• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在毕业后医学教育申请、面试和匹配过程中,住院医师培训项目对美国医师执照考试第一步成绩进行盲法处理的可行性。

The Feasibility of Blinding Residency Programs to USMLE Step 1 Scores During GME Application, Interview, and Match Processes.

作者信息

Smith Kathy W, Amini Richard, Banerjee Madhulika, Clemens Conrad J

机构信息

All authors are with the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson.

is Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, and Assistant Dean of Student Affairs.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):276-280. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00653.1. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-20-00653.1
PMID:33897962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054599/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the recent announcement that Step 1 score reporting will soon change to pass/fail, residency programs will need to reconsider their recruitment processes.

OBJECTIVE

We (1) evaluated the feasibility of blinding residency programs to applicants' Step 1 scores and their number of attempts throughout the recruitment process; (2) described the selection process that resulted from the blinding; and (3) reviewed if a program's initial rank list, created before scores were known, would be changed before submission for the Match.

METHODS

During the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 recruitment seasons, all programs at a single sponsoring institution were invited to develop selection criteria in the absence of Step 1 data, and to remain blinded to this data throughout recruitment. Participating programs were surveyed to determine factors affecting feasibility and metrics used for residency selection. Once unblinded to Step 1 scores, programs had the option to change their initial rank lists.

RESULTS

Of 24 residency programs, 4 participated (17%) in the first year: emergency medicine, neurology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. The second year had the same participants, with the addition of family and community medicine and radiation oncology (n = 6, 25%). Each program was able to determine mission-specific qualities in the absence of Step 1 data. In both years, one program made changes to the final rank list.

CONCLUSIONS

It was feasible for programs to establish metrics for residency recruitment in the absence of Step 1 data, and most programs made no changes to final rank lists after Step 1 scores were known.

摘要

背景

随着近期宣布第一步考试成绩报告将很快改为通过/不通过,住院医师培训项目将需要重新考虑其招聘流程。

目的

我们(1)评估了在整个招聘过程中对住院医师培训项目隐瞒申请人第一步考试成绩及其考试次数的可行性;(2)描述了因隐瞒而产生的选拔过程;(3)审查了在知晓成绩之前创建的项目初始排名列表在提交匹配之前是否会发生变化。

方法

在2018 - 2019年和2019 - 2020年招聘季期间,邀请了一个主办机构的所有项目在没有第一步考试数据的情况下制定选拔标准,并在整个招聘过程中对该数据保持不知情。对参与项目进行调查,以确定影响可行性的因素以及用于住院医师选拔的指标。一旦得知第一步考试成绩,项目可以选择更改其初始排名列表。

结果

在24个住院医师培训项目中,第一年有4个项目(17%)参与:急诊医学、神经学、儿科学和精神病学。第二年参与项目相同,另外还有家庭和社区医学以及放射肿瘤学项目(n = 6,25%)。每个项目都能够在没有第一步考试数据的情况下确定特定任务所需的素质。在这两年中,有一个项目对最终排名列表进行了更改。

结论

对于项目来说,在没有第一步考试数据的情况下为住院医师招聘制定指标是可行的,并且在得知第一步考试成绩后,大多数项目对最终排名列表没有进行更改。

相似文献

1
The Feasibility of Blinding Residency Programs to USMLE Step 1 Scores During GME Application, Interview, and Match Processes.在毕业后医学教育申请、面试和匹配过程中,住院医师培训项目对美国医师执照考试第一步成绩进行盲法处理的可行性。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):276-280. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00653.1. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
General Surgery Residency Application Evaluation in a USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail World: A Retrospective Comparison.美国医师执照考试第 1 阶段通过/不通过世界中的普通外科住院医师申请评估:回顾性比较。
J Surg Res. 2021 Sep;265:317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Reducing implicit bias in the neurosurgery application and interview process: a single-institution experience.减少神经外科学术申请和面试过程中的隐性偏见:单机构经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Nov;55(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.FOCUS23414.
4
What Predicts Performance? A Multicenter Study Examining the Association Between Resident Performance, Rank List Position, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scores.什么能预测成绩?一项多中心研究,考察住院医师成绩、排名列表位置与美国医师执照考试第一步分数之间的关联。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
5
New Heuristics to Stratify Applicants: Predictors of General Surgery Residency Applicant Step 1 Scores.新的分层方法:普通外科住院医师申请人 Step1 成绩的预测因素。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Mar-Apr;79(2):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Post-interview Thank-you Communications Influence Both Applicant and Residency Program Rank Lists in Emergency Medicine.面试后感谢信对急诊医学的申请人和住院医师项目排名均有影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 9;21(1):96-101. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44031.
7
Do Interviews Really Matter in Generating Programs and Applicants' Rank Lists for the Match?面试真的对生成匹配的程序和申请人的排名列表有影响吗?
South Med J. 2022 Apr;115(4):239-243. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001384.
8
Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.在被选中参加面试的普通外科申请者中,代表性不足的少数族裔所占比例较低。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e15-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.与独立外科住院医师培训项目排名选拔相关的申请人特征。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021.
10
How well will you FIT? Use of a modified MMI to assess applicants' compatibility with an emergency medicine residency program.你将有多契合?使用改良后的多元迷你面试来评估申请者与急诊医学住院医师培训项目的适配性。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 2;21:29587. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29587. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection and Recruitment Strategies among Competitive Pediatric Training Programs and the Impact of Diversity.竞争激烈的儿科培训项目中的选拔和招募策略以及多样性的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
USMLE Step 2 CK: Best Predictor of Multimodal Performance in an Internal Medicine Residency.美国医师执照考试第二步临床知识考试:内科住院医师多模式表现的最佳预测指标。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):412-419. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00099.1.
2
Matching Our Mission: A Strategic Plan to Create a Diverse Family Medicine Residency.匹配我们的使命:创建多元化家庭医学住院医师培训项目的战略计划。
Fam Med. 2019 Jan;51(1):31-36. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.955445.
3
Examining Demographics, Prior Academic Performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores.考察人口统计学特征、既往学业表现和美国医师执照考试成绩。
Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):364-370. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366.
4
Positive predictive value of medical student specialty choices.医学生专业选择的阳性预测值。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x.
5
Comparative values of medical school assessments in the prediction of internship performance.医学院校评估在预测实习表现方面的比较价值。
Med Teach. 2018 Dec;40(12):1287-1292. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1430353. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Improving the Medical Student Performance Evaluation to Facilitate Resident Selection.改进医学生绩效评估以促进住院医师选拔。
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1475-1479. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001386.
7
The effect of blinded versus nonblinded interviews in the resident selection process.住院医师选拔过程中盲法面试与非盲法面试的效果。
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):349-53. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00051.1.
8
Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 scores valid measures for postgraduate medical residency selection decisions?美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和第 2 步的成绩是否可作为研究生医学住院医师选拔决策的有效衡量标准?
Acad Med. 2011 Jan;86(1):48-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffacdb.