Kraft Manuel, Büscher Antonius, Wiedmann Felix, L'hoste Yannick, Haefeli Walter E, Frey Norbert, Katus Hugo A, Schmidt Constanze
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 4;12:638445. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.638445. eCollection 2021.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with a prevalence of up to 4% and an upwards trend due to demographic changes. It is associated with an increase in mortality and stroke incidences. While stroke risk can be significantly reduced through anticoagulant therapy, adequate treatment of other AF related symptoms remains an unmet medical need in many cases. Two main treatment strategies are available: rate control that modulates ventricular heart rate and prevents tachymyopathy as well as rhythm control that aims to restore and sustain sinus rhythm. Rate control can be achieved through drugs or ablation of the atrioventricular node, rendering the patient pacemaker-dependent. For rhythm control electrical cardioversion and pharmacological cardioversion can be used. While electrical cardioversion requires fasting and sedation of the patient, antiarrhythmic drugs have other limitations. Most antiarrhythmic drugs carry a risk for pro-arrhythmic effects and are contraindicated in patients with structural heart diseases. Furthermore, catheter ablation of pulmonary veins can be performed with its risk of intraprocedural complications and varying success. In recent years TASK-1 has been introduced as a new target for AF therapy. Upregulation of TASK-1 in AF patients contributes to prolongation of the action potential duration. In a porcine model of AF, TASK-1 inhibition by gene therapy or pharmacological compounds induced cardioversion to sinus rhythm. The DOxapram Conversion TO Sinus rhythm (DOCTOS)-Trial will reveal whether doxapram, a potent TASK-1 inhibitor, can be used for acute cardioversion of persistent and paroxysmal AF in patients, potentially leading to a new treatment option for AF.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常,患病率高达4%,且由于人口结构变化呈上升趋势。它与死亡率和中风发生率的增加有关。虽然通过抗凝治疗可显著降低中风风险,但在许多情况下,对其他房颤相关症状的充分治疗仍是未满足的医疗需求。目前有两种主要治疗策略:控制心率,即调节心室率并预防心动过速性心肌病;节律控制,旨在恢复并维持窦性心律。控制心率可通过药物或房室结消融实现,这会使患者依赖起搏器。对于节律控制,可使用电复律和药物复律。电复律需要患者禁食并使用镇静剂,而抗心律失常药物有其他局限性。大多数抗心律失常药物有致心律失常作用的风险,在有结构性心脏病的患者中禁用。此外,可进行肺静脉导管消融,但存在术中并发症风险且成功率各异。近年来,TASK-1作为房颤治疗的新靶点被引入。房颤患者中TASK-1的上调导致动作电位时程延长。在房颤猪模型中,通过基因治疗或药物化合物抑制TASK-1可诱导窦性心律转复。多沙普仑转复窦性心律(DOCTOS)试验将揭示强效TASK-1抑制剂多沙普仑是否可用于患者持续性和阵发性房颤的急性转复,这可能为房颤带来一种新的治疗选择。