Armendariz Julia, Tamayo Carla, Slade Justin, Belitskaya-Lévy Ilana, Gray Caroline, Allaudeen Nazima
At the time of research, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System.
At the time of research, was an Internal Medicine Resident, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, and is now an Internal Medicine Physician, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):266-275. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00698.1. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Daily attending rounds (AR) are a cornerstone of teaching and patient care in academic health centers. Interruptions in health care are common and can cause increased risk of errors, incomplete work, and decreased decision-making accuracy. Interruptions to AR may diminish a trainee's capacity to learn and retain information.
We characterized and quantified interruptions that occur during AR.
We used a mixedmethods design combining a prospective observational study with a qualitative study. AR were observed January to March 2020 to characterize interruptions, followed by semi-structured interviews with the observed physicians to elucidate the effect of interruptions on workflow and the educational value of rounds.
There were 378 observed interruptions over the course of 30 AR sessions, averaging 12.6 (range 1-22, median 13) interruptions per rounding session. Bedside nursing staff was the most common source of interruptions (25%) and consultant recommendations was the most common topic of interruption (21%). Most interruptions occurred during patient presentations (76%), and the most common method of interaction was text message (24%). Most team members described negative effects of interruptions, including loss of focus and missing critical clinical information; some also reported that certain interruptions had positive effects on education and clinical care. Interns were more likely to report negative emotional reactions to interruptions.
AR are frequently interrupted for non-urgent topics by a variety of methods and sources. Negative effects included loss of focus, missed information, and increased stress. Proactive communication, particularly between physicians and nurses, was suggested to reduce interruptions.
每日查房是学术医疗中心教学和患者护理的基石。医疗过程中的干扰很常见,可能会增加出错风险、导致工作不完整以及降低决策准确性。查房过程中的干扰可能会削弱实习生学习和保留信息的能力。
我们对查房期间发生的干扰进行了特征描述和量化。
我们采用了一种混合方法设计,将前瞻性观察性研究与定性研究相结合。于2020年1月至3月对查房进行观察以描述干扰情况,随后对被观察的医生进行半结构化访谈,以阐明干扰对工作流程的影响以及查房的教育价值。
在30次查房过程中观察到378次干扰,每次查房平均有12.6次(范围1 - 22次,中位数13次)干扰。床边护理人员是最常见的干扰源(25%),会诊建议是最常见的干扰话题(21%)。大多数干扰发生在患者病情汇报期间(76%),最常见的互动方式是短信(24%)。大多数团队成员描述了干扰的负面影响,包括注意力不集中和错过关键临床信息;一些人还报告说某些干扰对教育和临床护理有积极影响。实习生更有可能报告对干扰产生负面情绪反应。
查房经常因各种方式和来源被非紧急话题打断。负面影响包括注意力不集中、信息遗漏和压力增加。建议进行积极沟通,尤其是医生和护士之间,以减少干扰。