Suppr超能文献

白细胞介素 17A/F 纳米抗体苏内洛单抗治疗斑块状银屑病患者的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、2b 期研究。

IL17A/F nanobody sonelokimab in patients with plaque psoriasis: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.

机构信息

Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

Avillion, Northbrook, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1564-1575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00440-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sonelokimab (also known as M1095) is a novel trivalent nanobody comprised of monovalent camelid-derived (ie, from the Camelidae family of mammals, such as camels, llamas, and alpacas) nanobodies specific to human interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17F, and human serum albumin. Nanobodies are a novel class of proprietary therapeutic proteins based on single-domain, camelid, heavy-chain-only antibodies. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sonelokimab across four dosage regimens compared with placebo in patients with plaque-type psoriasis. Secukinumab served as an active control.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial was done at 41 clinics and research sites in Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and the USA. Participants (aged 18-75 years) with stable moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score of ≥3, a body surface area involvement of ≥10%, and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score of ≥12) for more than 6 months before randomisation, who were candidates for systemic biological therapy were included. Participants previously treated with more than two biologics or any therapy targeting IL-17 were excluded. Randomisation was stratified by weight (≤90 kg or >90 kg) and previous use of biologics. Investigators, participants, and vendors remained masked for the duration of the study, with the exception of each site's study drug administrator (who did not complete any other assessments in the study) and a study monitor who only assessed drug preparation, administration, and accountability. The study sponsor remained masked until all week 24 data were clean and locked. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) using a centralised interactive response technology system to one of six parallel treatment groups: placebo group, sonelokimab 30 mg group, sonelokimab 60 mg group, sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group, sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, or secukinumab 300 mg group. All participants underwent a 4-week screening period, a 12-week placebo-controlled induction period, a 12-week dose maintenance or escalation period, and a 24-week response assessment or dose-holding period. During the placebo-controlled induction period (weeks 0-12), participants received either placebo (at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10), sonelokimab 30 mg, 60 mg, or 120 mg normal load (at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8), sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load (at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10), or secukinumab 300 mg (at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8), with placebo given at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 10 in the sonelokimab 30 mg, 60 mg, and 120 mg normal load groups, at weeks 1 and 3 in the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, and at weeks 6 and 10 in the secukinumab 300 mg group. During the dose maintenance or escalation period (weeks 12-24), participants assigned to the placebo group received sonelokimab 120 mg (at weeks 12, 14, 16, and then every 4 weeks); those assigned to sonelokimab 30 mg or 60 mg groups with an IGA score of more than 1 were escalated to 120 mg and then every 4 weeks, and those with an IGA score of 1 or less stayed on the assigned dose at week 12 and then every 4 weeks; those assigned to the sonelokimab 120 mg groups received sonelokimab 