• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证脓毒症诱导的凝血障碍评分在脓毒性休克危重症患者中的应用:日本全国多中心观察性研究的事后分析。

Validation of sepsis-induced coagulopathy score in critically ill patients with septic shock: post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter observational study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tama-shi, Tokyo, 206-8512, Japan.

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2021 Aug;114(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4
PMID:33895968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8067778/
Abstract

Coagulation disorder is a major cause of death in sepsis patients. Recently, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring was developed as a new criterion for coagulopathy-associated sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the SIC score for predicting the prognosis of septic shock. We analyzed data from a multicenter observational study conducted from 2011 to 2013. We grouped the participants into those who did and did not use vasopressors, and compared the in-hospital mortality rates of SIC and non-SIC patients. Patients who needed vasopressors were considered to have septic shock. We performed survival analysis adjusted by factors independently associated with mortality. SIC developed in 66.4% of patients who used vasopressors and 42.2% of patients who did not. The in-hospital mortality difference between the SIC and non-SIC groups was statistically significant in those who needed vasopressors (35.8% vs 27.9%, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis indicated that SIC was significantly correlated with mortality risk in patients who used vasopressors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.70; p < 0.01), but not in those who did not (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.81-2.34; p = 0.23). In conclusion, the SIC score might be a good diagnostic indicator of fatal coagulopathy among sepsis patients who need vasopressors.

