Liaghat Behnam, Pedersen Julie Rønne, Young James J, Thorlund Jonas Bloch, Juul-Kristensen Birgit, Juhl Carsten Bogh
Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04249-x.
Joint hypermobility in athletes is associated with increased risk of knee injuries, but its role in relation to shoulder injuries has not been scrutinized. Therefore, our aim was to synthesize the evidence on the association between joint hypermobility and shoulder injuries in athletes.
Data sources were MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus from inception to 27th February 2021. Eligibility criteria were observational studies of athletes (including military personnel), mean age ≥ 16 years, and with a transparent grouping of those with and without joint hypermobility. A broad definition of joint hypermobility as the exposure was accepted (i.e., generalised joint hypermobility (GJH), shoulder joint hypermobility including joint instability). Shoulder injuries included acute and overuse injuries, and self-reported pain was accepted as a proxy for shoulder injuries. The Odds Ratios (OR) for having shoulder injuries in exposed compared with non-exposed athletes were estimated using a random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the effect of sex, activity type, sports level, study type, risk of bias, and exposure definition. Risk of bias and the overall quality of evidence were assessed using, respectively, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Among 6207 records, six studies were included with 2335 (range 118-718) participants (34.1% females; athlete mean age 19.9 years). Athletes with joint hypermobility were more likely to have shoulder injuries compared with athletes without joint hypermobility (OR = 3.25, 95% CI 1.64, 6.43, I = 75.3%; p = 0.001). Exposure definition (GJH, OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.32, 2.94; shoulder joint hypermobility, OR = 8.23, 95% CI 3.63, 18.66; p = 0.002) and risk of bias (low, OR = 5.25, 95% CI 2.56, 10.8; high, OR = 1.6, 95% CI 0.78, 3.29; p = 0.024) had large impacts on estimates, while the remaining subgroup analyses showed no differences. The overall quality of evidence was low.
Joint hypermobility in athletes is associated with a threefold higher odds of having shoulder injuries, highlighting the need for prevention strategies in this population. However, due to low quality of evidence, future research will likely change the estimated strength of the association.
Open Science Framework registration osf.io/3wrn9.
运动员的关节活动过度与膝关节损伤风险增加有关,但其与肩部损伤的关系尚未得到详细研究。因此,我们的目的是综合关于运动员关节活动过度与肩部损伤之间关联的证据。
数据来源为MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE和SPORTDiscus,检索时间从数据库建立至2021年2月27日。纳入标准为针对运动员(包括军事人员)的观察性研究,平均年龄≥16岁,且对有关节活动过度和无关节活动过度的人群进行了明确分组。接受将关节活动过度作为广泛暴露因素的定义(即全身关节活动过度(GJH)、包括关节不稳定的肩关节活动过度)。肩部损伤包括急性损伤和过度使用损伤,自我报告的疼痛被视为肩部损伤的替代指标。采用随机效应荟萃分析估计暴露组与非暴露组运动员发生肩部损伤的比值比(OR)。进行亚组分析以探讨性别、活动类型、运动水平、研究类型、偏倚风险和暴露定义的影响。分别使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)来评估偏倚风险和证据的整体质量。
在6207条记录中,纳入了6项研究,共2335名参与者(范围118 - 718)(34.1%为女性;运动员平均年龄19.9岁)。与无关节活动过度的运动员相比,有关节活动过度的运动员更易发生肩部损伤(OR = 3.25,95% CI 1.64,6.43,I² = 75.3%;p = 0.001)。暴露定义(GJH,OR = 1.97,95% CI 1.32,2.94;肩关节活动过度,OR = 8.23,95% CI 3.63,18.66;p = 0.002)和偏倚风险(低,OR = 5.25,95% CI 2.56,10.8;高,OR = 1.6,95% CI 0.78,3.29;p = 0.024)对估计值有较大影响,而其余亚组分析未显示差异。证据的整体质量较低。
运动员的关节活动过度与肩部损伤的发生几率高出三倍有关,这凸显了该人群预防策略的必要性。然而,由于证据质量较低,未来的研究可能会改变估计的关联强度。
开放科学框架注册osf.io/3wrn9 。