• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝癌直径和数量对切除、经动脉化疗栓塞和消融术后生存的影响。

Effect of Diameter and Number of Hepatocellular Carcinomas on Survival After Resection, Transarterial Chemoembolization, and Ablation.

机构信息

Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;116(8):1698-1708. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001256.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001256
PMID:33900211
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Most studies predicting survival after resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and ablation analyzed diameter and number of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) as dichotomous variables, resulting in an underestimation of risk variation. We aimed to develop and validate a new prognostic model for patients with HCC using largest diameter and number of HCCs as continuous variables.

METHODS

The prognostic model was developed using data from patients undergoing resection, TACE, and ablation in 645 Japanese institutions. The model results were shown after balanced using the inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis and were externally validated in an international multi-institution cohort.

RESULTS

Of 77,268 patients, 43,904 patients, including 15,313 (34.9%) undergoing liver resection, 13,375 (30.5%) undergoing TACE, and 15,216 (34.7%) undergoing ablation, met the inclusion criteria. Our model (http://www.u-tokyo-hbp-transplant-surgery.jp/about/calculation.html) showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC undergoing these procedures decreased with progressive incremental increases in diameter and number of HCCs. For patients undergoing resection, the inverse probability of treatment-weighted-adjusted 5-year OS probabilities were 10%-20% higher compared with patients undergoing TACE for 1-6 HCC lesions <10 cm and were also 10%-20% higher compared with patients undergoing ablation when the HCC diameter was 2-3 cm. For patients undergoing resection and TACE, the model performed well in the external cohort.

DISCUSSION

Our novel prognostic model performed well in predicting OS after resection and TACE for HCC and demonstrated that resection may have a survival benefit over TACE and ablation based on the diameter and number of HCCs.

摘要

简介

大多数预测肝癌切除术、经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)和消融术后生存的研究均将肝癌(HCC)的直径和数量分析为二分类变量,从而低估了风险变化。我们旨在使用最大直径和 HCC 数量作为连续变量为 HCC 患者开发和验证新的预后模型。

方法

该预后模型使用来自 645 家日本机构接受切除术、TACE 和消融术的患者的数据进行开发。在使用逆概率治疗加权分析进行平衡后显示模型结果,并在国际多机构队列中进行外部验证。

结果

在 77268 例患者中,有 43904 例患者符合纳入标准,包括 15313 例(34.9%)接受肝切除术、13375 例(30.5%)接受 TACE 术和 15216 例(34.7%)接受消融术。我们的模型(http://www.u-tokyo-hbp-transplant-surgery.jp/about/calculation.html)显示,接受这些治疗的 HCC 患者的 5 年总生存率(OS)随 HCC 直径和数量的逐渐增加而降低。对于接受切除术的患者,与接受 TACE 治疗 1-6 个<10cm 的 HCC 病变的患者相比,经治疗加权调整的 5 年 OS 概率提高了 10%-20%,与直径为 2-3cm 的 HCC 患者相比,也提高了 10%-20%。对于接受切除术和 TACE 的患者,该模型在外部队列中表现良好。

讨论

我们的新型预后模型在预测 HCC 切除术和 TACE 后的 OS 方面表现良好,并表明基于 HCC 的直径和数量,切除术可能比 TACE 和消融术具有生存优势。

相似文献

1
Effect of Diameter and Number of Hepatocellular Carcinomas on Survival After Resection, Transarterial Chemoembolization, and Ablation.肝癌直径和数量对切除、经动脉化疗栓塞和消融术后生存的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;116(8):1698-1708. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001256.
2
Role of surgical resection for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas.外科切除术治疗多个肝细胞癌的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 21;19(3):366-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.366.
3
Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.对比中期肝细胞癌手术切除与肝动脉化疗栓塞联合或不联合射频消融的总生存率:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 10;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01235-w.
4
Classification of hepatocellular carcinoma diameter by statistical technology and prognostic evaluation in patients after the combined use of transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation.经动脉化疗栓塞术与射频消融术联合应用后患者肝细胞癌直径的统计学技术分类及预后评估
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(2):356-364. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_648_19.
5
Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas.经动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞治疗大的单发或多结节性肝细胞癌的疗效和预后因素比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;19(2):237-246. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.237. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
Combination transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy for early hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗早期肝细胞癌。
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(2):242-52. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.112. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.肝切除术与经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗孤立性肝细胞癌的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4635-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4635.
8
Chemoembolization of recurrent hepatoma after curative resection: prognostic factors.根治性切除术后复发性肝癌的化疗栓塞:预后因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):1322-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13343.
9
Comparison of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy Surgical Resection for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞联合射频消融治疗与手术切除治疗早期肝细胞癌的比较
Am Surg. 2018 Feb 1;84(2):282-288.
10
Is Salvage Liver Resection Necessary for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Downstaged by Transarterial Chemoembolization? Ten Years of Experience.对于经动脉化疗栓塞后降期的初始不可切除肝细胞癌患者,挽救性肝切除是否必要?十年经验。
Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1442-1449. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0094. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of hepatic resection for HCC in ideal and non-ideal candidates.理想和非理想候选者中肝癌肝切除的结果。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Jul 29;9(8). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000772. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
2
Minimally invasive hepatectomy thermoablation for single small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: A weighted real-life national comparison.单发性小(≤3 cm)肝细胞癌的微创肝切除术与热消融术:一项基于全国实际情况的加权比较。
JHEP Rep. 2025 Apr 25;7(8):101420. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101420. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Discrepancy Between Conventional Coagulation Tests and Thromboelastography During the Early Postoperative Phase of Liver Resection in Neoplastic Patients: A Prospective Study Using the New-Generation TEG6s.
肿瘤患者肝切除术后早期传统凝血试验与血栓弹力图的差异:一项使用新一代TEG6s的前瞻性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2866. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092866.
4
Comparison of carbon ion radiotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma >3 cm: a propensity score-matched analysis.碳离子放疗与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗直径>3cm不可切除的孤立性肝细胞癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Radiat Res. 2025 May 23;66(3):306-317. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf026.
5
Donafenib versus sorafenib in triple therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched multicenter analysis.多纳非尼与索拉非尼用于不可切除肝细胞癌三联疗法的倾向评分匹配多中心分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 12;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03767-5.
6
Development of Cytolytic Iridium-Complexed Octaarginine Peptide Albumin Nanomedicine for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment.用于治疗肝细胞癌的细胞溶解性铱络合八聚精氨酸肽白蛋白纳米药物的研发
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Feb 25;20:2395-2409. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S502257. eCollection 2025.
7
Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.晚期肝细胞癌新的可切除性肿瘤学标准的临床应用
Liver Cancer. 2024 May 16;13(6):601-609. doi: 10.1159/000539381. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Oncological Resectability Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies: The Japan Liver Cancer Association and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement 2023.新型全身治疗时代肝细胞癌的肿瘤可切除性标准:日本肝癌协会和日本肝胆胰外科学会2023年专家共识声明
Liver Cancer. 2024 Mar 29;13(6):0-10. doi: 10.1159/000538627. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
A Machine Learning Model Based on Counterfactual Theory for Treatment Decision of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.一种基于反事实理论的肝细胞癌患者治疗决策机器学习模型。
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Aug 30;11:1675-1687. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S470550. eCollection 2024.
10
Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Elderly Patients with Cirrhotic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Ablation Therapy.基于机器学习的列线图预测接受消融治疗的老年肝硬化肝细胞癌患者的总生存期
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Mar 7;11:509-523. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S450825. eCollection 2024.