Suppr超能文献

基于电子决策支持的复杂干预措施改善初级医疗保健中心血管风险的管理:一项集群随机试验(INTEGRATE)。

An electronic decision support-based complex intervention to improve management of cardiovascular risk in primary health care: a cluster randomised trial (INTEGRATE).

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW.

The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2021 May;214(9):420-427. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51030. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a multifaceted primary health care intervention better controlled cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in patients with high risk of CVD than usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING: Parallel arm, cluster randomised trial in 71 Australian general practices, 5 December 2016 - 13 September 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

General practices that predominantly used an electronic medical record system compatible with the HealthTracker electronic decision support tool, and willing to implement all components of the INTEGRATE intervention.

INTERVENTION

Electronic point-of-care decision support for general practices; combination cardiovascular medications (polypills); and a pharmacy-based medication adherence program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of patients with high CVD risk not on an optimal preventive medication regimen at baseline who had achieved both blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goals at study end.

RESULTS

After a median 15 months' follow-up, primary outcome data were available for 4477 of 7165 patients in the primary outcome cohort (62%). The proportion of patients who achieved both treatment targets was similar in the intervention (423 of 2156; 19.6%) and control groups (466 of 2321; 20.1%; relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.85-1.32). Further, no statistically significant differences were found for a number of secondary outcomes, including risk factor screening, preventive medication prescribing, and risk factor levels. Use of intervention components was low; it was highest for HealthTracker, used at least once for 347 of 3236 undertreated patients with high CVD risk (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence for the efficacy of its individual components, the INTEGRATE intervention was not broadly implemented and did not improve CVD risk management in participating Australian general practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000233426 (prospective).

摘要

目的

确定多方面的初级保健干预措施是否比常规护理更能控制心血管疾病(CVD)高危患者的心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素。

设计、地点:2016 年 12 月 5 日至 2019 年 9 月 13 日,在澳大利亚 71 家普通诊所进行的平行臂、群组随机试验。

参与者

主要使用与 HealthTracker 电子决策支持工具兼容的电子病历系统的普通诊所,且愿意实施 INTEGRATE 干预的所有组成部分。

干预措施

普通诊所的电子即时决策支持;联合心血管药物(复方药);和基于药房的药物依从性计划。

主要结果测量

在基线时未接受最佳预防药物治疗的高 CVD 风险患者中,在研究结束时达到血压和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇目标的患者比例。

结果

在中位随访 15 个月后,主要结局队列的 7165 例患者中有 4477 例(62%)提供了主要结局数据。在干预组(2156 例中有 423 例;19.6%)和对照组(2321 例中有 466 例;20.1%;相对风险,1.06;95%CI,0.85-1.32)中,达到两个治疗目标的患者比例相似。此外,许多次要结局,包括危险因素筛查、预防药物处方和危险因素水平,均无统计学显著差异。干预措施的使用比例较低;HealthTracker 的使用率最高,在 3236 名治疗不足的高 CVD 风险患者中,至少有 347 名患者使用了 HealthTracker(10.7%)。

结论

尽管其各个组成部分的疗效有证据,但 INTEGRATE 干预措施并未广泛实施,也未改善参与的澳大利亚普通诊所的 CVD 风险管理。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12616000233426(前瞻性)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验