Lepski Guilherme, Reis Bruno, de Oliveira Adilson, Neville Iuri
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, LIM26, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Neurosurgery, University Eberhard Karls, Tübingen, Germany.
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, LIM26, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Apr 1;205:106599. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106599.
Several factors are commonly associated with the occurrence of post-operative infection after craniotomy. However, the risk factors associated with tumor surgery have been less intensively investigated. The aim of the present study was to analyze the risk factors for infection and categorize patients according to risk rate.
In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 987 adult patients consecutively submitted to craniotomy for tumor resection. The primary outcome was the occurrence of infection within 30 days after surgery. The following independent variables were assessed: age, gender, surgery duration, length of hospital stay prior to surgery, reoperation, body mass index, serum albumin, hemoglobin, lactic dehydrogenase, smoking, diabetes, corticoid use, preoperative chemotherapy, previous irradiation, elective or urgent indication for surgery, supra or infratentorial lesion location, and tumor histology. We performed a recursive partitioning analysis to assess the relative importance of these variables in predicting infection.
The model returned a 3-level classification: 1. CSF-leakage (relative contribution 70%), 2. Emergency surgery indication (18%), and 3. Tumor histology (8%). Additionally, partitioning clustered together 3 risk groups: 1. CSF-leakage group (probability of infection 72.5%), 2. No CSF-leakage and urgent surgery (mean probability 18.1%); and 3. no CSF-leakage and no urgent surgery (3.4%). The misclassification rate was 4.5%, the overall specificity and sensitivity were 99.6% and 75.5%, respectively, and the area under the ROC-curve was 0.6908.
Our analysis indicates that technical and treatment-related factors are significantly more relevant than patient- or disease-related factors in determining the risk of postoperative infection.
开颅术后感染的发生通常与多种因素相关。然而,与肿瘤手术相关的危险因素尚未得到深入研究。本研究旨在分析感染的危险因素,并根据风险率对患者进行分类。
在本研究中,我们回顾性评估了987例连续接受开颅肿瘤切除术的成年患者。主要结局是术后30天内发生感染。评估了以下独立变量:年龄、性别、手术时长、术前住院时间、再次手术、体重指数、血清白蛋白、血红蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、吸烟、糖尿病、皮质类固醇使用、术前化疗、既往放疗、手术的择期或急诊指征、幕上或幕下病变位置以及肿瘤组织学。我们进行了递归划分分析,以评估这些变量在预测感染中的相对重要性。
该模型得出了一个三级分类:1. 脑脊液漏(相对贡献70%),2. 急诊手术指征(18%),3. 肿瘤组织学(8%)。此外,划分将患者聚为3个风险组:1. 脑脊液漏组(感染概率72.5%),2. 无脑脊液漏且为急诊手术(平均概率18.1%);3. 无脑脊液漏且非急诊手术(3.4%)。误分类率为4.5%,总体特异性和敏感性分别为99.6%和75.5%,ROC曲线下面积为0.6908。
我们的分析表明,在确定术后感染风险方面技术和治疗相关因素比患者或疾病相关因素显著更重要。