摘要

凝血障碍是脓毒症患者死亡的主要原因。最近,脓毒症诱导的凝血障碍(SIC)评分被开发为一种新的与凝血障碍相关的脓毒症的标准。我们旨在评估 SIC 评分预测脓毒性休克预后的准确性。我们分析了 2011 年至 2013 年进行的一项多中心观察性研究的数据。我们将参与者分为使用血管加压素和不使用血管加压素的两组,并比较了 SIC 和非 SIC 患者的院内死亡率。需要血管加压素的患者被认为患有脓毒性休克。我们通过与死亡率独立相关的因素进行了调整后的生存分析。使用血管加压素的患者中有 66.4%发生了 SIC,而未使用血管加压素的患者中有 42.2%发生了 SIC。需要血管加压素的患者中,SIC 组和非 SIC 组的院内死亡率差异具有统计学意义(35.8%比 27.9%,p<0.01)。Cox 回归分析表明,SIC 与使用血管加压素的患者的死亡率风险显著相关(危险比 [HR] 1.39;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.13-1.70;p<0.01),但与未使用血管加压素的患者无关(HR 1.38;95% CI 0.81-2.34;p=0.23)。总之,SIC 评分可能是脓毒症患者需要血管加压素时致命性凝血障碍的良好诊断指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/d0286a442186/12185_2021_3152_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/6b042cf61db0/12185_2021_3152_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/b72b7dd0e7b0/12185_2021_3152_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/d0286a442186/12185_2021_3152_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/6b042cf61db0/12185_2021_3152_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/b72b7dd0e7b0/12185_2021_3152_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a00/8067778/d0286a442186/12185_2021_3152_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of sepsis-induced coagulopathy score in critically ill patients with septic shock: post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter observational study in Japan.验证脓毒症诱导的凝血障碍评分在脓毒性休克危重症患者中的应用:日本全国多中心观察性研究的事后分析。
Int J Hematol. 2021 Aug;114(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Evaluation of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients with Septic Shock.评价感染性休克危重症患儿脓毒症诱导的凝血病。
Thromb Haemost. 2021 Apr;121(4):457-463. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718736. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
New criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) following the revised sepsis definition: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide survey.基于修订后的脓毒症定义的脓毒症诱导凝血功能障碍(SIC)新标准:一项全国性调查的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e017046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017046.
4
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Septic Patients: Mixed Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症诱导凝血功能障碍的列线图的开发与验证:回顾性与前瞻性混合队列研究
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb;125(2):108-119. doi: 10.1055/a-2359-2563. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
5
The Value of Heparin Binding Protein in Early Identification of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Disease and Prognosis.肝素结合蛋白在脓毒症诱导的凝血病早期识别及预后评估中的价值
Clin Lab. 2025 Jan 1;71(1). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240714.
6
External Validation of the Two Newly Proposed Criteria for Assessing Coagulopathy in Sepsis.评估脓毒症凝血障碍的两项新提出标准的外部验证。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Feb;119(2):203-212. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676610. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
[Predictive value of sepsis-induced coagulopathy score on 30-day mortality in septic patients].[脓毒症诱导的凝血病评分对脓毒症患者30天死亡率的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Dec;34(12):1263-1267. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220830-00805.
8
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of C1q in Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy.C1q 在脓毒症诱导性凝血功能障碍中的诊断和预后价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241257517. doi: 10.1177/10760296241257517.
9
[The value of coagulation indicators combined with sequential organ failure assessment in assessing disease severity and prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis].[凝血指标联合序贯器官衰竭评估在评估老年脓毒症患者疾病严重程度及预后中的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Nov;36(11):1133-1139. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240424-00374.
10
Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病新诊断标准与国际血栓与止血协会弥散性血管内凝血评分在脓毒症3.0重症患者中的比较:一项回顾性研究
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018 Sep;29(6):551-558. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000755.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病列线图预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Curr Med Sci. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s11596-025-00093-5.
2
Incidence of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (INSIC) Trial: Study Protocol of a Combined Retrospective and Prospective, Multicenter, International, Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Epidemiological Observational Trial.脓毒症诱导凝血病(INSIC)发生率试验:一项回顾性与前瞻性相结合、多中心、国际性、横断面、纵向及流行病学观察性试验的研究方案
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 13;14(12):4222. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124222.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients.弥散性血管内凝血评分系统在脓毒性休克患者中的表现。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 10;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5.
2
Diagnosis of sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and coagulopathy.脓毒症诱导的弥散性血管内凝血及凝血病的诊断
Acute Med Surg. 2019 Apr 1;6(3):223-232. doi: 10.1002/ams2.411. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation and its differential diagnoses.
Protein C in adult patients with sepsis: from pathophysiology to monitoring and supplementation.
成年脓毒症患者的蛋白C:从病理生理学到监测与补充
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Apr 14;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00243-0.
4
Interpretable machine learning model for early morbidity risk prediction in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multi-center study.用于脓毒症诱导的凝血病患者早期发病风险预测的可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 3;16:1552265. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1552265. eCollection 2025.
5
[A clinical investigation of constructing a diagnostic model for sepsis-induced coagulopathy utilizing data-independent acquisition proteomics].利用非数据依赖采集蛋白质组学构建脓毒症诱导凝血功能障碍诊断模型的临床研究
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jan 14;46(1):45-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20241219-00579.
6
Impending sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is associated with increased disease severity in SIC-negative patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective exploratory study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC)前期与SIC阴性患者疾病严重程度增加相关:一项前瞻性探索性研究的二次分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 17;12:1525538. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1525538. eCollection 2025.
7
Clinical characteristics and prognosis analysis of pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection in adults: a retrospective study.成人铜绿假单胞菌血流感染的临床特征和预后分析:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Nov 13;25(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01517-7.
8
Association between liver fibrosis and the in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.肝纤维化与脓毒症诱导性凝血功能障碍患者院内死亡率的关系。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):1136. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10051-6.
9
Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in the management of sepsis.脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC)在脓毒症管理中的应用
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Sep 20;14(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01380-5.
10
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Septic Patients: Mixed Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症诱导凝血功能障碍的列线图的开发与验证:回顾性与前瞻性混合队列研究
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb;125(2):108-119. doi: 10.1055/a-2359-2563. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
脓毒症相关的弥散性血管内凝血及其鉴别诊断。
J Intensive Care. 2019 May 20;7:32. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0387-z. eCollection 2019.
4
Reappraisal of Ventilator-Free Days in Critical Care Research.重新评估重症监护研究中的无呼吸机天数。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):828-836. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-2050CP.
5
External Validation of the Two Newly Proposed Criteria for Assessing Coagulopathy in Sepsis.评估脓毒症凝血障碍的两项新提出标准的外部验证。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Feb;119(2):203-212. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676610. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Nationwide registry of sepsis patients in Japan focused on disseminated intravascular coagulation 2011-2013.日本全国脓毒症患者登记研究(2011-2013 年)聚焦于弥散性血管内凝血。
Sci Data. 2018 Dec 11;5:180243. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.243.
7
Epidemiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation in sepsis and validation of scoring systems.脓毒症中弥散性血管内凝血的流行病学及评分系统的验证。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Role of extracellular vesicles in the development of sepsis-induced coagulopathy.细胞外囊泡在脓毒症诱导的凝血病发展中的作用。
J Intensive Care. 2018 Oct 19;6:68. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0340-6. eCollection 2018.
9
The anticoagulant treatment for sepsis induced disseminated intravascular coagulation; network meta-analysis.脓毒症诱导弥散性血管内凝血的抗凝治疗;网络荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2018 Nov;171:136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
10
Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病新诊断标准与国际血栓与止血协会弥散性血管内凝血评分在脓毒症3.0重症患者中的比较:一项回顾性研究
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018 Sep;29(6):551-558. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000755.