Lewis Kadriye O, Hathaway Susan B, Bratcher Denise, Blowey Douglas, Knapp Jane F
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate Medical Education, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Apr 20;13(4):e14585. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14585.
Introduction Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME's) Milestones assessment requirement has placed new demands on Program Directors (PDs), especially those with limited knowledge of assessment and evaluation activities. There is a lack of clarity on how Program Director (PDs)/Associate PDs (APDs) are effectively implementing milestones assessment and evaluation practices in the Graduate Medical Education programs. The purpose of this study was to investigate current assessment practices, needs, and challenges of PDs in implementing milestones assessment within their residency and fellowship programs in a pediatric hospital setting. Methods This study used a collective case study approach to obtain information from PDs, APDs, and Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) Chairs in 19 graduate programs at a pediatric hospital. We used structured meetings with planned agendas and a pre-formatted template to itemize program needs/difficulties/challenges in the milestone assessment. We used cross-case thematic content anal-ysis to identify categories and themes to compare differences and commonalities across programs. Results A total of 38 PDs, APDs, and CCC Chairs from 19 different specialties/subspe-cialties participated in this study. Thirteen types of assessment and evaluation tools were consistently used across programs. Three categories emerged in relation to those assessment and evaluation types (direct, indirect, and multi-source). Rotation evaluation (84.2%), direct observation (73.2%), and 360-degree assessment (68.4%) were primarily used for measuring patient care among the six core competencies. Programs' needs varied from curriculum and assessment tool development to alignment of milestones items, and to creating a sys-tematic assessment management plan. The most common challenges were difficulties related to logistics and tracking of evaluation in the survey management system (52.6%), challenges with time management (47.3%), and difficulty in determining and interpret-ing the milestones' numbers and levels (31.5%). Conclusions Milestones assessment and evaluation in medical education can be a challenge, but a priority for many training programs. Our study indicated that milestones assessment and evaluation in medical education are far more com-plex than we expect. Multiple assessment methods must be utilized to evaluate all essential competencies for accurate measurement of trainees' performance abilities. Our study uncovered several issues PDs faced during the implementation of milestones assessment and needs and challenges.
引言 研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的里程碑评估要求对项目主任(PD)提出了新的要求,尤其是那些对评估和评价活动了解有限的项目主任。对于项目主任(PD)/副主任项目主任(APD)如何在研究生医学教育项目中有效实施里程碑评估和评价实践,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查儿科医院环境中住院医师培训和专科 fellowship 培训项目的项目主任在实施里程碑评估时当前的评估实践、需求和挑战。方法 本研究采用集体案例研究方法,从一家儿科医院的19个研究生项目的项目主任、副主任项目主任和临床能力委员会(CCC)主席那里获取信息。我们通过有计划议程的结构化会议和预先格式化的模板,列出里程碑评估中的项目需求/困难/挑战。我们使用跨案例主题内容分析来识别类别和主题,以比较各项目之间的差异和共性。结果 来自19个不同专业/亚专业的38名项目主任、副主任项目主任和CCC主席参与了本研究。各项目一致使用了13种评估和评价工具。与这些评估和评价类型相关出现了三类(直接、间接和多源)。在六项核心能力中,轮转评估(84.2%)、直接观察(73.2%)和360度评估(68.4%)主要用于衡量患者护理。各项目的需求各不相同,从课程和评估工具开发到里程碑项目的一致性,再到制定系统的评估管理计划。最常见的挑战是调查管理系统中与评估的后勤和跟踪相关的困难(52.6%)、时间管理方面的挑战(47.3%)以及确定和解释里程碑的数字和水平的困难(31.5%)。结论 医学教育中的里程碑评估和评价可能是一项挑战,但对许多培训项目来说是一个优先事项。我们的研究表明,医学教育中的里程碑评估和评价比我们预期的要复杂得多。必须采用多种评估方法来评估所有基本能力,以准确衡量学员的表现能力。我们的研究揭示了项目主任在实施里程碑评估过程中面临的几个问题以及需求和挑战。