Suppr超能文献

通过差异检测抵制错误信息:无意识怀疑线索的作用。

Resisting misinformation via discrepancy detection: effects of an unaware suspicion cue.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Memory. 2022 Jul;30(6):695-705. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1917618. Epub 2021 Apr 25.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that contaminating effects of misinformation can be reduced by consciously raising the awareness of eyewitnesses to the discrepancy between the misinformation and the original information (e.g., Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E. F. [1986]. Discrepancy detection and vulnerability misleading postevent information. (4), 329-338. doi:10.3758/BF03202511). We tested whether similar effects could be obtained without conscious awareness, by drawing on the metaphor "something smells fishy" linking fishy smells and suspicion (Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. [2012]. Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. (5), 737-749. doi:10.1037/a0029708). In a pilot study, we established the replicability and generality of previous findings concerning this metaphorical link. We then examined the effects of the smell-suspicion link on susceptibility to misleading post-event information using the misinformation paradigm. Here, the "something smells fishy" metaphor was used to invoke suspicion and increase discrepancy detection. Forty-eight hours after viewing an event, participants received misinformation in a room sprayed with either a fishy or a neutral smell. As expected, unaware exposure to the fishy smell (compared to the neutral smell) increased discrepancy detection (measured indirectly) and resistance to the contaminating effects of misinformation, eliminating misinformation interference and lowering suggestibility on the final test.

摘要

先前的研究表明,通过有意识地提高目击者对误导信息与原始信息之间差异的认识(例如,Tousignant,JP,Hall,D.和 Loftus,EF[1986]。差异检测和易受误导后事件信息的影响。(4),329-338。doi:10.3758/BF03202511),可以减少错误信息的污染效应。我们通过利用将鱼腥味与怀疑联系起来的隐喻“Something smells fishy”,测试了在没有意识的情况下是否可以获得类似的效果(Lee,SWS和 Schwarz,N. [2012]。隐喻效应的双向性、中介和调节:社会怀疑和鱼腥味的体现。(5),737-749。doi:10.1037/a0029708)。在一项初步研究中,我们证实了先前关于这种隐喻联系的发现的可重复性和普遍性。然后,我们使用误导信息范式检查了气味-怀疑联系对易受误导后事件信息影响的影响。在这里,“Something smells fishy”的隐喻被用来唤起怀疑并增加差异检测。在观看事件 48 小时后,参与者在喷洒鱼腥味或中性气味的房间里收到误导信息。正如预期的那样,与中性气味相比,对鱼腥味的无意识暴露(与中性气味相比)增加了差异检测(间接测量)和对误导信息污染效应的抵抗力,消除了误导信息干扰并降低了最终测试的易受暗示性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验