• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地缘政治风险是否会加剧 CO 排放?来自金砖国家的证据。

Does geopolitical risk escalate CO emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries.

机构信息

School of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.

National Tariff Commission, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(35):48011-48021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14032-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-14032-z
PMID:33900560
Abstract

High levels of CO emissions are extensively cited as one of the main global concerns nowadays. Therefore, researchers have been investigating the factors that affect CO emissions. In the prior literature, several social, economic, and political drivers of CO emissions have been investigated; however, there is a dearth of the literature on the impact of geopolitical risks (GPR) on CO emissions. Hence, the objective of this study is to explore the impact of GPR on CO emissions in the case of the BRICS countries while controlling the effects of population, GDP, non-renewable energy, and renewable energy consumption. The study uses the recently developed GPR index, proposed by Caldara and Iacoviello (2018), and the AMG (augmented mean group) estimator method. The findings document that GPR escalates CO emissions. That is, a 1% increase in GPR escalates CO emissions by 13%. Moreover, it also reports that renewable energy consumption impedes CO emissions. In contrast, GDP, population, and non-renewable energy consumption surge CO emissions. The study also proposes a few policy implications based on the findings: (1) policymakers and government officials should try to limit GPR through peace treaties, agreements, and negotiations; (2) share of renewable energy in total energy consumption should be increased in order to plunge CO emissions.

摘要

高水平的二氧化碳排放被广泛认为是当今全球主要关注的问题之一。因此,研究人员一直在研究影响二氧化碳排放的因素。在先前的文献中,已经研究了二氧化碳排放的几个社会、经济和政治驱动因素;然而,关于地缘政治风险(GPR)对二氧化碳排放影响的文献却很少。因此,本研究的目的是在控制人口、国内生产总值、不可再生能源和可再生能源消费的影响的情况下,探讨 GPR 对金砖国家二氧化碳排放的影响。本研究使用了最近由 Caldara 和 Iacoviello(2018)提出的 GPR 指数和 AMG(扩充均值组)估计器方法。研究结果表明,GPR 会加剧二氧化碳排放。也就是说,GPR 每增加 1%,二氧化碳排放量就会增加 13%。此外,研究还报告称,可再生能源消费会抑制二氧化碳排放。相比之下,国内生产总值、人口和非可再生能源消费会增加二氧化碳排放。本研究还根据研究结果提出了一些政策建议:(1)政策制定者和政府官员应通过和平条约、协议和谈判来尽力限制 GPR;(2)应增加可再生能源在总能源消费中的份额,以降低二氧化碳排放。

相似文献

1
Does geopolitical risk escalate CO emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries.地缘政治风险是否会加剧 CO 排放?来自金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(35):48011-48021. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14032-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries.地缘政治风险和能源消耗是否会导致环境恶化?来自 E7 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):41640-41652. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
3
Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach.经济政策不确定性和地缘政治风险是否会导致二氧化碳排放增加?面板分位数回归方法的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):27845-27861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17707-9. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Do renewable energy consumption and service industry development contribute to CO emissions reduction in BRICS countries?可再生能源消费和服务业发展对金砖国家的 CO 排放减少有贡献吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31632-31643. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06330-4. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
BRICS carbon neutrality target: Measuring the impact of electricity production from renewable energy sources and globalization.金砖国家碳中和目标:衡量可再生能源发电和全球化的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113460. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113460. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
The impact of geopolitical risk, governance, technological innovations, energy use, and foreign direct investment on CO emissions in the BRICS region.金砖国家地区地缘政治风险、治理、技术创新、能源利用和外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):73714-73729. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27466-4. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach.在地缘政治风险背景下研究环境库兹涅茨曲线假说:运用自抽样自回归分布滞后方法的全球证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):24049-24062. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17488-1. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
8
Do drivers of renewable energy consumption matter for BRICS economies? Nexus among technological innovation, environmental degradation, economic growth, and income inequality.可再生能源消费的驱动因素对金砖国家经济体重要吗?技术创新、环境恶化、经济增长和收入不平等之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):11321-11331. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24665-3. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
9
Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model.能源效率和可再生能源对金砖国家经济碳排放的非对称影响:来自非线性面板自回归分布滞后模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(15):18254-18268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08353-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Impact of economic policy uncertainty on CO emissions: evidence from top ten carbon emitter countries.经济政策不确定性对 CO 排放的影响:来自十大碳排放国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29369-29378. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12782-4. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting the determinants of CO2 emissions: The role of higher education under the extended STIRPAT model.重新审视二氧化碳排放的决定因素:扩展的STIRPAT模型下高等教育的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319930. eCollection 2025.
2
Does digital inclusive finance promote carbon emission reduction of enterprises.数字包容性金融是否促进企业碳减排。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0302826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302826. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency.
地缘政治风险对环境可持续性的影响以及环境政策严格性的调节作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 10;14(1):10747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60773-5.
4
Does the causality between environmental sustainability, non-renewable energy consumption, geopolitical risks, and trade liberalization matter for Pakistan? Evidence from VECM analysis.环境可持续性、不可再生能源消费、地缘政治风险和贸易自由化之间的因果关系对巴基斯坦重要吗?来自向量误差修正模型分析的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 23;9(11):e21444. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21444. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
The potency of natural resources and trade globalisation in the ecological sustainability target for the BRICS economies.自然资源和贸易全球化对金砖国家经济体生态可持续发展目标的影响力。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 25;9(5):e15734. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15734. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Sustainable development goals perspective: nexus between Christians' religious tourism, geopolitical risk, and CO pollution in Italy.可持续发展目标视角:意大利基督徒宗教旅游、地缘政治风险与 CO 污染的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):62341-62354. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26463-x. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Does political stability contribute to environmental sustainability? Evidence from the most politically stable economies.政治稳定是否有助于环境可持续性?来自政治最稳定经济体的证据。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 20;8(12):e12479. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12479. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
The effects of nurturing pressure and unemployment on carbon emissions: cross-country evidence.养育压力和失业对碳排放的影响:跨国证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):52013-52032. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19515-1. Epub 2022 Mar 7.