Rickles Nathaniel M, Wakai Sara, Karim-Nejad Ladan
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jul-Aug;61(4):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
To (1) identify the reasons for which pharmacists in Connecticut use the CPMRS when dispensing opioid medications and medical marijuana products, (2) determine pharmacists' perceived value of the CPMRS when dispensing opioids or medical marijuana, and (3) compare practices and the perceived value of the CPMRS among community-based pharmacists (CBPs) and medical marijuana dispensary pharmacists (MMDPs).
An online survey was administered from May 2019 to June 2019 to CBPs (n = 178) and MMDPs (n = 12). The survey included items about background, use, and attitudes about current and future use of the CPMRS.
Both pharmacist groups indicated that opioid use information was the most useful aspect of the CPMRS. Ninety percent of both groups checked patients' use of opioids using the CPMRS, and 81.2% of the MMDPs compared with 38.4% of the CBPs indicated that they checked for patients' use of medical marijuana. A greater percentage of MMDPs than CBPs felt that access to the marijuana use information was useful and needed for counseling. Several pharmacists recommended improvements in marijuana use information in the CPMRS and greater efficiencies for users of the system.
Access to both marijuana and opioid use information can allow pharmacists to make specific recommendations on the basis of potential drug interactions and dose adjustments. The results from the present study highlight how integrated systems of opioid and marijuana dispensing information can be further enhanced by resolving existing pharmacy barriers involving technology, workflow, and need for systems with more detailed marijuana product information.
(1)确定康涅狄格州药剂师在分发阿片类药物和医用大麻产品时使用康涅狄格州处方监控计划(CPMRS)的原因;(2)确定药剂师在分发阿片类药物或医用大麻时对CPMRS的感知价值;(3)比较社区药剂师(CBP)和医用大麻药房药剂师(MMDP)在使用CPMRS方面的做法及其感知价值。
2019年5月至2019年6月对社区药剂师(n = 178)和医用大麻药房药剂师(n = 12)进行了在线调查。该调查包括有关背景、CPMRS的使用情况以及对其当前和未来使用的态度等项目。
两个药剂师群体均表示,阿片类药物使用信息是CPMRS最有用的方面。两组中90%的人使用CPMRS检查患者的阿片类药物使用情况,81.2%的医用大麻药房药剂师(相比之下社区药剂师为38.4%)表示他们检查了患者的医用大麻使用情况。感觉获取大麻使用信息对咨询有用且有必要的医用大麻药房药剂师的比例高于社区药剂师。几位药剂师建议改进CPMRS中的大麻使用信息,并提高该系统用户的工作效率。
获取大麻和阿片类药物使用信息可使药剂师根据潜在的药物相互作用和剂量调整提出具体建议。本研究结果凸显了通过消除涉及技术、工作流程以及对具有更详细大麻产品信息系统的需求等现有药房障碍,可如何进一步加强阿片类药物和大麻分发信息的综合系统。