Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Singapore, Singapore.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):655-663. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007333. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
Interruptions and multitasking have been demonstrated in experimental studies to reduce individuals' task performance. These behaviours are frequently used by clinicians in high-workload, dynamic clinical environments, yet their effects have rarely been studied.
To assess the relative contributions of interruptions and multitasking by emergency physicians to prescribing errors.
36 emergency physicians were shadowed over 120 hours. All tasks, interruptions and instances of multitasking were recorded. Physicians' working memory capacity (WMC) and preference for multitasking were assessed using the Operation Span Task (OSPAN) and Inventory of Polychronic Values. Following observation, physicians were asked about their sleep in the previous 24 hours. Prescribing errors were used as a measure of task performance. We performed multivariate analysis of prescribing error rates to determine associations with interruptions and multitasking, also considering physician seniority, age, psychometric measures, workload and sleep.
Physicians experienced 7.9 interruptions/hour. 28 clinicians were observed prescribing 239 medication orders which contained 208 prescribing errors. While prescribing, clinicians were interrupted 9.4 times/hour. Error rates increased significantly if physicians were interrupted (rate ratio (RR) 2.82; 95% CI 1.23 to 6.49) or multitasked (RR 1.86; 95% CI 1.35 to 2.56) while prescribing. Having below-average sleep showed a >15-fold increase in clinical error rate (RR 16.44; 95% CI 4.84 to 55.81). WMC was protective against errors; for every 10-point increase on the 75-point OSPAN, a 19% decrease in prescribing errors was observed. There was no effect of polychronicity, workload, physician gender or above-average sleep on error rates.
Interruptions, multitasking and poor sleep were associated with significantly increased rates of prescribing errors among emergency physicians. WMC mitigated the negative influence of these factors to an extent. These results confirm experimental findings in other fields and raise questions about the acceptability of the high rates of multitasking and interruption in clinical environments.
在实验研究中,中断和多任务处理已被证明会降低个体的任务表现。这些行为在高工作量、动态临床环境中经常被临床医生使用,但它们的影响很少被研究。
评估急诊医师的中断和多任务处理对处方错误的相对贡献。
对 36 名急诊医师进行了 120 小时的跟踪观察。记录了所有任务、中断和多任务处理实例。使用操作跨度任务(OSPAN)和多任务偏好量表评估医生的工作记忆容量(WMC)。观察结束后,医生被问及他们在前 24 小时的睡眠情况。将处方错误作为任务表现的衡量标准。我们对处方错误率进行了多变量分析,以确定与中断和多任务处理的关联,同时考虑了医生的资历、年龄、心理测量学指标、工作量和睡眠。
医生每小时经历 7.9 次中断。28 名医生观察到开具了 239 份药物医嘱,其中包含 208 份处方错误。在开处方时,医生每小时被打断 9.4 次。如果医生在开处方时被打断(率比(RR)2.82;95%可信区间 1.23 至 6.49)或多任务处理(RR 1.86;95%可信区间 1.35 至 2.56),错误率会显著增加。睡眠质量低于平均水平的医生的临床错误率增加了 15 倍以上(RR 16.44;95%可信区间 4.84 至 55.81)。WMC 对错误有保护作用;OSPAN 每增加 10 分,处方错误率就会降低 19%。多任务处理、工作量、医生性别或高于平均水平的睡眠对错误率没有影响。
中断、多任务处理和睡眠质量差与急诊医师处方错误率显著增加有关。WMC 在一定程度上减轻了这些因素的负面影响。这些结果证实了其他领域的实验结果,并对临床环境中高频率的多任务处理和中断的可接受性提出了质疑。