• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童在家中遭受轻伤后前往急诊科就诊的短期结局。

Short-term outcomes in children following emergency department visits for minor injuries sustained at home.

作者信息

Molloy Matthew J, Shields Wendy, Stevens Molly W, Gielen Andrea C

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Present affiliation: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 9016, OH, 45229, Cincinnati, USA.

出版信息

Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 26;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00307-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40621-021-00307-z
PMID:33896423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8071606/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minor injuries are very common in the pediatric population and often occur in the home environment. Despite its prevalence, little is known about outcomes in children following minor injury at home. Understanding the impact of these injuries on children and their families is important for treatment, prevention, and policy. The objectives of our study were (1) To describe the distribution of short-term outcomes following pediatric minor injuries sustained at home and (2) To explore the relationship of injury type and patient and household demographics with these outcomes.

METHODS

Children (n = 102) aged 0-7 years with a minor injury sustained at home were recruited in an urban pediatric emergency department as part of the Child Housing Assessment for a Safer Environment (CHASE) observational study. Each patient had a home visit following the emergency department visit, where five parent-reported outcomes were assessed. Relationships were explored with logistic regression.

RESULTS

The most common type of injury was soft tissue (57.8 %). 13.2 % of children experienced ≥ 7 days of pain, 21.6 % experienced ≥ 7 days of abnormal activity, 8.9 % missed ≥ 5 days of school, 17.8 % of families experienced ≥ 7 days of disruption, and 9.1 % of parents missed ≥ 5 days of work. Families reported a total of 120 missed school days and 120 missed work days. Children who sustained a burn had higher odds of experiencing pain (OR 6.97), abnormal activity (OR 8.01), and missing school (OR 8.71). The parents of children who sustained a burn had higher odds of missing work (OR 14.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Families of children suffering a minor injury at home reported prolonged pain and changes in activity as well as significant school and work loss. In this cohort, burns were more likely than other minor injuries to have these negative short-term outcomes reported and represent an important target for interventions. The impact of these injuries on missed school and disruption of parental work warrants further consideration.

摘要

背景

轻伤在儿童群体中非常常见,且常发生在家庭环境中。尽管其很普遍,但对于儿童在家中受轻伤后的结局却知之甚少。了解这些伤害对儿童及其家庭的影响对于治疗、预防和政策制定都很重要。我们研究的目的是:(1)描述儿童在家中遭受轻伤后的短期结局分布情况;(2)探讨伤害类型、患者及家庭人口统计学特征与这些结局之间的关系。

方法

作为“儿童住房安全环境评估”(CHASE)观察性研究的一部分,在一家城市儿科急诊科招募了102名0至7岁在家中受轻伤的儿童。每位患者在急诊科就诊后都进行了家访,评估了五项家长报告的结局。通过逻辑回归分析探讨了其间的关系。

结果

最常见的伤害类型是软组织损伤(57.8%)。13.2%的儿童经历了≥7天的疼痛,21.6%的儿童经历了≥7天的活动异常,8.9%的儿童缺课≥5天,17.8%的家庭经历了≥7天的生活干扰,9.1%的家长误工≥5天。家庭报告总共缺课120天,误工120天。烧伤儿童经历疼痛(比值比6.97)、活动异常(比值比8.01)和缺课(比值比8.71)的几率更高。烧伤儿童的家长误工几率更高(比值比14.97)。

