• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立并验证用于预测 1-2 枚前哨淋巴结宏转移的乳腺癌患者腋窝非前哨淋巴结转移的列线图:两项独立队列的回顾性分析。

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting axillary non-SLN metastases in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node macro-metastases: a retrospective analysis of two independent cohorts.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Ruzhou First People's Hospital, Ruzhou, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08178-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08178-9
PMID:33902502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077841/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is reported that appropriately 50% of early breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) micro-metastases could not benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation. However, whether patients with 1-2 positive SLN macro-metastases could benefit from ALND remains unknown. The aim of our study was to develop and validate nomograms for assessing axillary non-SLN metastases in patients with 1-2 positive SLN macro-metastases, using their pathological features alone or in combination with STMs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed pathological features and STMs of 1150 early breast cancer patients from two independent cohorts. Best subset regression was used for feature selection and signature building. The risk score of axillary non-SLN metastases was calculated for each patient as a linear combination of selected predictors that were weighted by their respective coefficients.

RESULTS

The pathology-based nomogram possessed a strong discrimination ability for axillary non-SLN metastases, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.727 (95% CI: 0.682-0.771) in the primary cohort and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.653-0.792) in the validation cohort. The addition of CA 15-3 and CEA can significantly improve the performance of pathology-based nomogram in the primary cohort (AUC: 0.773 (0.732-0.815) vs. 0.727 (0.682-0.771), P < 0.001) and validation cohort (AUC: (0.777 (0.713-0.840) vs. 0.722 (0.653-0.792), P < 0.001). Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomograms were clinically useful.

CONCLUSION

The nomograms based on pathological features can be used to identify axillary non-SLN metastases in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive SLN. In addition, the combination of STMs and pathological features can identify patients with patients with axillary non-SLN metastases more accurately than pathological characteristics alone.

摘要

背景

据报道,约有 50%的 1-2 个前哨淋巴结(SLN)微转移的早期乳腺癌患者不能从腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)或保乳手术联合全乳放疗中获益。然而,1-2 个 SLN 宏转移的患者是否能从 ALND 中获益尚不清楚。我们的研究旨在开发和验证仅基于其病理特征或联合 STMs 评估 1-2 个 SLN 宏转移的患者腋窝非 SLN 转移的列线图。

方法

我们回顾性分析了来自两个独立队列的 1150 例早期乳腺癌患者的病理特征和 STMs。采用最佳子集回归进行特征选择和特征构建。为每个患者计算腋窝非 SLN 转移的风险评分,作为所选预测因子的线性组合,这些预测因子由各自的系数加权。

结果

基于病理学的列线图具有很强的腋窝非 SLN 转移区分能力,在主要队列中的接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.727(95%CI:0.682-0.771),在验证队列中的 AUC 为 0.722(95%CI:0.653-0.792)。在主要队列中,加入 CA 15-3 和 CEA 可显著提高基于病理学的列线图的性能(AUC:0.773(0.732-0.815)与 0.727(0.682-0.771),P<0.001)和验证队列(AUC:0.777(0.713-0.840)与 0.722(0.653-0.792),P<0.001)。决策曲线分析表明,该列线图具有临床实用性。

