Solverson Kevin, Humphreys Christopher, Liang Zhiying, Prosperi-Porta Graeme, Andruchow James E, Boiteau Paul, Ferland Andre, Herget Eric, Helmersen Doug, Weatherald Jason
Dept of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Dept of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Apr 19;7(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00879-2020. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has a wide spectrum of outcomes, but the best method to risk-stratify normotensive patients for adverse outcomes remains unclear.
A multicentre retrospective cohort study of acute PE patients admitted from emergency departments in Calgary, Canada, between 2012 and 2017 was used to develop a refined acute PE risk score. The composite primary outcome of in-hospital PE-related death or haemodynamic decompensation. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and the prognostic value of the derived risk score was compared to the Bova score.
Of 2067 patients with normotensive acute PE, the primary outcome (haemodynamic decompensation or PE-related death) occurred in 32 (1.5%) patients. In simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index high-risk patients (n=1498, 78%), a multivariable model used to predict the primary outcome retained computed tomography (CT) right-left ventricular diameter ratio ≥1.5, systolic blood pressure 90-100 mmHg, central pulmonary artery clot and heart rate ≥100 beats·min with a C-statistic of 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.93). Three risk groups were derived using a weighted score (score, prevalence, primary outcome event rate): group 1 (0-3, 73.8%, 0.34%), group 2 (4-6, 17.6%, 5.8%), group 3 (7-9, 8.7%, 12.8%) with a C-statistic 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91). In comparison the prevalence (primary outcome) by Bova risk stages (n=1179) were stage I 49.8% (0.2%); stage II 31.9% (2.7%); and stage III 18.4% (7.8%) with a C-statistic 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86).
A simple four-variable risk score using clinical data immediately available after CT diagnosis of acute PE predicts in-hospital adverse outcomes. External validation of the Calgary Acute Pulmonary Embolism score is required.
急性肺栓塞(PE)的预后范围广泛,但对血压正常的患者进行不良预后风险分层的最佳方法仍不明确。
对2012年至2017年期间加拿大卡尔加里急诊科收治的急性PE患者进行多中心回顾性队列研究,以制定一个改进的急性PE风险评分。复合主要结局为住院期间PE相关死亡或血流动力学失代偿。该模型通过自抽样进行内部验证,并将得出的风险评分的预后价值与博瓦评分进行比较。
在2067例血压正常的急性PE患者中,32例(1.5%)患者出现主要结局(血流动力学失代偿或PE相关死亡)。在简化肺栓塞严重程度指数高危患者(n = 1498,78%)中,用于预测主要结局的多变量模型保留了计算机断层扫描(CT)左右心室直径比≥1.5、收缩压90 - 100 mmHg、中心肺动脉血栓和心率≥100次/分钟,C统计量为0.89(95%CI 0.82 - 0.93)。使用加权评分得出三个风险组(评分、患病率、主要结局事件发生率):第1组(0 - 3分,73.8%,0.34%),第2组(4 - 6分,17.6%,5.8%),第3组(7 - 9分,8.7%,12.8%),C统计量为0.85(95%CI 0.78 - 0.91)。相比之下,博瓦风险分期(n = 1179)的患病率(主要结局)为:I期49.8%(0.2%);II期31.9%(2.7%);III期18.4%(7.8%),C统计量为0.80(95%CI 0.74 - 0.86)。
使用急性PE CT诊断后立即可得的临床数据的简单四变量风险评分可预测住院期间不良预后。需要对卡尔加里急性肺栓塞评分进行外部验证。