• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎植入手术满意度评估。

Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment.

机构信息

Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Department of Urology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2021 May;18(5):868-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.007
PMID:33903044
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported high satisfaction rates (> 90%) for patients and their partners after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation.

AIM

To describe and critically discuss the current evidence regarding the assessment of patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

METHODS

A critical narrative review of the studies investigating the patient and partner satisfaction after PP implantation was designed. Papers in English-language published until January 2021 were included.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome investigated was patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

RESULTS

The International Index of Erectile Function , the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction , the Treatment Satisfaction Scale , and the Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis are the best-known validated tools used to assess satisfaction after PP implantation. Except for Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis , they were not validated in patients undergoing penile implant surgery. The lack of an "ad hoc" tool has led to the widespread of nonvalidated questionnaires. Several tools can be useful in the preimplantation counseling, such as the mnemonic Compulsive/obsessive, Unrealistic, Revision, Surgeon Shopping, Entitled, Denial, and Psychiatric , the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Men , the Attitude towards Penile Implant , and the Attitude Attributed to the Partner towards Penile Implant .

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Improvement of knowledge regarding the available tools to evaluate the satisfaction after penile implant surgery.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Comprehensive and thorough review of all the main validated questionnaires available to assess satisfaction in patients with PP. Lack of a systematic approach and quantitative data analysis.

CONCLUSION

Despite the high satisfaction rate reported in the literature, most of the studies used suboptimal or non-validated questionnaires to assess patients undergoing penile implant surgery. Future research is needed to develop and validate a specific, complete and easy-to-use questionnaire. Manfredi C, Fortier É, Faix A, et al. Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment. J Sex Med 2021;18:868-874.

摘要

背景

多项研究报告称,患者及其伴侣对阴茎假体(PP)植入后的满意度很高(>90%)。

目的

描述并批判性地讨论当前关于阴茎植入手术后患者和伴侣满意度评估的证据。

方法

设计了一项关于 PP 植入后患者和伴侣满意度研究的批判性叙述性综述。纳入截至 2021 年 1 月发表的英文文献。

结果

主要研究结果是阴茎植入手术后患者和伴侣的满意度。

结论

国际勃起功能指数、治疗满意度问卷、治疗满意度量表以及阴茎假体的生活质量和性生活是评估 PP 植入后满意度的最知名的经过验证的工具。除了阴茎假体的生活质量和性生活外,它们在接受阴茎植入手术的患者中均未得到验证。缺乏专用工具导致广泛使用未经验证的问卷。在植入前咨询中,有几个工具可能会很有用,例如记忆术 Compulsive/obsessive、Unrealistic、Revision、Surgeon Shopping、Entitled、Denial 和 Psychiatric、明尼苏达多项人格测验、男性简短性症状清单、对阴茎植入的态度以及归因于伴侣的对阴茎植入的态度。

临床意义

提高对评估阴茎植入手术后满意度的可用工具的了解。

优势和局限性

全面彻底地审查了所有可用于评估 PP 患者满意度的主要经过验证的问卷。缺乏系统的方法和定量数据分析。

尽管文献报道的满意度很高,但大多数研究使用次优或未经验证的问卷来评估接受阴茎植入手术的患者。需要进一步研究来开发和验证一种特定的、完整的和易于使用的问卷。

相似文献

1
Penile Implant Surgery Satisfaction Assessment.阴茎植入手术满意度评估。
J Sex Med. 2021 May;18(5):868-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.缺乏有效的英文语言调查评估假体满意度:使用阴茎假体后生活质量的前瞻性队列研究。
J Sex Med. 2020 Nov;17(11):2307-2310. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
Quality of Life, Psychological Functioning, and Treatment Satisfaction of Men Who Have Undergone Penile Prosthesis Surgery Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后接受阴茎假体手术的男性的生活质量、心理功能和治疗满意度。
J Sex Med. 2017 Dec;14(12):1612-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
4
Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.比较不同类型和品牌阴茎植入物的长期效果和患者夫妇满意度:883 例勃起功能障碍患者阴茎假体植入术后的经验教训。
J Sex Med. 2019 Jul;16(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Sexual Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Penile Prostheses.性健康状况和对阴茎假体的满意度。
Sex Med Rev. 2019 Jan;7(1):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Critical Analysis of Satisfaction Assessment After Penile Prosthesis Surgery.阴茎假体手术后满意度评估的批判性分析。
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Apr;5(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
7
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
Clinical Recommendations From the European Society for Sexual Medicine Exploring Partner Expectations, Satisfaction in Male and Phalloplasty Cohorts, the Impact of Penile Length, Girth and Implant Type, Reservoir Placement, and the Influence of Comorbidities and Social Circumstances.欧洲性医学学会的临床建议,探索男性和阴茎成形术队列中的伴侣期望、满意度、阴茎长度、周长和植入物类型的影响、储液器位置,以及合并症和社会环境的影响。
J Sex Med. 2020 Feb;17(2):210-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.016. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
9
A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?阴茎假体植入术后生活质量评估问卷:阴茎假体的生活质量和性生活(QoLSPP):植入物在多大程度上影响了患者的生活?
J Sex Med. 2014 Apr;11(4):1005-1012. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12453. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
A Single-Surgeon Retrospective and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis.单外科医生回顾性研究和初步评估 Penuma 硅胶套植入术治疗疲软阴茎的安全性和有效性。
J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1216-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes of Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Psychogenic and Organic Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Study.心理性和器质性勃起功能障碍患者阴茎假体植入的患者满意度及结果:一项比较研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 16;14(14):5032. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145032.
2
A Narrative Review of Independent Treatment Methods for ED: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Diet, Supplements, Pharmacotherapy, and Physiotherapy.勃起功能障碍独立治疗方法的叙述性综述:饮食、补充剂、药物治疗和物理治疗的有效性评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 31;14(7):2386. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072386.
3
Patient out-of-pocket costs for guideline-recommended treatments for erectile dysfunction: a medicare cost modeling analysis.
勃起功能障碍指南推荐治疗的患者自付费用:一项医疗保险成本建模分析。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):45-50. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00903-9. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.目前阴茎植入手术中的设备、结果和疼痛管理注意事项:文献的最新综述。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):335-343. doi: 10.4103/aja202386. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.以优化阴茎假体植入患者满意度为重点评估精神风险——一项叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Nov 30;12(11):1761-1771. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-144. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
History of penile implants: from implants made of bone to modern inflatable penile implants.阴茎植入物的历史:从骨制植入物到现代可充气阴茎植入物。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):601-608. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00695-4. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
Quantifying the number of US men with erectile dysfunction who are potential candidates for penile prosthesis implantation.量化美国患有勃起功能障碍且有可能成为阴茎假体植入术候选者的男性人数。
Sex Med. 2023 Apr 17;11(2):qfad010. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad010. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Voice Assistants as Consultants for Male Patients with Sexual Dysfunction: A Reliable Option?语音助手作为男性性功能障碍患者的顾问:可靠的选择吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032612.
9
Investigating self-reported efficacy of lifestyle medicine approaches to tackle erectile dysfunction: a cross-sectional eSurvey based study.调查生活方式医学方法治疗勃起功能障碍的自我报告疗效:基于横断面电子调查的研究。
BMC Urol. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01180-2.
10
New findings regarding the influence of assistants on surgical outcomes in penile prosthesis implantation.关于助手对阴茎假体植入手术结果影响的新发现。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Dec;35(8):736-740. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00624-x. Epub 2022 Oct 8.