• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Allergy screening including a comparison of prick test results with allergen-coated lancets (Phazet) and liquid extracts.

作者信息

Kjellman N I, Dreborg S, Fälth-Magnusson K

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Allergy. 1988 May;43(4):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1988.tb00900.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1988.tb00900.x
PMID:3389493
Abstract

During an allergy screening of families with a history of allergy in one or more subjects, skin prick tests (SPT) were performed in duplicate in 314 adults. The tests were performed with a new type of lancet with a 0.9 mm long point, loaded either with allergen (Phazet) or used together with standardized extracts (10,000 and 100,000 BU/ml). Wheals obtained with both methods were compared, and related to total IgE concentrations and history. A wheal area of 3 and 7 mm2 was used as cut-off limit. Results with Phazet were close to those with Pharmalgen 100,000 BU/ml. With both methods precision was good for allergens, but less for Phazet histamine than for the corresponding wet test. SPT results obtained with Phazet and 100,000 BU/ml correlated better with history than the results with 10,000 BU/ml. Using a wheal size of 7 mm2 as cut-off limit the efficiency for five tested allergens was 91%. "False positive" tests, possibly indicating an unobserved or latent type of allergy, were found more often with higher serum IgE concentrations. The safety of SPT was confirmed and Phazet was well accepted by nurses and tested subjects.

摘要

相似文献

1
Allergy screening including a comparison of prick test results with allergen-coated lancets (Phazet) and liquid extracts.
Allergy. 1988 May;43(4):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1988.tb00900.x.
2
Allergen-coated lancets (Phazet) for skin prick testing in children.用于儿童皮肤点刺试验的变应原包被采血针(Phazet)。
Allergy. 1989 Jul;44(5):356-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb00458.x.
3
Phazet skin prick tests versus conventional prick tests with allergens and histamine in children.儿童中使用Phazet皮肤点刺试验与传统过敏原和组胺点刺试验的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1990 Feb;64(2 Pt 1):166-9.
4
The batch-to-batch variation of the potency of dog- and cat-allergen-coated lancets. Evaluation by skin prick testing.犬猫过敏原包被采血针效价的批次间差异。通过皮肤点刺试验进行评估。
Allergy. 1993 Jul;48(5):373-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1993.tb02409.x.
5
Comparison between modified skin prick test with standardized allergen extracts and Phazet.标准化变应原提取物改良皮肤点刺试验与Phazet之间的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 Nov;82(5 Pt 1):878-81. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90093-0.
6
Comparison of a new type of skin test (Phazet) with existing skin test methods and the radioallergosorbent test (RAST).一种新型皮肤试验(Phazet)与现有皮肤试验方法及放射变应原吸附试验(RAST)的比较。
Clin Exp Allergy. 1989 Nov;19(6):613-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1989.tb02755.x.
7
Interpreting skin prick tests in the evaluation of food allergy in children.儿童食物过敏评估中皮肤点刺试验的解读
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1998 Nov;9(4):186-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00371.x.
8
Correlation between skin-prick testing, individual specific IgE tests, and a multiallergen IgE assay for allergy detection in patients with chronic rhinitis.慢性鼻炎患者中用于过敏检测的皮肤点刺试验、个体特异性IgE检测和多过敏原IgE检测之间的相关性
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):388-91. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4074.
9
Quantitative skin prick testing. Dose-response of histamine- and allergen-induced wheal reactions.定量皮肤点刺试验。组胺和变应原诱导的风团反应的剂量反应。
Allergy. 1987 Apr;42(3):196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1987.tb02200.x.
10
Improved screening for peanut allergy by the combined use of skin prick tests and specific IgE assays.通过联合使用皮肤点刺试验和特异性IgE检测来改进花生过敏筛查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jun;109(6):1027-33. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.124775.