Khan Safeer, Qamar Nauman, Ullah Ihsan
Department of Pharmacy Services, Al-Taaluf National Group of Polyclinics, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Production, Frontier Dextrose Limited, Industrial Estate, Haripur, Khyber Pakthunkhwa, Pakistan.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Oct;21(5):943-952. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1919088. Epub 2021 May 5.
: In this era of cost-conscious health systems, it is of utmost importance to identify and establish the most cost-effective treatment option. However, in the case of peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies there is alack of data regarding economically effective treatment strategies. Therefore, the objective was to conduct an economic evaluation including both costs and benefits of various treatment strategies applied to peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies to estimate the relative cost-effective treatment regimens.: Over the 19 years, seven excellent-high quality economic evaluations of three types of peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies were identified in four countries. Our findings showed that surgery was the most cost-effective therapy followed by same cost efficacy of infiltrative therapy and conservative therapy for peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies. However, the fact that surgery was the most common comparator (n = 6) in our selected studies cannot be neglected.: Due to huge methodological variability, the finding of surgery as the cost-effective treatment strategy remains tentative and the decision about the most suitable clinical and cost-effective therapy should be individualized from case to case. Moreover, the economic evaluation of all possible treatment strategies for peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies over alonger period of analysis is required in future studies.
在这个注重成本的医疗体系时代,确定并建立最具成本效益的治疗方案至关重要。然而,对于周围神经卡压性单神经病,缺乏关于经济有效治疗策略的数据。因此,本研究的目的是进行一项经济评估,纳入应用于周围神经卡压性单神经病的各种治疗策略的成本和效益,以估计相对具有成本效益的治疗方案。
在过去19年中,在四个国家确定了七项关于三种周围神经卡压性单神经病的优秀 - 高质量经济评估。我们的研究结果表明,对于周围神经卡压性单神经病,手术是最具成本效益的治疗方法,其次是浸润治疗和保守治疗具有相同的成本效益。然而,在我们所选研究中手术是最常见的对照(n = 6)这一事实不容忽视。
由于方法学上存在巨大差异,手术作为具有成本效益的治疗策略这一发现仍具有不确定性,关于最合适的临床和成本效益治疗的决策应根据具体情况个体化。此外,未来研究需要对周围神经卡压性单神经病在更长分析期内的所有可能治疗策略进行经济评估。