120 mg at week 12 and then every 8 weeks (normal load group) or every 4 weeks (augmented load); and those assigned to the secukinumab 300 mg group received secukinumab 300 mg at week 12 and then every 4 weeks. During this period, placebo was given at week 14 in all groups, except in participants who initially received placebo, and at week 16 in the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group. In the response assessment with dose-holding period (weeks 24-48), participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg or 60 mg groups who had dose escalation to 120 mg remained on the same regimen regardless of the IGA score at week 24. Participants in the secukinumab 300 mg group also remained on the same regimen regardless of IGA score at week 24. Participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg and 60 mg groups without dose escalation, and all participants in the two sonelokimab 120 mg groups (including placebo rollover patients) were eligible to stop the study drug at week 24. Those participants with an IGA score of 0 at week 24 received placebo; these participants resumed the previous dose of sonelokimab every 4 weeks when they had an IGA score of 1 or more (assessed every 4 weeks). Participants in these groups with an IGA score of 1 or more at week 24 continued on the same dosage. All study treatments were administered as subcutaneous injections. The final dose in all groups was given at week 44. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in the sonelokimab groups with an IGA of clear or almost clear (score 0 or 1) at week 12 compared with the placebo group. The primary outcome and safety outcomes were assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The study was not powered for formal comparisons between sonelokimab and secukinumab groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03384745.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 15, 2018, and March 27, 2019, 383 patients were assessed for eligibility, 313 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to the placebo group (n=52), the sonelokimab 30 mg group (n=52), the sonelokimab 60 mg group (n=52), the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group (n=53), the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group (n=51), or the secukinumab 300 mg group (n=53). Baseline characteristics of participants were similar among the groups. At week 12, none (0·0% [95% CI 0·0-6·8]) of the 52 participants in the placebo group had an IGA score of 0 or 1 versus 25 (48·1% [34·0-62·4], p<0·0001) of 52 participants in the sonelokimab 30 mg group, 44 (84·6% [71·9-93·1], p<0·0001) of 52 participants in the sonelokimab 60 mg group, 41 (77·4% [63·8-87·7], p<0·0001) of 53 participants in the sonelokimab 120 mg normal load group, 45 (88·2% [76·1-95·6], p<0·0001) of 51 participants in the sonelokimab 120 mg augmented load group, and 41 (77·4% [63·8-87·7], p<0·0001) of 53 participants in the secukinumab 300 mg group. During the placebo-controlled induction period, 155 (49·5%) of 313 participants had one or more mostly mild to moderate adverse event; the most frequent adverse events in all participants on sonelokimab during weeks 0-12 were nasopharyngitis (28 [13·5%] of 208 participants), pruritus (14 [6·7%] participants), and upper respiratory tract infection (nine [4·3%] participants). One patient from all sonelokimab-containing groups had Crohn's disease that developed during weeks 12-52. Over 52 weeks, sonelokimab safety was similar to secukinumab, with the possible exception of manageable Candida infections (one [1·9%] of 53 participants in the secukinumab group had a Candida infection vs 19 [7·4%] of 257 participants in all sonelokimab-containing groups).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with sonelokimab doses of 120 mg or less showed significant clinical benefit over placebo, with rapid onset of treatment effect, durable improvements, and an acceptable safety profile.