结论

在家中受轻伤儿童的家庭报告称存在疼痛持续、活动改变以及严重的缺课和误工情况。在这个队列中,烧伤比其他轻伤更有可能报告这些负面短期结局,是干预的重要目标。这些伤害对缺课和家长误工的影响值得进一步考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7179/8074405/fa930b5ebdc2/40621_2021_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7179/8074405/fa930b5ebdc2/40621_2021_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7179/8074405/fa930b5ebdc2/40621_2021_307_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes in children following emergency department visits for minor injuries sustained at home.儿童在家中遭受轻伤后前往急诊科就诊的短期结局。
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 26;8(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00307-z.
2
Pediatric minor injury outcomes: an initial report.小儿轻伤的结局:初步报告。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 May;27(5):371-3. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318216b0e7.
3
Pattern of burns identified in the Pediatrics Emergency Department at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City: Riyadh.在利雅得阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王医疗城儿科急诊科发现的烧伤模式。
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2016 Jan-Jun;7(1):16-21. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.175019.
4
Pediatric Asthma Action Plans: National Cross-Sectional Online Survey of Parents' Perceptions.儿童哮喘行动计划:家长认知的全国横断面在线调查
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Nov 9;3(2):e21863. doi: 10.2196/21863.
5
Pediatric burn injuries in South Africa: a 15-year analysis of hospital data.南非儿科烧伤:15 年医院数据分析。
Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
6
Short-term outcomes of pediatric emergency department febrile illnesses.儿科急诊科发热性疾病的短期预后
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Sep;23(9):617-23. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318149f639.
7
Epidemiology of paediatric minor head injury: Comparison of injury characteristics with Indices of Multiple Deprivation.小儿轻度头部损伤的流行病学:损伤特征与多重剥夺指数的比较
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Factors associated with short-term clinical outcomes after acute treatment of asthma in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科哮喘急性治疗后短期临床结局的相关因素
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Aug;38(2):123-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20031.
9
Electrical injuries in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科的电损伤
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Nov;26(5):604-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70012-9.
10
The national burden of poorly controlled asthma, school absence and parental work loss among school-aged children in the United States.美国学龄儿童中哮喘控制不佳、缺课及父母误工所造成的全国性负担。
J Asthma. 2018 Jun;55(6):659-667. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1350972. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Parental Adherence to Early Childhood Domestic Injury Prevention: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Integrated Behavior-Change Model.理解父母对幼儿家庭伤害预防的依从性:综合行为改变模型的跨文化测试
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;14(8):701. doi: 10.3390/bs14080701.

本文引用的文献

1
National survey of home injuries during the time of COVID-19: who is at risk?COVID-19期间家庭伤害的全国性调查:谁面临风险?
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Nov 11;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00291-w.
2
Child Housing Assessment for a Safe Environment (CHASE): a new tool for injury prevention inside the home.儿童家庭环境安全评估工具(CHASE):一款用于预防家庭内伤害的新工具。
Inj Prev. 2020 Jun;26(3):215-220. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-043054. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
Association Between Unintentional Child Injury in the Home and Parental Implementation of Modifications for Safety.
家庭中意外伤害儿童与父母实施安全改进措施之间的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Dec 1;172(12):1189-1190. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2781.
4
Effect of a model-based educational program for mothers, on home-related injury prevention among under-five-year children in rural Twiserkan, Iran.基于模型的母亲教育项目对伊朗Twiserkan农村地区五岁以下儿童家庭相关伤害预防的影响。
Turk J Pediatr. 2017;59(6):648-656. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2017.06.005.
5
An epidemiological study on home injuries among children of 0-14 years in South Delhi.南德里 0-14 岁儿童家庭伤害的流行病学研究。
Indian J Public Health. 2018 Jan-Mar;62(1):4-9. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_428_16.
6
What injuries should we expect in the emergency room?在急诊室我们可能会遇到哪些损伤?
Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2119-2124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Pain Management in Pediatric Burn Patients: Review of Recent Literature and Future Directions.小儿烧伤患者的疼痛管理:近期文献综述与未来方向
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):335-347. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000470.
8
Unintentional home injuries across the life span: problems and solutions.全生命周期中的非故意伤害:问题与解决方案。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:231-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122722. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Incidence of hot tap water scalds after the introduction of regulations in Ontario.安大略省实施相关规定后热水烫伤的发生率。
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):243-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182789057.
10
Fatal unintentional injuries in the home in the U.S., 2000-2008.2000-2008 年美国家庭内致命非故意伤害。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.022.