Magan Tejal, Rapuano Christopher J, Ayres Brandon D, Skeens Heather M, Goyal Vipin, Heersink Sebastian, Meghpara Beeran B, Syed Zeba A, Eagle Ralph C, Milman Tatyana
Department of Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cornea Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;229:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
To characterize the clinical and histopathologic features of actinic granuloma of the conjunctiva.
Retrospective observational case series METHODS: Institutional pathology records between 2014 and 2020 were searched for all cases of conjunctival actinic granuloma. Information collected included age, sex, ocular and medical history, clinical findings, laboratory workup, treatment, follow-up, pathologic diagnosis, and histopathologic inflammation pattern.
Eight eyes of 8 patients, 5 men and 3 women, with a median age of 43 years (mean 49, range 24-83) were identified. Clinical diagnosis was pterygium (n = 4, 50%), inflamed pterygium (n = 1, 13%), pterygium vs conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1, 13%), episcleritis vs inflamed pinguecula (n = 1, 13%), and scleritis vs keratoacanthoma (n = 1, 13%). Of 5 lesions with follow-up information, none recurred following excision with a median follow-up of 9 weeks (mean 19 weeks, range 1-61 weeks). Allergy/atopy was documented in 4 of 7 (57%) patients with available medical information. There were no other systemic associations. Histopathologically, actinic granuloma was associated with pterygium (n = 6, 75%) and pinguecula (n = 2, 25%). All lesions were composed predominantly of histiocytes and a variable number of foreign body-type giant cells associated with a focus of severe actinic elastosis. The inflammatory pattern was giant cell (n = 4, 50%), sarcoidal (n = 2, 25%), histiocytic (n = 1, 13%), and combined histiocytic and sarcoidal (n = 1, 13%).
Conjunctival actinic granuloma has diverse clinical and histopathologic manifestations, which need to be distinguished from other autoimmune, neoplastic, and infectious etiologies. This lesion frequently occurs in pre-existing pterygium and pinguecula and may be associated with allergy and atopy.
描述结膜光化性肉芽肿的临床和组织病理学特征。
回顾性观察病例系列
检索2014年至2020年间机构病理记录,查找所有结膜光化性肉芽肿病例。收集的信息包括年龄、性别、眼部和病史、临床检查结果、实验室检查、治疗、随访、病理诊断以及组织病理学炎症模式。
共确定了8例患者的8只眼,其中男性5例,女性3例,中位年龄43岁(平均49岁,范围24 - 83岁)。临床诊断为翼状胬肉(n = 4,50%)、炎症性翼状胬肉(n = 1,13%)、翼状胬肉与结膜鳞状细胞癌鉴别(n = 1,13%)、巩膜炎与炎症性睑裂斑鉴别(n = 1,13%)、巩膜炎与角化棘皮瘤鉴别(n = 1,13%)。在有随访信息的5个病变中,切除后均未复发,中位随访时间为9周(平均19周,范围1 - 61周)。在7例有可用医疗信息的患者中,4例(57%)记录有过敏/特应性。无其他全身相关性。组织病理学上,光化性肉芽肿与翼状胬肉(n = 6,75%)和睑裂斑(n = 2,25%)相关。所有病变主要由组织细胞和数量不等的异物型巨细胞组成,并伴有严重光化性弹性组织变性灶。炎症模式为巨细胞型(n = 4,50%)、结节病样型(n = 2,25%)、组织细胞型(n = 1,13%)以及组织细胞和结节病样混合型(n = 1,13%)。
结膜光化性肉芽肿具有多样的临床和组织病理学表现,需要与其他自身免疫性、肿瘤性和感染性病因相鉴别。该病变常发生于已存在的翼状胬肉和睑裂斑中,可能与过敏和特应性有关。