FUNDING

Avillion.

摘要

背景

Sonelokimab(也称为 M1095)是一种新型三价纳米体,由人源白细胞介素(IL)-17A、IL-17F 和人血清白蛋白特异性的单域骆驼科(即来自骆驼科哺乳动物,如骆驼、羊驼和骆马)纳米体组成。纳米体是一种新型专有治疗蛋白,基于单域、骆驼科、重链仅有抗体。我们评估了 Sonelokimab 在斑块型银屑病患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性,与安慰剂相比,它在四个剂量组中与安慰剂进行比较。Secukinumab 作为活性对照。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、2b 期临床试验,在保加利亚、加拿大、捷克共和国、德国、匈牙利、波兰和美国的 41 个诊所和研究场所进行。符合以下条件的参与者(年龄 18-75 岁):稳定的中重度斑块型银屑病(定义为研究者整体评估[IGA]评分≥3、体表面积受累≥10%和银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI]评分≥12),在随机分组前 6 个月以上接受过系统生物治疗候选者。既往接受过两种以上生物制剂或任何靶向 IL-17 治疗的患者除外。根据体重(≤90kg 或>90kg)和既往是否使用生物制剂进行分层随机分组。在整个研究期间,研究人员、参与者和供应商对研究药物保持盲态,除了每个地点的研究药物管理员(他没有完成研究中的任何其他评估)和一个研究监测员外,研究监测员只评估药物准备、管理和核算。研究赞助商在所有 24 周数据干净并锁定后保持盲态。参与者按照 1:1:1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配(使用中央交互式反应技术系统)到六个平行治疗组之一:安慰剂组、Sonelokimab 30mg 组、Sonelokimab 60mg 组、Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组或 Secukinumab 300mg 组。所有参与者均接受了 4 周的筛选期、12 周的安慰剂对照诱导期、12 周的剂量维持或升级期和 24 周的反应评估或剂量维持期。在安慰剂对照诱导期(第 0-12 周),参与者接受安慰剂(第 0、1、2、3、4、6、8 和 10 周)、Sonelokimab 30mg、60mg 或 120mg 正常负荷(第 0、2、4 和 8 周)、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷(第 0、2、4、6、8 和 10 周)或 Secukinumab 300mg(第 0、1、2、3、4 和 8 周),在 Sonelokimab 30mg、60mg 和 120mg 正常负荷组中,安慰剂在第 1、3、6 和 10 周给予,在 Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组中在第 1 和第 3 周给予,在 Secukinumab 300mg 组中在第 6 和第 10 周给予。在剂量维持或升级期(第 12-24 周),被分配到安慰剂组的参与者接受 Sonelokimab 120mg(第 12、14、16 周,然后每 4 周一次);那些 IGA 评分大于 1 的参与者从 Sonelokimab 30mg 或 60mg 组升级到 120mg,然后每 4 周一次,那些 IGA 评分等于或小于 1 的参与者在第 12 周和第 14 周留在分配剂量,然后每 4 周一次;那些被分配到 Sonelokimab 120mg 组的参与者在第 12 周接受 Sonelokimab 120mg,然后每 8 周(正常负荷组)或每 4 周(增强负荷组)一次;那些被分配到 Secukinumab 300mg 组的参与者在第 12 周接受 Secukinumab 300mg,然后每 4 周一次。在此期间,除了最初接受安慰剂的参与者和 Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组的第 16 周外,所有组在第 14 周都给予安慰剂。在 Sonelokimab 30mg 或 60mg 组中剂量升级到 120mg 的参与者在第 24 周时仍保持相同的治疗方案,无论 IGA 评分如何。Secukinumab 300mg 组的参与者也无论 IGA 评分如何,都保持相同的治疗方案。在 Sonelokimab 30mg 和 60mg 组中未进行剂量升级的参与者和所有 Sonelokimab 120mg 两组(包括安慰剂滚转患者)的参与者,在第 24 周时都有资格停止研究药物。在第 24 周 IGA 评分为 0 的参与者接受安慰剂;这些参与者在 IGA 评分为 1 或更高(每 4 周评估一次)时恢复之前的 Sonelokimab 剂量(每 4 周一次)。第 24 周 IGA 评分大于 1 的这些组的参与者继续使用相同的剂量。所有研究药物均以皮下注射方式给药。所有组的最终剂量均在第 44 周给予。主要终点是与安慰剂组相比,Sonelokimab 组在第 12 周时 IGA 评分为 0 或 1 的参与者比例。主要终点和安全性终点均基于意向治疗进行评估。该研究没有针对 Sonelokimab 与 Secukinumab 组之间进行正式比较的功效。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03384745。

发现

2018 年 8 月 15 日至 2019 年 3 月 27 日,评估了 383 名符合条件的患者,其中 313 名患者入选并随机分配至安慰剂组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 30mg 组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 60mg 组(n=52)、Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组(n=53)、Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组(n=51)或 Secukinumab 300mg 组(n=53)。参与者在各组之间的基线特征相似。在第 12 周,安慰剂组没有(0.0%[95%CI0.0-6.8])的参与者 IGA 评分达到 0 或 1,而 Sonelokimab 30mg 组的 52 名参与者中有 25 名(48.1%[34.0-62.4],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 60mg 组的 52 名参与者中有 44 名(84.6%[71.9-93.1],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 120mg 正常负荷组的 53 名参与者中有 41 名(77.4%[63.8-87.7],p<0.0001),Sonelokimab 120mg 增强负荷组的 51 名参与者中有 45 名(88.2%[76.1-95.6],p<0.0001),Secukinumab 300mg 组的 53 名参与者中有 41 名(77.4%[63.8-87.7],p<0.0001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验