300mg 组的参与者在第 12 周接受 Secukinumab 300mg,然后每 4 周一次。在此期间,除了最初接受安慰剂的参与者和 Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组的第 16 周外,所有组在第 14 周都给予安慰剂。在 Sonelokimab 30mg 或 60mg 组中剂量升级到 120mg 的参与者在第 24 周时仍保持相同的治疗方案,无论 IGA 评分如何。Secukinumab 300mg 组的参与者也无论 IGA 评分如何,都保持相同的治疗方案。在 Sonelokimab 30mg 和 60mg 组中未进行剂量升级的参与者和所有 Sonelokimab 120mg 两组(包括安慰剂滚转患者)的参与者,在第 24 周时都有资格停止研究药物。在第 24 周 IGA 评分为 0 的参与者接受安慰剂;这些参与者在 IGA 评分为 1 或更高(每 4 周评估一次)时恢复之前的 Sonelokimab 剂量(每 4 周一次)。第 24 周 IGA 评分大于 1 的这些组的参与者继续使用相同的剂量。所有研究药物均以皮下注射方式给药。所有组的最终剂量均在第 44 周给予。主要终点是与安慰剂组相比,Sonelokimab 组在第 12 周时 IGA 评分为 0 或 1 的参与者比例。主要终点和安全性终点均基于意向治疗进行评估。该研究没有针对 Sonelokimab 与 Secukinumab 组之间进行正式比较的功效。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03384745。

发现

2018 年 8 月 15 日至 2019 年 3 月 27 日,评估了 383 名符合条件的患者,其中 313 名患者入选并随机分配至安慰剂组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 30mg 组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 60mg 组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组(n=53)、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组(n=51)或 Secukinumab 300mg 组(n=53)。参与者在各组之间的基线特征相似。在第 12 周,安慰剂组没有(0.0%[95%CI0.0-6.8])的参与者 IGA 评分达到 0 或 1,而 Sonelokimab 30mg 组的 52 名参与者中有 25 名(48.1%[34.0-62.4],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 60mg 组的 52 名参与者中有 44 名(84.6%[71.9-93.1],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组的 53 名参与者中有 41 名(77.4%[63.8-87.7],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组的 51 名参与者中有 45 名(88.2%[76.1-95.6],p<0.0001),Secukinumab 300mg 组的 53 名参与者中有 41 名(77.4%[63.8-87.7],p<0.0001)。

相似文献

1
IL17A/F nanobody sonelokimab in patients with plaque psoriasis: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.白细胞介素 17A/F 纳米抗体苏内洛单抗治疗斑块状银屑病患者的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、2b 期研究。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1564-1575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00440-2.
2
Safety and efficacy of mirikizumab versus secukinumab and placebo in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (OASIS-2): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study.米尔利珠单抗对比司库奇尤单抗和安慰剂治疗中重度斑块型银屑病(OASIS-2)的安全性和有效性:一项 3 期、多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Sep;5(9):e542-e552. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00120-0. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.古塞库单抗与司库奇尤单抗治疗中重度银屑病(ECLIPSE):一项 3 期随机对照临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):831-839. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31773-8. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial.比美吉珠单抗与乌司奴单抗治疗中度至重度斑块型银屑病(BE VIVID):一项为期 52 周、多中心、双盲、活性对照和安慰剂对照的 3 期临床试验的疗效和安全性。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):487-498. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00125-2.
5
Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial.比美吉珠单抗治疗中重度斑块型银屑病的疗效和安全性(BE READY):一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机撤药阶段 3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):475-486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00126-4.
6
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial.度普利尤单抗治疗外用药物治疗控制不佳的中重度特应性皮炎成人患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、剂量范围的 2b 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 2;387(10013):40-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00388-8. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
7
Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials.尼莫利珠单抗联合局部治疗用于中重度特应性皮炎青少年和成人患者(ARCADIA 1 和 ARCADIA 2 研究):两项复制、双盲、随机对照 3 期临床试验结果。
Lancet. 2024 Aug 3;404(10451):445-460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01203-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
8
Safety and efficacy of secukinumab in patients with giant cell arteritis (TitAIN): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.司库奇尤单抗治疗巨细胞动脉炎患者的安全性和疗效(TitAIN):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;5(6):e341-e350. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00101-7.
9
Comparison of ixekizumab with etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3): results from two phase 3 randomised trials.在中度至重度银屑病中比较依奇珠单抗与依那西普或安慰剂的疗效(UNCOVER-2 和 UNCOVER-3):两项 3 期随机临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):541-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60125-8. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials.在中重度斑块型银屑病中的疗效和安全性(UltIMMa-1 和 UltIMMa-2):两项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照和乌司奴单抗对照的 3 期临床试验结果。
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):650-661. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31713-6. Epub 2018 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances of bispecific antibodies using/application in dermatology: a review.双特异性抗体在皮肤病学中的应用进展:综述
Front Allergy. 2025 Aug 20;6:1668931. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1668931. eCollection 2025.
2
Harnessing Nanobodies for Precision Targeting of Proteoforms: Opportunities and Challenges in Therapeutics and Diagnostics.利用纳米抗体精准靶向蛋白质异构体:治疗与诊断中的机遇与挑战
ACS Chem Biol. 2025 Aug 15;20(8):1817-1827. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5c00329. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
3
Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes After Systemic Treatment for Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
斑块状银屑病系统治疗后的心血管和肾脏结局:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01472-5.
4
Dual anti-cytokine biologic and/or targeted synthetic therapy combination in spondyloarthritis: a narrative review. Are we missing the opportunity for higher remission rates?脊柱关节炎中双重抗细胞因子生物制剂和/或靶向合成疗法联合应用:一项叙述性综述。我们是否错失了实现更高缓解率的机会?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 3;12:1576411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1576411. eCollection 2025.
5
Biologics for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.用于治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病的生物制剂:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01423-0.
6
Nanoscale warriors against viral invaders: a comprehensive review of Nanobodies as potential antiviral therapeutics.对抗病毒入侵者的纳米级战士:关于纳米抗体作为潜在抗病毒疗法的全面综述
MAbs. 2025 Dec;17(1):2486390. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2486390. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
7
Therapeutic Advancements in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.银屑病和银屑病关节炎的治疗进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 16;14(4):1312. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041312.
8
Next-Generation Anti-IL-17 Agents for Psoriatic Disease: A Pipeline Review.用于银屑病的新一代抗白细胞介素-17药物:管线综述
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 May;26(3):307-320. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00928-w. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
9
Interleukin-17 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.白细胞介素-17抑制剂在化脓性汗腺炎治疗中的应用
BioDrugs. 2025 Jan;39(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00687-w. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
10
Association Between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Psoriasis, Psoriasis Comorbidities, and All-Cause Mortality: A Study Based on NHANES.基于 NHANES 的研究:全身性免疫炎症指数与银屑病、银屑病合并症和全因死亡率的关系。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024 Oct;12(10):e70050. doi: 10.1002/iid3.70050.