结论

基于病理特征的列线图可用于识别 1-2 个 SLN 阳性的乳腺癌患者的腋窝非 SLN 转移。此外,与仅基于病理特征相比,联合 STMs 和病理特征可更准确地识别有腋窝非 SLN 转移的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/561247e98c5e/12885_2021_8178_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/9de0c6c8d9c0/12885_2021_8178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/85fd931b6424/12885_2021_8178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/41234823b73c/12885_2021_8178_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/5990b633e2e8/12885_2021_8178_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/561247e98c5e/12885_2021_8178_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/9de0c6c8d9c0/12885_2021_8178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/85fd931b6424/12885_2021_8178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/41234823b73c/12885_2021_8178_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/5990b633e2e8/12885_2021_8178_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c692/8077841/561247e98c5e/12885_2021_8178_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting axillary non-SLN metastases in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph node macro-metastases: a retrospective analysis of two independent cohorts.建立并验证用于预测 1-2 枚前哨淋巴结宏转移的乳腺癌患者腋窝非前哨淋巴结转移的列线图:两项独立队列的回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08178-9.
2
A multi-dimensional nomogram to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1-2HR+ breast cancer.用于预测 T1-2HR+ 乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的多维列线图。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;14:1121394. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1121394. eCollection 2023.
3
Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1-2 sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy.新辅助治疗后行乳房切除术的 T1-2 前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中非前哨淋巴结转移的预测。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 28;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03537-9.
4
A Novel Predictive Nomogram including Serum Lipoprotein a Level for Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastases in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases.一种包含血清脂蛋白(a)水平的新型预测列线图,用于预测中国乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移阳性患者的非前哨淋巴结转移。
Dis Markers. 2021 Nov 22;2021:7879508. doi: 10.1155/2021/7879508. eCollection 2021.
5
A Dutch Prediction Tool to Assess the Risk of Additional Axillary Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.一种用于评估前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝非前哨淋巴结转移风险的荷兰预测工具。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Apr;16(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Can a machine-learning model improve the prediction of nodal stage after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer?机器学习模型能否提高乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检阳性后的淋巴结分期预测?
Acta Oncol. 2020 Jun;59(6):689-695. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1736332. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
7
Nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy.用于预测前哨淋巴结活检阳性的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移可能性的列线图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(52):e18522. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018522.
8
Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel node metastases after minimal sentinel node involvement: validation of the Helsinki breast nomogram.验证一个用于预测最小前哨淋巴结受累后非前哨淋巴结转移的乳腺癌列线图:赫尔辛基乳腺癌列线图的验证。
Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):787-92. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
9
Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict four or more positive nodes in breast cancer patients with one to three positive sentinel lymph nodes.建立并外部验证一个列线图模型,以预测 1-3 枚前哨淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者中存在 4 枚及以上阳性淋巴结的情况。
Breast. 2020 Oct;53:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
10
Validation of online calculators to predict the non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients.验证在线计算器预测前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结状态的准确性。
Surg Today. 2013 Feb;43(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0229-2. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytoplasmic and nuclear programmed death ligand 1 expression in peritumoral stromal cells in breast cancer: Prognostic and predictive value.乳腺癌瘤周基质细胞中细胞质和细胞核程序性死亡配体1的表达:预后和预测价值。
World J Exp Med. 2025 Jun 20;15(2):102761. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102761.
2
Non-sentinel lymph node metastases risk factors in patients with breast cancer with one or two sentinel lymph node macro-metastases.有一或两个前哨淋巴结大转移的乳腺癌患者非前哨淋巴结转移的危险因素
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 24;9(11):e21254. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21254. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
A multi-dimensional nomogram to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1-2HR+ breast cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Values Of Preoperative Serum CEA And CA125 Levels And Nomograms For Young Breast Cancer Patients.年轻乳腺癌患者术前血清CEA和CA125水平的预后价值及列线图
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Oct 24;12:8789-8800. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S221335. eCollection 2019.
2
The prognostic significance of preoperative tumor marker (CEA, CA15-3) elevation in breast cancer patients: data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry.术前肿瘤标志物(CEA、CA15-3)升高对乳腺癌患者预后的意义:来自韩国乳腺癌学会注册中心的数据。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;177(3):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05357-y. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
3
用于预测 T1-2HR+ 乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的多维列线图。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;14:1121394. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1121394. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting axillary non-SLN metastases in breast cancer patients: A retrospective analysis.预测乳腺癌患者腋窝非前哨淋巴结转移列线图的开发与验证:一项回顾性分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;13:1096589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1096589. eCollection 2023.
5
Non-sentinel node metastasis prediction during surgery in breast cancer patients with one to three positive sentinel node(s) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后 1-3 枚前哨淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者术中非前哨淋巴结转移预测。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 18;13(1):4480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31628-2.
6
A novel nomogram for decision-making assistance on exemption of axillary lymph node dissection in T1-2 breast cancer with only one sentinel lymph node metastasis.一种用于辅助决策T1-2期仅伴有一枚前哨淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者免除腋窝淋巴结清扫的新型列线图。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 12;12:924298. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.924298. eCollection 2022.
Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.
报告和解读决策曲线分析:研究人员指南。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):796-804. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state.乳腺癌统计数据,2017 年,按州划分的死亡率种族差异。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):439-448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
The diagnostic value of serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA15-3, and TPS in metastatic breast cancer.血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)及组织多肽特异性抗原(TPS)在转移性乳腺癌中的诊断价值
Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Jul;470:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.早期乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):561-564. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0947. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
7
Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population.影响前哨淋巴结阳性患者非前哨淋巴结受累的因素及MSKCC列线图在印度乳腺癌人群中的验证
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;6(4):337-45. doi: 10.1007/s13193-015-0431-y. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
8
Comparison of five different popular scoring systems to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a tertiary care center experience.五种不同常用评分系统预测转移性前哨淋巴结患者非前哨淋巴结状态的比较:一家三级医疗中心的经验
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 29;4:651. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1442-4. eCollection 2015.
9
Validation of Six Nomograms for Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastases in a Dutch Breast Cancer Population.六种预测荷兰乳腺癌人群非前哨淋巴结转移列线图的验证
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):477-81. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4858-8. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.预测中国乳腺癌患者中1-2枚前哨淋巴结阳性时非前哨淋巴结转移情况:一种新预测列线图的构建与评估
World J Surg. 2015 Dec;39(12):2919-27. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3189-z.